Suppr超能文献

癌症患者治疗决策和生存问题辅助沟通渠道的开发与利用:CIS研究联盟的经验

Development and utilization of complementary communication channels for treatment decision making and survivorship issues among cancer patients: The CIS Research Consortium Experience.

作者信息

Fleisher Linda, Wen Kuang Yi, Miller Suzanne M, Diefenbach Michael, Stanton Annette L, Ropka Mary, Morra Marion, Raich Peter C

机构信息

Associate Research Professor - Adjunct, Cancer Prevention and Control, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA. Senior Scientist, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, USA, 3535 Market Street - Room 1177, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.

Assistant Professor, Cancer Prevention and Control, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA.

出版信息

Internet Interv. 2015 Nov 1;2(4):392-398. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2015.09.002.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Cancer patients and survivors are assuming active roles in decision-making and digital patient support tools are widely used to facilitate patient engagement. As part of Cancer Information Service Research Consortium's randomized controlled trials focused on the efficacy of eHealth interventions to promote informed treatment decision-making for newly diagnosed prostate and breast cancer patients, and post-treatment breast cancer, we conducted a rigorous process evaluation to examine the actual use of and perceived benefits of two complementary communication channels -- print and eHealth interventions.

METHODS

The three Virtual Cancer Information Service (V-CIS) interventions were developed through a rigorous developmental process, guided by self-regulatory theory, informed decision-making frameworks, and health communications best practices. Control arm participants received NCI print materials; experimental arm participants received the additional V-CIS patient support tool. Actual usage data from the web-based V-CIS was also obtained and reported.

RESULTS

Print materials were highly used by all groups. About 60% of the experimental group reported using the V-CIS. Those who did use the V-CIS rated it highly on improvements in knowledge, patient-provider communication and decision-making.

CONCLUSION

The findings show that how patients actually use eHealth interventions either singularly or within the context of other communication channels is complex.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Integrating rigorous best practices and theoretical foundations is essential and multiple communication approaches should be considered to support patient preferences.

摘要

目的

癌症患者及其幸存者在决策过程中发挥着积极作用,数字患者支持工具被广泛用于促进患者参与。作为癌症信息服务研究联盟随机对照试验的一部分,该试验聚焦于电子健康干预措施对新诊断的前列腺癌和乳腺癌患者以及乳腺癌治疗后患者促进明智治疗决策的疗效,我们进行了一项严格的过程评估,以考察两种互补沟通渠道——印刷品和电子健康干预措施的实际使用情况及感知益处。

方法

三项虚拟癌症信息服务(V-CIS)干预措施是通过严格的开发过程制定的,以自我调节理论、明智决策框架和健康沟通最佳实践为指导。对照组参与者收到美国国立癌症研究所的印刷材料;实验组参与者收到额外的V-CIS患者支持工具。还获取并报告了基于网络的V-CIS的实际使用数据。

结果

所有组对印刷材料的使用率都很高。约60%的实验组报告使用了V-CIS。那些确实使用了V-CIS的人对其在知识、医患沟通和决策方面的改善给予了高度评价。

结论

研究结果表明,患者单独或在其他沟通渠道背景下实际使用电子健康干预措施的方式很复杂。

实践意义

整合严格的最佳实践和理论基础至关重要,应考虑多种沟通方式以支持患者的偏好。

相似文献

2
3
4
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
8
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
10

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Responding to a significant recruitment challenge within three nationwide psychoeducational trials for cancer patients.
J Cancer Surviv. 2013 Sep;7(3):392-403. doi: 10.1007/s11764-013-0282-x. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
4
Comparative analysis of print and multimedia health materials: a review of the literature.
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Oct;89(1):7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.007. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
5
The development and preliminary testing of a multimedia patient-provider survivorship communication module for breast cancer survivors.
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Aug;88(2):344-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.02.003. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
6
Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice.
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1361-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6. Epub 2012 May 23.
7
What happens now? Psychosocial care for cancer survivors after medical treatment completion.
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Apr 10;30(11):1215-20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.7406. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
8
Build it, and will they come? Unexpected findings from a study on a Web-based intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening.
J Health Commun. 2012;17(1):41-53. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.571338. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
9
Progress against cancer (1971-2011): how far have we come?
J Intern Med. 2012 Apr;271(4):392-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02462.x. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
10
How does feeling informed relate to being informed? The DECISIONS survey.
Med Decis Making. 2010 Sep-Oct;30(5 Suppl):77S-84S. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10379647.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验