Bell Alison M, Dochtermann Ned A
School of Integrative Biology, Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, Neuroscience Program and Program in Ecology, Evolution and Conservation.
Department of Biological Sciences, Dept. 2715, North Dakota State University, PO Box 6050, Fargo, ND 58108-6050.
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2015 Dec 1;6:111-114. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.10.014.
It is now well appreciated that individual animals behave differently from one another and that individual differences in behaviors-personality differences-are maintained through time and across situations. Quantitative genetics has emerged as a conceptual basis for understanding the key ingredients of personality: (co)variation and plasticity. However, the results from quantitative genetic analyses are often divorced from underlying molecular or other proximate mechanisms. This disconnect has the potential to impede an integrated understanding of behavior and is a disconnect present throughout evolutionary ecology. Here we discuss some of the main conceptual connections between personality and quantitative genetics, the relationship of both with genomic tools, and areas that require integration. With its consideration of both trait variation and plasticity, the study of animal personality offers new opportunities to incorporate molecular mechanisms into both the trait partitioning and reaction norm frameworks provided by quantitative genetics.
现在人们已经充分认识到,个体动物之间的行为方式各不相同,而且行为上的个体差异——个性差异——会随着时间的推移以及在不同情境中持续存在。数量遗传学已成为理解个性关键要素(协方差和可塑性)的概念基础。然而,数量遗传分析的结果往往与潜在的分子机制或其他近因机制脱节。这种脱节有可能阻碍对行为的综合理解,并且是贯穿进化生态学的一种脱节现象。在这里,我们讨论个性与数量遗传学之间的一些主要概念联系、两者与基因组工具的关系以及需要整合的领域。动物个性研究既考虑了性状变异又考虑了可塑性,为将分子机制纳入数量遗传学提供的性状划分和反应规范框架创造了新机会。