Bateson Zachary W, Whittingham Linda A, Johnson Jeff A, Dunn Peter O
Behavioral and Molecular Ecology Group, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Department of Biological Sciences, Institute of Applied Sciences, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA.
Mol Ecol. 2015 Dec;24(24):6095-106. doi: 10.1111/mec.13459. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
Immune-receptor genes of the adaptive immune system, such as the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), are involved in recognizing specific pathogens and are known to have high rates of adaptive evolution, presumably as a consequence of rapid co-evolution between hosts and pathogens. In contrast, many 'mediating' genes of the immune system do not interact directly with specific pathogens and are involved in signalling (e.g. cytokines) or controlling immune cell growth. As a consequence, we might expect stronger selection at immune-receptor than mediating genes, but these two types of genes have not been compared directly in wild populations. Here, we tested the hypothesis that selection differs between MHC (class I and II) and mediating genes by comparing levels of population differentiation across the range of greater prairie-chickens (Tympanuchus cupido). As predicted, there was stronger population differentiation and isolation by distance at immune receptor (MHC) than at either mediating genes or neutral microsatellites, suggesting a stronger role of local adaptation at the MHC. In contrast, mediating genes displayed weaker differentiation between populations than neutral microsatellites, consistent with selection favouring similar alleles across populations for mediating genes. In addition to selection, drift also had a stronger effect on immune receptor (MHC) than mediating genes as indicated by the stronger decline of MHC variation in relation to population size. This is the first study in the wild to show that the effects of selection and drift on immune genes vary across populations depending on their functional role.
适应性免疫系统的免疫受体基因,如主要组织相容性复合体(MHC),参与识别特定病原体,并且已知具有高适应性进化速率,推测这是宿主与病原体之间快速协同进化的结果。相比之下,免疫系统的许多“介导”基因并不直接与特定病原体相互作用,而是参与信号传导(如细胞因子)或控制免疫细胞生长。因此,我们可能预期免疫受体基因比介导基因受到更强的选择,但这两种类型的基因尚未在野生种群中直接比较。在这里,我们通过比较大草原榛鸡(草原榛鸡)分布范围内的种群分化水平,检验了MHC(I类和II类)与介导基因之间选择存在差异的假设。正如预测的那样,免疫受体(MHC)的种群分化和距离隔离比介导基因或中性微卫星更强,这表明MHC在局部适应中发挥了更强的作用。相比之下,介导基因在种群间的分化比中性微卫星弱,这与介导基因在不同种群中选择相似等位基因一致。除了选择之外,如MHC变异相对于种群大小的更强下降所示,遗传漂变对免疫受体(MHC)的影响也比介导基因更强。这是在野外进行的第一项研究,表明选择和遗传漂变对免疫基因的影响因种群的功能作用而异。