Dickerson M, Howerton B, Bae Y, Glazer E
Department of Chemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, United States; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40536, United States.
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40536, United States.
J Mater Chem B. 2016 Jan 21;4(3):394-408. doi: 10.1039/C5TB01613D. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
This work focuses on improving the efficacy of photoactivatable Ru complexes for photodynamic therapy by employing cross-linked nanoassemblies (CNAs) as a delivery approach. The effects of complex photoactivation, hydrophobicity, and solution ionic strength and pH on complex loading and release from CNAs were analyzed. The cell cytotoxicity of CNA formulations was similar to free Ru complexes despite reduced or eliminated DNA interactions. The release rate and the amount of each Ru complex released (%) varied inversely with complex hydrophobicity, while the effect of solution ionic strength was dependent on complex hydrophobicity. Premature release of two photoactivatable prodrugs prior to irradiation was believed to account for higher activity in cells studies compared to DNA interaction studies; however, for photostable O generator-loaded CNAs this cannot explain the high cytotoxicity and lack of DNA interactions because release was incomplete after 48 hrs. The cause remains unclear, but among other possibilities, accelerated release in a cell culture environment may be responsible.
这项工作聚焦于通过采用交联纳米组装体(CNA)作为递送方法来提高用于光动力疗法的光活化钌配合物的疗效。分析了配合物光活化、疏水性、溶液离子强度和pH对配合物从CNA的负载和释放的影响。尽管DNA相互作用减少或消除,但CNA制剂的细胞毒性与游离钌配合物相似。每种钌配合物的释放速率和释放量(%)与配合物疏水性呈反比,而溶液离子强度的影响取决于配合物疏水性。与DNA相互作用研究相比,两种光活化前药在照射前的过早释放被认为是细胞研究中活性较高的原因;然而,对于负载光稳定氧生成剂的CNA,这无法解释其高细胞毒性和缺乏DNA相互作用,因为48小时后释放并不完全。原因尚不清楚,但在其他可能性中,细胞培养环境中的加速释放可能是原因所在。