Frost H R, Tsoi S K, Baker C A, Laho D, Sanderson-Smith M L, Steer A C, Smeesters P R
Group A Streptococcus Research Group, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Flemington Road, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Laboratoire de Bactériologie Moléculaire, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Feb 8;9:72. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-1875-z.
The practice of counting bacterial colony forming units on agar plates has long been used as a method to estimate the concentration of live bacteria in culture. However, due to the laborious and potentially error prone nature of this measurement technique, an alternative method is desirable. Recent technologic advancements have facilitated the development of automated colony counting systems, which reduce errors introduced during the manual counting process and recording of information. An additional benefit is the significant reduction in time taken to analyse colony counting data. Whilst automated counting procedures have been validated for a number of microorganisms, the process has not been successful for all bacteria due to the requirement for a relatively high contrast between bacterial colonies and growth medium. The purpose of this study was to validate an automated counting system for use with group A Streptococcus (GAS).
Twenty-one different GAS strains, representative of major emm-types, were selected for assessment. In order to introduce the required contrast for automated counting, 2,3,5-triphenyl-2H-tetrazolium chloride (TTC) dye was added to Todd-Hewitt broth with yeast extract (THY) agar. Growth on THY agar with TTC was compared with growth on blood agar and THY agar to ensure the dye was not detrimental to bacterial growth. Automated colony counts using a ProtoCOL 3 instrument were compared with manual counting to confirm accuracy over the stages of the growth cycle (latent, mid-log and stationary phases) and in a number of different assays. The average percentage differences between plating and counting methods were analysed using the Bland-Altman method.
A percentage difference of ±10 % was determined as the cut-off for a critical difference between plating and counting methods. All strains measured had an average difference of less than 10 % when plated on THY agar with TTC. This consistency was also observed over all phases of the growth cycle and when plated in blood following bactericidal assays. Agreement between these methods suggest the use of an automated colony counting technique for GAS will significantly reduce time spent counting bacteria to enable a more efficient and accurate measurement of bacteria concentration in culture.
在琼脂平板上计数细菌菌落形成单位的做法长期以来一直被用作估计培养物中活细菌浓度的一种方法。然而,由于这种测量技术费力且可能容易出错,因此需要一种替代方法。最近的技术进步推动了自动菌落计数系统的发展,该系统减少了手动计数过程和信息记录过程中引入的误差。另一个好处是分析菌落计数数据所需的时间显著减少。虽然自动计数程序已针对多种微生物进行了验证,但由于细菌菌落与生长培养基之间需要相对较高的对比度,该过程并非对所有细菌都成功。本研究的目的是验证一种用于A组链球菌(GAS)的自动计数系统。
选择了代表主要emm型的21种不同的GAS菌株进行评估。为了引入自动计数所需的对比度,将2,3,5-三苯基-2H-四氮唑氯化物(TTC)染料添加到含有酵母提取物的托德-休伊特肉汤(THY)琼脂中。将添加TTC的THY琼脂上的生长情况与血琼脂和THY琼脂上的生长情况进行比较,以确保染料对细菌生长无害。使用ProtoCOL 3仪器进行的自动菌落计数与手动计数进行比较,以确认在生长周期的各个阶段(潜伏期、对数中期和稳定期)以及在一些不同的试验中的准确性。使用布兰德-奥特曼方法分析平板接种和计数方法之间的平均百分比差异。
将±10%的百分比差异确定为平板接种和计数方法之间临界差异的截止值。当接种在添加TTC的THY琼脂上时,所有测量的菌株平均差异均小于10%。在生长周期的所有阶段以及在杀菌试验后接种于血液中时,也观察到了这种一致性。这些方法之间的一致性表明,使用针对GAS的自动菌落计数技术将显著减少计数细菌所花费的时间,从而能够更高效、准确地测量培养物中细菌的浓度。