• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床分期为T1期肿瘤的机器人辅助部分肾切除术:42例经验

Robotic partial nephrectomy for clinical stage T1 tumors: Experience in 42 cases.

作者信息

Ener Kemal, Canda Abdullah Erdem, Altinova Serkan, Atmaca Ali Fuat, Alkan Erdal, Asil Erem, Ozcan Muhammet Fuat, Akbulut Ziya, Balbay Mevlana Derya

机构信息

Department of Urology, Ankara Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2016 Jan;32(1):16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2015.09.008. Epub 2015 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.kjms.2015.09.008
PMID:26853170
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11916570/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) procedures. At two centers, 42 patients underwent RAPN. Radius, Exo/Endophytic, Nearness, Anterior/Posterior, Location (R.E.N.A.L.) nephrometry and PADUA scores of patients were calculated by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Intra- and perioperative (0-30 days) complications were evaluated using modified Clavien classification. A four-arm da Vinci-S robotic surgical system was used and outcomes were evaluated retrospectively. Mean age of the patients was 52.3 ± 6.5 years. Mean tumor size was 3.1 ± 1.0 (1.4-6.6) cm. R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry and PADUA scores were 6.0 ± 1.5 and 7.5 ± 0.9, respectively. Mean surgical time was 127.7 ± 18.7 minutes and estimated blood loss was 100 ± 18.1 cc. Mean warm ischemia time was 16.0 ± 8.9 (0-30) minutes. Intraoperative complications did not develop in any patient. Median hospital stay was 3.0 (2-6) days. Except for 17 patients, hilar clamping was performed in 25 patients. Histopathology results included 34 renal cell carcinoma (22 clear cell, 7 chromophobe cell, 4 papillary cell, and 1 clear papillary cell). Oncocytoma (n = 4), adenoma (n = 1), fibroadipose tissue (n = 1), papillary epithelial hyperplasia (n = 1), and chronic pyelonephritis (n = 1) were present. Surgical margins were negative in all patients. During a median follow-up period of 15.5 ± 10.9 (3-46) months, neither local recurrence nor distant metastasis was detected. In conclusion, RAPN is a safe, minimally invasive surgical approach, with excellent surgical and oncological outcomes in T1 kidney tumors. Zero ischemia off-clamp RAPN is also safe in selected masses with the advantage of avoiding complete renal ischemia.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RAPN)的手术效果。在两个中心,42例患者接受了RAPN手术。通过计算机断层扫描(CT)或磁共振成像(MRI)计算患者的半径、外生性/内生性、接近度、前后位、位置(R.E.N.A.L.)肾测量评分和帕多瓦评分。使用改良的Clavien分类法评估术中及围手术期(0 - 30天)并发症。使用四臂达芬奇 - S机器人手术系统,并对结果进行回顾性评估。患者的平均年龄为52.3±6.5岁。平均肿瘤大小为3.1±1.0(1.4 - 6.6)cm。R.E.N.A.L.肾测量评分和帕多瓦评分分别为6.0±1.5和7.5±0.9。平均手术时间为127.7±18.7分钟,估计失血量为100±18.1cc。平均热缺血时间为16.0±8.9(0 - 30)分钟。所有患者均未发生术中并发症。中位住院时间为3.0(2 - 6)天。除17例患者外,25例患者进行了肾门阻断。组织病理学结果包括34例肾细胞癌(22例透明细胞癌、7例嫌色细胞癌、4例乳头状细胞癌和1例透明乳头状细胞癌)。存在嗜酸细胞瘤(n = 4)、腺瘤(n = 1)、纤维脂肪组织(n = 1)、乳头状上皮增生(n = 1)和慢性肾盂肾炎(n = 1)。所有患者的手术切缘均为阴性。在中位随访期15.5±10.9(3 - 46)个月期间,未检测到局部复发或远处转移。总之,RAPN是一种安全的微创手术方法,对于T1期肾肿瘤具有优异的手术和肿瘤学效果。零缺血非阻断性RAPN对于选定的肿块也是安全的,具有避免完全肾缺血的优势。

相似文献

1
Robotic partial nephrectomy for clinical stage T1 tumors: Experience in 42 cases.临床分期为T1期肿瘤的机器人辅助部分肾切除术:42例经验
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2016 Jan;32(1):16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2015.09.008. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
2
PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores correlate with perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: analysis of the Vattikuti Global Quality Initiative in Robotic Urologic Surgery (GQI-RUS) database.PADUA和R.E.N.A.L.肾计量评分与机器人辅助部分肾切除术的围手术期结果相关:Vattikuti全球机器人泌尿外科手术质量倡议(GQI-RUS)数据库分析
BJU Int. 2017 Mar;119(3):456-463. doi: 10.1111/bju.13628. Epub 2016 Sep 11.
3
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for completely endophytic renal masses: a single institution experience.机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RAPN)治疗完全内生性肾肿瘤:单中心经验。
BJU Int. 2014 May;113(5):762-8. doi: 10.1111/bju.12455. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
4
Robotic versus open partial nephrectomy for highly complex renal masses: Comparison of perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes.机器人辅助与开放性部分肾切除术治疗高度复杂肾肿物:围手术期、功能及肿瘤学结局的比较
Urol Oncol. 2018 Oct;36(10):471.e1-471.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
5
Off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors.离夹机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗复杂肾肿瘤。
J Endourol. 2012 Sep;26(9):1177-82. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0353.
6
Zero ischemia robotic partial nephrectomy: Oncological and functional outcomes of a multicenter study.零缺血机器人辅助部分肾切除术:一项多中心研究的肿瘤学和功能学结果。
Turk J Med Sci. 2023 Aug;53(4):941-948. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5658. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
7
Robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: surgical technique.复杂肾肿瘤的机器人辅助部分肾切除术:手术技术
Eur Urol. 2008 Mar;53(3):514-21. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.047. Epub 2007 Oct 15.
8
Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Complex (PADUA Score ≥10) Tumors: Techniques and Results from a Multicenter Experience at Four High-volume Centers.机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗复杂(PADUA 评分≥10)肿瘤:四个高容量中心的多中心经验中的技术和结果。
Eur Urol. 2020 Jan;77(1):95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
9
Predictive Factors for Achieving Superior Pentafecta Outcomes Following Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy in Patients with Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma.局限性肾细胞癌患者机器人辅助部分肾切除术后实现卓越五联疗效的预测因素
J Endourol. 2017 Dec;31(12):1231-1236. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0369. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
10
External Validation of the Arterial-Based Complexity Score and First Head-to-Head Comparison With the R.E.N.A.L. and PADUA Scores and C-index.基于动脉的复杂性评分的外部验证及与 R.E.N.A.L. 和 PADUA 评分和 C 指数的首次头对头比较。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Jun;16(3):e595-e604. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.10.018. Epub 2017 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Natural history of treated and untreated renal oncocytoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.治疗与未治疗肾嗜酸细胞瘤的自然史:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BJU Int. 2025 Oct;136(4):590-601. doi: 10.1111/bju.16832. Epub 2025 Jul 7.
2
Comparisons of Efficiency, Safety, and Hospital Costs of Four-Arm Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) Versus Three-Arm Technique: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.四臂机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RAPN)与三臂技术的效率、安全性及医院成本比较:一项倾向评分匹配分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 16;14(8):2739. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082739.
3
Zero ischemia robotic partial nephrectomy: Oncological and functional outcomes of a multicenter study.零缺血机器人辅助部分肾切除术:一项多中心研究的肿瘤学和功能学结果。
Turk J Med Sci. 2023 Aug;53(4):941-948. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5658. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
4
U-Net Modelling-Based Imaging MAP Score for Tl Stage Nephrectomy: An Exploratory Study.基于 U-Net 模型的 Tl 期肾切除术影像学 MAP 评分:一项探索性研究。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Jan 5;2022:1084853. doi: 10.1155/2022/1084853. eCollection 2022.
5
Impact of robotic partial nephrectomy with and without ischemia on renal functions: experience in 34 cases.机器人辅助部分肾切除术有无缺血对肾功能的影响:34例经验
Turk J Urol. 2016 Dec;42(4):272-277. doi: 10.5152/tud.2016.67790.

本文引用的文献

1
Correlations of tumor size, RENAL, centrality index, preoperative aspects and dimensions used for anatomical, and diameter-axial-polar scoring with warm ischemia time in a single surgeon's series of robotic partial nephrectomy.在单外科医生机器人部分肾切除术系列中,肿瘤大小、RENAL、中心性指数、术前方面和用于解剖的尺寸以及直径-轴向-极评分与热缺血时间的相关性。
Urology. 2014 May;83(5):1075-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.01.019.
2
Current controversies and challenges in robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomies.机器人辅助、腹腔镜及开放性部分肾切除术的当前争议与挑战
World J Urol. 2014 Jun;32(3):591-6. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1277-6. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
3
Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Early single Canadian institution experience.机器人辅助腹腔镜下肾部分切除术:加拿大单一机构早期经验
Can Urol Assoc J. 2013 Sep-Oct;7(9-10):348-54. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.753.
4
Robotics in uro-oncologic surgery.泌尿外科肿瘤手术中的机器人技术。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2013 Sep 26;7:354. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2013.354.
5
A comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.机器人辅助与单纯腹腔镜下部分肾切除术的手术及功能结果比较。
JSLS. 2013 Apr-Jun;17(2):292-9. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13693422521359.
6
Open versus robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicenter comparison study of perioperative results and complications.开放性与机器人辅助下部分肾切除术:围手术期结果与并发症的多中心比较研究
World J Urol. 2014 Feb;32(1):287-93. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1136-x. Epub 2013 Aug 4.
7
Robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: utilization rates and perioperative outcomes.机器人辅助与腹腔镜部分肾切除术:使用率和围手术期结果。
Int Braz J Urol. 2013 May-Jun;39(3):377-86. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2013.03.11.
8
Robotic partial nephrectomy shortens warm ischemia time, reducing suturing time kinetics even for an experienced laparoscopic surgeon: a comparative analysis.机器人辅助部分肾切除术可缩短热缺血时间,即使对于经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生,也能减少缝合时间动态变化:一项对比分析。
World J Urol. 2014 Feb;32(1):265-71. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1115-2. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
9
A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy.机器人辅助、腹腔镜和开放性部分肾切除术的比较。
JSLS. 2012 Oct-Dec;16(4):581-7. doi: 10.4293/108680812X13462882737177.
10
Robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy: a four-arm approach.机器人辅助腹膜后肾部分切除术:一种四臂入路方法。
JSLS. 2012 Apr-Jun;16(2):208-11. doi: 10.4293/108680812x13427982376149.