Córdova-Sánchez Bertha M, Mejía-Vilet Juan M, Morales-Buenrostro Luis E, Loyola-Rodríguez Georgina, Uribe-Uribe Norma O, Correa-Rotter Ricardo
Department of Nephrology and Mineral Metabolism, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga #15, Sección XVI Belisario Domínguez, Delegación Tlalpan, Mexico City, Mexico.
Department of Pathologic Anatomy and Pathology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga #15, Sección XVI Belisario Domínguez, Delegación Tlalpan, Mexico City, Mexico.
Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Jul;35(7):1805-16. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3195-z. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
Several classification schemes have been developed for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV), with actual debate focusing on their clinical and prognostic performance. Sixty-two patients with renal biopsy-proven AAV from a single center in Mexico City diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 were analyzed and classified under clinical (granulomatosis with polyangiitis [GPA], microscopic polyangiitis [MPA], renal limited vasculitis [RLV]), serological (proteinase 3 anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies [PR3-ANCA], myeloperoxidase anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies [MPO-ANCA], ANCA negative), and histopathological (focal, crescenteric, mixed-type, sclerosing) categories. Clinical presentation parameters were compared at baseline between classification groups, and the predictive value of different classification categories for disease and renal remission, relapse, renal, and patient survival was analyzed. Serological classification predicted relapse rate (PR3-ANCA hazard ratio for relapse 2.93, 1.20-7.17, p = 0.019). There were no differences in disease or renal remission, renal, or patient survival between clinical and serological categories. Histopathological classification predicted response to therapy, with a poorer renal remission rate for sclerosing group and those with less than 25 % normal glomeruli; in addition, it adequately delimited 24-month glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) evolution, but it did not predict renal nor patient survival. On multivariate models, renal replacement therapy (RRT) requirement (HR 8.07, CI 1.75-37.4, p = 0.008) and proteinuria (HR 1.49, CI 1.03-2.14, p = 0.034) at presentation predicted renal survival, while age (HR 1.10, CI 1.01-1.21, p = 0.041) and infective events during the induction phase (HR 4.72, 1.01-22.1, p = 0.049) negatively influenced patient survival. At present, ANCA-based serological classification may predict AAV relapses, but neither clinical nor serological categories predict renal or patient survival. Age, renal function and proteinuria at presentation, histopathology, and infectious complications constitute the main outcome predictors and should be considered for individualized management.
针对抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCA)相关血管炎(AAV)已制定了多种分类方案,实际争论焦点在于其临床及预后表现。对2004年至2013年间在墨西哥城一个中心确诊且经肾活检证实为AAV的62例患者进行分析,并根据临床(肉芽肿性多血管炎[GPA]、显微镜下多血管炎[MPA]、肾局限性血管炎[RLV])、血清学(蛋白酶3抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体[PR3-ANCA]、髓过氧化物酶抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体[MPO-ANCA]、ANCA阴性)和组织病理学(局灶性、新月形、混合型、硬化型)类别进行分类。比较了各分类组基线时的临床表现参数,并分析了不同分类类别对疾病缓解、肾脏缓解、复发、肾脏存活及患者存活的预测价值。血清学分类可预测复发率(复发时PR3-ANCA风险比为2.93,1.20 - 7.17,p = 0.019)。临床和血清学类别在疾病缓解、肾脏缓解、肾脏存活或患者存活方面无差异。组织病理学分类可预测治疗反应,硬化型组及肾小球正常比例低于25%的患者肾脏缓解率较差;此外,它能充分界定24个月的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)变化,但不能预测肾脏或患者存活。在多变量模型中,就诊时的肾脏替代治疗(RRT)需求(HR 8.07,CI 1.75 - 37.4,p = 0.008)和蛋白尿(HR 1.49,CI 1.03 - 2.14,p = 0.034)可预测肾脏存活,而年龄(HR 1.10,CI 1.01 - 1.21,p = 0.041)和诱导期的感染事件(HR 4.72,1.01 - 22.1,p = 0.049)对患者存活有负面影响。目前,基于ANCA的血清学分类可预测AAV复发,但临床和血清学类别均不能预测肾脏或患者存活。就诊时的年龄、肾功能和蛋白尿、组织病理学及感染并发症是主要的预后预测因素,在个体化管理中应予以考虑。