Minias P, Bateson Z W, Whittingham L A, Johnson J A, Oyler-McCance S, Dunn P O
Department of Teacher Training and Biodiversity Studies, University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
Behavioral and Molecular Ecology Group, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Heredity (Edinb). 2016 May;116(5):466-76. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2016.6. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
Genes of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) encode receptor molecules that are responsible for recognition of intracellular and extracellular pathogens (class I and class II genes, respectively) in vertebrates. Given the different roles of class I and II MHC genes, one might expect the strength of selection to differ between these two classes. Different selective pressures may also promote different rates of gene conversion at each class. Despite these predictions, surprisingly few studies have looked at differences between class I and II genes in terms of both selection and gene conversion. Here, we investigated the molecular evolution of MHC class I and II genes in five closely related species of prairie grouse (Centrocercus and Tympanuchus) that possess one class I and two class II loci. We found striking differences in the strength of balancing selection acting on MHC class I versus class II genes. More than half of the putative antigen-binding sites (ABS) of class II were under positive or episodic diversifying selection, compared with only 10% at class I. We also found that gene conversion had a stronger role in shaping the evolution of MHC class II than class I. Overall, the combination of strong positive (balancing) selection and frequent gene conversion has maintained higher diversity of MHC class II than class I in prairie grouse. This is one of the first studies clearly demonstrating that macroevolutionary mechanisms can act differently on genes involved in the immune response against intracellular and extracellular pathogens.
主要组织相容性复合体(MHC)的基因编码受体分子,这些受体分子负责识别脊椎动物体内的细胞内和细胞外病原体(分别为I类和II类基因)。鉴于I类和II类MHC基因的不同作用,人们可能会预期这两类基因的选择强度有所不同。不同的选择压力也可能导致每一类基因的基因转换速率不同。尽管有这些预测,但令人惊讶的是,很少有研究从选择和基因转换两方面来研究I类和II类基因之间的差异。在这里,我们研究了五种亲缘关系密切的草原松鸡(Centrocercus和Tympanuchus)中MHC I类和II类基因的分子进化,这些草原松鸡拥有一个I类和两个II类基因座。我们发现,作用于MHC I类和II类基因的平衡选择强度存在显著差异。II类基因中超过一半的假定抗原结合位点(ABS)受到正选择或间歇性多样化选择,而I类基因中只有10%。我们还发现,基因转换在塑造MHC II类基因的进化过程中比I类基因发挥了更强的作用。总体而言,在草原松鸡中,强烈的正(平衡)选择和频繁的基因转换相结合,使得MHC II类基因的多样性高于I类基因。这是首批明确证明宏观进化机制对参与针对细胞内和细胞外病原体免疫反应的基因作用不同的研究之一。