Pesl Peter, Herrero Pau, Reddy Monika, Oliver Nick, Johnston Desmond G, Toumazou Christofer, Georgiou Pantelis
1 Centre for Bio-Inspired Technology, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
2 Division of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jan;11(1):37-42. doi: 10.1177/1932296816629986. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
Insulin bolus calculators assist people with Type 1 diabetes (T1D) to calculate the amount of insulin required for meals to achieve optimal glucose levels but lack adaptability and personalization. We have proposed enhancing bolus calculators by the means of case-based reasoning (CBR), an established problem-solving methodology, by individualizing and optimizing insulin therapy for various meal situations. CBR learns from experiences of past similar meals, which are described in cases through a set of parameters (eg, time of meal, alcohol, exercise). This work discusses the selection, representation and effect of case parameters used for a CBR-based Advanced Bolus Calculator for Diabetes (ABC4D).
We analyzed the usage and effect of selected parameters during a pilot study (n = 10), where participants used ABC4D for 6 weeks. Retrospectively, we evaluated the effect of glucose rate of change before the meal on the glycemic excursion. Feedback from study participants about the choice of parameters was obtained through a nonvalidated questionnaire.
Exercise and alcohol were the most frequently used parameters, which was congruent with the feedback from study participants, who found these parameters most useful. Furthermore, cases including either exercise or alcohol as parameter showed a trend in reduction of insulin at the end of the study. A significant difference ( P < .01) was found in glycemic outcomes for meals where glucose rate of change was rising compared to stable rate of change.
Results from the 6-week study indicate the potential benefit of including parameters exercise, alcohol and glucose-rate of change for insulin dosing decision support.
胰岛素大剂量计算器可帮助1型糖尿病(T1D)患者计算进餐所需胰岛素量,以实现最佳血糖水平,但缺乏适应性和个性化。我们建议通过基于案例的推理(CBR)这一既定的问题解决方法来改进大剂量计算器,针对各种进餐情况对胰岛素治疗进行个性化和优化。CBR从过去类似进餐的经验中学习,这些经验在案例中通过一组参数(如进餐时间、酒精、运动)进行描述。本文讨论了用于基于CBR的糖尿病高级大剂量计算器(ABC4D)的案例参数的选择、表示和效果。
我们在一项试点研究(n = 10)中分析了所选参数的使用情况和效果,参与者使用ABC4D达6周。回顾性地,我们评估了餐前血糖变化率对血糖波动的影响。通过一份未经验证的问卷获得了研究参与者关于参数选择的反馈。
运动和酒精是最常用的参数,这与研究参与者的反馈一致,他们认为这些参数最有用。此外,将运动或酒精作为参数的案例在研究结束时显示出胰岛素减少的趋势。与稳定变化率相比,血糖变化率上升的餐次的血糖结果存在显著差异(P <.01)。
为期6周的研究结果表明,纳入运动、酒精和血糖变化率参数对胰岛素剂量决策支持具有潜在益处。