Section of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento.
JAMA Surg. 2020 Sep 1;155(9):816-822. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1915.
Smoking quitline programs effectively promote smoking cessation in outpatient primary care settings.
To examine the factors associated with smoking quitline engagement and smoking cessation among patients undergoing thoracic surgery who consented to a quitline electronic referral.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018, among 111 active smoking patients referred to the quitline from a thoracic surgery outpatient clinic visit. Patients were divided into operative and nonoperative cohorts.
Primary outcomes were engagement rates in the quitline program and successful smoking cessation. Secondary outcomes were self-reported point prevalence abstinence at 1 month and 6 months after the smoking quit date.
Of 111 patients (62 men; mean [SD] age, 61.8 [11.2] years) who had a quitline referral, 58 (52%) underwent surgery, and 32 of these 58 patients (55%) participated in the program. Of the 53 nonoperative patients (48%), 24 (45%) participated in the program. In the operative cohort, there was no difference in the smoking cessation rate between quitline participants and nonparticipants (21 of 32 [66%] vs 16 of 6 [62%]; P = .79) or in point prevalence abstinence at 1 month (23 of 32 [72%] vs 14 of 25 [56%]; P = .27) or 6 months (14 of 28 [50%] vs 6 of 18 [33%]; P = .36). Similarly, in the nonoperative cohort, there was no difference in the smoking cessation rate between quitline participants and nonparticipants (8 of 24 [33%] vs 11 of 29 [38%]; P = .78) or in point prevalence abstinence at 1 month (7 of 24 [29%] vs 8 of 27 [30%]; P = .99) or 6 months (6 of 23 [26%] vs 6 of 25 [24%]; P = .99). Regardless of quitline participation, operative patients had a 1.8-fold higher proportion of successful smoking cessation compared with nonoperative patients (37 of 58 [64%] vs 19 of 53 [36%]; P = .004) as well as a 2.2-fold higher proportion of 1-month point prevalence abstinence (37 of 57 [65%] vs 15 of 51 [29%]; P < .001) and a 1.8-fold higher proportion of 6-month point prevalence abstinence (20 of 45 [44%] vs 12 of 48 [25%]; P = .05). Having surgery doubled the odds of smoking cessation (odds ratio, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.06-5.64; P = .04) and quitline engagement tripled the odds of remaining smoke free at 6 months (odds ratio, 3.57; 95% CI, 1.03-12.38; P = .04).
Patients undergoing thoracic surgery were nearly twice as likely to quit smoking as those who did not have an operation, and smoking quitline participation further augmented point prevalence abstinence. Improved smoking cessation rates, even among nonoperative patients, were associated with appropriate outpatient counseling and intervention.
戒烟热线计划在门诊初级保健环境中有效地促进戒烟。
研究接受胸部手术且同意电子转介戒烟热线的患者参与戒烟热线和戒烟的相关因素。
设计、地点和参与者:回顾性队列研究于 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日在胸外科门诊就诊的 111 名活跃吸烟者中进行。患者分为手术组和非手术组。
主要结果是参与戒烟热线计划的比例和成功戒烟率。次要结果是自报告的吸烟停止日期后 1 个月和 6 个月的点患病率戒烟率。
在 111 名(62 名男性;平均[SD]年龄,61.8[11.2]岁)接受戒烟热线转介的患者中,58 名(52%)接受了手术,其中 32 名(55%)参与了该计划。53 名非手术患者(48%)中,24 名(45%)参与了该计划。在手术组中,戒烟热线参与者和非参与者的戒烟率无差异(32 名中的 21 名[66%]与 6 名中的 16 名[62%];P = .79)或 1 个月(32 名中的 23 名[72%]与 25 名中的 14 名[56%];P = .27)或 6 个月(28 名中的 14 名[50%]与 18 名中的 6 名[33%];P = .36)点患病率戒烟率也无差异。同样,在非手术组中,戒烟热线参与者和非参与者的戒烟率无差异(24 名中的 8 名[33%]与 29 名中的 11 名[38%];P = .78)或 1 个月(24 名中的 7 名[29%]与 27 名中的 8 名[30%];P = .99)或 6 个月(23 名中的 6 名[26%]与 25 名中的 6 名[24%];P = .99)。无论是否参与戒烟热线,手术患者的成功戒烟率都比非手术患者高 1.8 倍(58 名中的 37 名[64%]与 53 名中的 19 名[36%];P = .004),1 个月点患病率戒烟率高 2.2 倍(57 名中的 37 名[65%]与 51 名中的 15 名[29%];P < .001),6 个月点患病率戒烟率高 1.8 倍(45 名中的 20 名[44%]与 48 名中的 12 名[25%];P = .05)。手术使戒烟的可能性增加了两倍(比值比,2.44;95%置信区间,1.06-5.64;P = .04),而戒烟热线的参与使 6 个月时保持无烟的可能性增加了三倍(比值比,3.57;95%置信区间,1.03-12.38;P = .04)。
接受胸部手术的患者戒烟的可能性几乎是未接受手术的患者的两倍,而参与戒烟热线进一步增加了 6 个月时的点患病率戒烟率。即使在非手术患者中,也可以通过适当的门诊咨询和干预来提高戒烟率。