Neri Antonio J, Momin Behnoosh R, Thompson Trevor D, Kahende Jennifer, Zhang Lei, Puckett Mary C, Stewart Sherri L
Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Cancer. 2016 Apr 1;122(7):1126-33. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29739. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
Comparative effectiveness studies of state tobacco quitlines and Web-based tobacco cessation interventions are limited. In 2009, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention undertook a study of the comparative effectiveness of state quitlines and Web-based tobacco cessation interventions.
Standardized questionnaires were administered to smokers who enrolled exclusively in either quitlines or Web-based tobacco cessation services in 4 states in 2011-2012. The primary outcome was the 30-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA) rate at 7 months both between and within interventions.
A total of 4086 participants were included in the analysis. Quitline users were significantly older, more heterogeneous in terms of race and ethnicity, less educated, less likely to be employed, and more often single than Web-based users. The 7-month 30-day PPA rate was 32% for quitline users and 27% for Web-based users. Multivariate models comparing 30-day PPA rates between interventions indicated that significantly increased odds of quitting were associated with being partnered, not living with another smoker, low baseline cigarette use, and more interactions with the intervention. After adjustments for demographic and tobacco use characteristics, quitline users had 1.26 the odds of being abstinent in comparison with Web-based users (95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.58; P = .053).
This is one of the largest comparative effectiveness studies of state tobacco cessation interventions to date. These findings will help public health agencies develop and tailor evidence-based tobacco cessation programs. Further research should focus on users of Web-based cessation interventions sponsored by state health departments and their cost-effectiveness.
关于各州戒烟热线与基于网络的戒烟干预措施的比较效果研究有限。2009年,美国疾病控制与预防中心开展了一项关于各州戒烟热线与基于网络的戒烟干预措施比较效果的研究。
2011 - 2012年,对仅登记参加了4个州的戒烟热线或基于网络的戒烟服务的吸烟者进行标准化问卷调查。主要结局是干预措施之间及内部7个月时的30天点患病率戒烟率(PPA)。
共有4086名参与者纳入分析。与基于网络的用户相比,戒烟热线用户年龄显著更大,种族和族裔构成更加多样化,受教育程度更低,就业可能性更小,且单身的情况更常见。戒烟热线用户7个月时的30天PPA率为32%,基于网络的用户为27%。比较干预措施之间30天PPA率的多变量模型表明,戒烟几率显著增加与处于伴侣关系、不与其他吸烟者同住、基线香烟使用量低以及与干预措施的更多互动有关。在对人口统计学和烟草使用特征进行调整后,与基于网络的用户相比,戒烟热线用户戒烟的几率为1.26(95%置信区间,1.00 - 1.58;P = 0.053)。
这是迄今为止关于各州戒烟干预措施最大规模的比较效果研究之一。这些发现将有助于公共卫生机构制定和调整基于证据的戒烟项目。进一步的研究应聚焦于由州卫生部门赞助的基于网络的戒烟干预措施的用户及其成本效益。