Merheb Joe, Temmerman Andy, Rasmusson Lars, Kübler Alexander, Thor Andreas, Quirynen Marc
Unit of Periodontology, Department of Oral Health Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Apr;18(2):253-60. doi: 10.1111/cid.12290. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
Osteoporosis is a major skeletal disease affecting millions of people worldwide. Recent studies claim that patients with osteoporosis do not have a higher risk of early implant failure compared to non-osteoporotic patients. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of skeletal osteoporosis and local bone density on initial dental implant stability.
Seventy-three patients were recruited and were assigned (based on a Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry scan) to either the osteoporosis (Opr), osteopenia (Opn), or control (C) group. Forty nine of the 73 patients received dental implants and had implant stability measured by means of resonance frequency analysis (RFA) at implant placement and at prosthetic abutment placement. On the computerized tomography scans, the cortical thickness and the bone density (Hounsfield Units) at the sites of implant placement were measured.
At implant placement, primary stability was on average lower in group Opr (63.3 ± 10.3 ISQ) than in group Opn (65.3 ± 7.5 implant stability qutient (ISQ)), and group C (66.7 ± 8.7 ISQ). At abutment placement, a similar trend was observed: group Opr (66.4 ± 9.5 ISQ) scored lower than group Opn (70.7 ± 7.8 ISQ), while the highest average was for group C (72.2 ± 7.2 ISQ). The difference between groups Opr and C was significant. Implant length and diameter did not have a significant effect on implant stability as measured with RFA. A significant correlation was found between local bone density and implant stability for all regions of interest.
Implant stability seems to be influenced by both local and skeletal bone densities. The lower stability scores in patient with skeletal osteoporosis reinforce the recommendations that safe protocols and longer healing times could be recommended when treating those patients with dental implants.
骨质疏松症是一种主要的骨骼疾病,影响着全球数百万人。最近的研究表明,与非骨质疏松症患者相比,骨质疏松症患者早期种植体失败的风险并不更高。本研究的目的是评估骨骼骨质疏松和局部骨密度对初始牙种植体稳定性的影响。
招募了73名患者,并(基于双能X线吸收法扫描)将其分为骨质疏松组(Opr)、骨量减少组(Opn)或对照组(C)。73名患者中的49名接受了牙种植体,并在种植体植入时和修复基台植入时通过共振频率分析(RFA)测量种植体稳定性。在计算机断层扫描上,测量种植体植入部位的皮质厚度和骨密度(亨氏单位)。
在种植体植入时,Opr组的初始稳定性平均(63.3±10.3 ISQ)低于Opn组(65.3±7.5种植体稳定性商数(ISQ))和C组(66.7±8.7 ISQ)。在基台植入时,观察到类似趋势:Opr组(66.4±9.5 ISQ)得分低于Opn组(70.7±7.8 ISQ),而C组平均得分最高(72.2±7.2 ISQ)。Opr组和C组之间的差异具有显著性。种植体长度和直径对通过RFA测量的种植体稳定性没有显著影响。在所有感兴趣区域,局部骨密度与种植体稳定性之间存在显著相关性。
种植体稳定性似乎受局部和骨骼骨密度的影响。骨骼骨质疏松患者较低的稳定性评分强化了以下建议,即在为这些患者进行牙种植治疗时,可推荐安全方案和更长的愈合时间。