Zuercher Patrick, Groen Justus L, Aries Marcel J H, Steyerberg Ewout W, Maas Andrew I R, Ercole Ari, Menon David K
1 Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge , Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom .
2 Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Inselspital , Bern, Switzerland .
J Neurotrauma. 2016 Oct 1;33(19):1768-1774. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4266. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
We aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the Therapy Intensity Level scale (TIL) for intracranial pressure (ICP) management. We reviewed the medical records of 31 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in two European intensive care units (ICUs). The ICP TIL was derived over a 4-day period for 4-h (TIL4) and 24-h epochs (TIL24). TIL scores were compared with historical schemes for TIL measurement, with each other, and with clinical variables. TIL24 scores in ICU patients with TBI were compared with two control groups: patients with extracranial trauma necessitating intensive care (Trauma_ICU; n = 20) and patients with TBI not needing ICU care (TBI_WARD; n = 19), to further determine the discriminative validity of the TIL for ICP-related ICU interventions. Interrater and intraobserver agreement were excellent for TIL4 and TIL24 (Cohen κ: 0.98-0.99; intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.99-1; p < 0.0005). The mean + standard deviation (SD) TIL24 in the ICU TBI cohort was significantly higher than the Trauma_ICU patients and the TBI_WARD patients (8.2 ± 3.2 vs. 2.2 ± 0.9 and 0.1 ± 0.1, respectively; p < 0.005 for both comparisons). Correlations between the TIL scale scores and historical TIL scores, between TIL24 and the Glasgow Coma Scale, and between a range of TIL metrics and summary measures of ICP over the 4-day period, were all highly significant (p < 0.01). The results were consistent with the expected direction. A linear mixed effect analysis, accounting for within-subjects repeated measures, showed strong correlation between TIL4 and 4-h ICP (p < 0.0000005). The TIL scale is a reliable measurement instrument with a high degree of validity for assessing the therapeutic intensity level of ICP management in patients with TBI.
我们旨在评估用于颅内压(ICP)管理的治疗强度水平量表(TIL)的可靠性和有效性。我们回顾了欧洲两个重症监护病房(ICU)中31例创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的病历。ICP的TIL是在4天时间内,针对4小时时段(TIL4)和24小时时段(TIL24)得出的。将TIL评分与TIL测量的历史方案、相互之间以及与临床变量进行比较。将ICU中TBI患者的TIL24评分与两个对照组进行比较:需要重症监护的颅外创伤患者(创伤ICU;n = 20)和不需要ICU护理的TBI患者(TBI病房;n = 19),以进一步确定TIL对与ICP相关的ICU干预措施的判别效度。TIL4和TIL24的评分者间和观察者内一致性极佳(Cohen κ:0.98 - 0.99;组内相关系数:0.99 - 1;p < 0.0005)。ICU中TBI队列的平均 + 标准差(SD)TIL24显著高于创伤ICU患者和TBI病房患者(分别为8.2 ± 3.2 vs. 2.2 ± 0.9和0.1 ± 0.1;两项比较p均 < 0.005)。TIL量表评分与历史TIL评分之间、TIL24与格拉斯哥昏迷量表之间以及4天期间一系列TIL指标与ICP汇总测量值之间的相关性均高度显著(p < 0.01)。结果与预期方向一致。考虑受试者内重复测量的线性混合效应分析显示,TIL4与4小时ICP之间存在强相关性(p < 0.0000005)。TIL量表是一种可靠的测量工具,对于评估TBI患者ICP管理的治疗强度水平具有高度有效性。