Herpin D
Service de Cardiologie B, CHU La Milétrie, Poltiers.
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1989 Sep 30;38(7 Pt 2):451-4.
Ambulatory measurement of the blood pressure may be considered as a reliable technique. Its validity is demonstrated by two types of factors: the first is physiological: the nycthemeral curves obtained with this method are similar to those provided by the first invasive studies, and especially show a definite nocturnal depression in most individuals; the second is epidemiological: the ambulatory blood pressure level is closely correlated with the left ventricular mass, measured on sonograms and has a good predictive value of future cardiovascular accidents. Its superiority over the standard measurement method, lies in the very principle of the method. It is an automatic measurement: the "white coat" artefact is therefore avoided. It is a repetitive and prolonged measurement, permitting therefore to analyze a complete nyctohemeral cycle instead of a single sample. Finally, it is an ambulatory measurement: the patients is therefore in his usual environment and not in the peculiar context of a medical office. However, the limitations of the method must be presented. The most important result from the interpretation of the collected data: the so-called aberrant values are identified from very arbitrary criteria and their elimination may be at the origin of errors; the currently available "norms" are only a indication and do not enable the physician to decide decisively between abstention and therapeutic intervention. An ambulatory blood pressure recording is particularly justified in the following two circumstances: 1) definite dissociation between elevated blood pressure at the consultation and moderate visceral repercussions; 2) hypertension resisting to an apparently well managed treatment that one hesitates to increase.
动态血压测量可被视为一种可靠的技术。其有效性由两类因素证明:第一类是生理因素:用这种方法获得的昼夜曲线与首次侵入性研究提供的曲线相似,并且在大多数个体中尤其显示出明确的夜间血压下降;第二类是流行病学因素:动态血压水平与超声心动图测量的左心室质量密切相关,并且对未来心血管意外有良好的预测价值。它相对于标准测量方法的优越性,在于该方法的原理本身。它是自动测量:因此避免了“白大褂”效应。它是重复且长时间的测量,因此能够分析完整的昼夜周期而非单个样本。最后,它是动态测量:因此患者处于其日常环境中,而非在医疗办公室的特殊环境中。然而,必须指出该方法的局限性。对所收集数据进行解读得出的最重要结果是:所谓的异常值是根据非常随意的标准确定的,消除这些值可能会导致误差;目前可用的“标准”只是一种参考,无法使医生在不采取措施和进行治疗干预之间做出决定性的判断。在以下两种情况下,动态血压记录尤其合理:1)就诊时血压升高与中度内脏反应之间存在明显分离;2)高血压对看似管理良好的治疗有抵抗,而医生又犹豫是否要增加治疗强度。