Günczler P, Ogris E, Maca S, Danmayr E
Ludwig Boltzmann Institut für klinische Onkologie im Krankenhaus der Stadt Wien - Lainz.
Onkologie. 1989 Oct;12(5):209-14. doi: 10.1159/000216647.
We have analyzed 1301 serum determinations of the tumor markers CA 15-3 and CEA in 405 breast cancer patients. CA 15-3 exhibited a higher accuracy than CEA (sensitivity-specificity diagram). Using cut-off levels of 30 U/ml (CA 15-3) and 5 ng/ml (CEA) we observed a sensitivity of 70.7% versus 61.8% and an approximate specificity of 93.8% versus 83.4%. The sensitivity of the panel of both markers was 80.9%, the specificity 84.5%. The high specificity of both markers caused high positive predictive values. The marker expression was higher in patients with hematogenic metastasis than with local recurrences (the median for CA 15-3 levels was 88.2 U/ml versus 26.6 U/ml; for CEA: 10.0 ng/ml versus 2.5 ng/ml). Less expression of both markers in patients younger than 40 years in comparison to patients older than 40 seems to be remarkable. Early detection of relapse - a marker increase over the cut-off level before clinical proof - was observed in 43.8% (CA 15-3; median of leadtime 6.1 months) of 73 patients; CEA: 24.7%, 7.2 months. Metastasis was predicted 3-6 times more often than local recurrences. Monitoring of the manifest more or less progressed tumor is still the main task of present tumor markers. But the results also suggesting the use of these markers for early detection of metastasis, especially in panels.
我们分析了405例乳腺癌患者的1301份血清肿瘤标志物CA 15-3和癌胚抗原(CEA)检测结果。CA 15-3的准确性高于CEA(敏感性-特异性图)。采用30 U/ml(CA 15-3)和5 ng/ml(CEA)的临界值,我们观察到CA 15-3的敏感性为70.7%,CEA为61.8%;CA 15-3的近似特异性为93.8%,CEA为83.4%。两种标志物联合检测的敏感性为80.9%,特异性为84.5%。两种标志物的高特异性导致了高阳性预测值。血行转移患者的标志物表达高于局部复发患者(CA 15-3水平中位数为88.2 U/ml对26.6 U/ml;CEA:10.0 ng/ml对2.5 ng/ml)。与40岁以上患者相比,40岁以下患者两种标志物的表达较低,这似乎值得注意。在73例患者中,43.8%(CA 15-3;提前期中位数6.1个月)观察到复发的早期检测——标志物水平在临床确诊前超过临界值升高;CEA:24.7%,7.2个月。转移的预测次数比局部复发多3至6倍。监测已出现的、或多或少进展的肿瘤仍然是目前肿瘤标志物的主要任务。但结果也表明这些标志物可用于转移的早期检测,尤其是联合检测。