Csepregi Kristóf, Neugart Susanne, Schreiner Monika, Hideg Éva
Department of Plant Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Pécs, Ifjúság u. 6, H-7624 Pécs, Hungary.
Department Quality, Leibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Theodor-Echtermeyer-Weg 1, 14979 Großbeeren, Germany.
Molecules. 2016 Feb 9;21(2):208. doi: 10.3390/molecules21020208.
Thirty-seven samples of naturally occurring phenolic compounds were evaluated using three common in vitro assays for total antioxidant activity (TAC) testing: the Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (TEAC), the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP) and the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging assay, in addition to the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent reactivity (FCR). We found that antioxidant hierarchies depended on the choice of assay and applied ANOVA analyses to explore underlying structure-TAC dependencies. In addition to statistically confirming the empirically established connection between flavonoid ring-B catechol and high TEAC or FRAP, new correlations were also found. In flavonoids, (i) hydroxyl groups on ring-B had a positive effect on all four TAC assays; (ii) the presence of a 3-hydroxyl group on ring-C increased TEAC and FRAP, but had no effect on DPPH or FCR; (iii) Phenolic acids lacking a 3-hydroxyl group had significantly lower FRAP or DPPH than compounds having this structure, while TEAC or FCR were not affected. Results demonstrated that any TAC-based ranking of phenolic rich samples would very much depend on the choice of assay, and argue for use of more than one technique. As an illustration, we compared results of the above four assays using either grapevine leaf extracts or synthetic mixtures of compounds prepared according to major polyphenols identified in the leaves.
使用三种常见的体外总抗氧化活性(TAC)测试方法,即特洛克斯等效抗氧化能力(TEAC)、铁还原抗氧化能力(FRAP)和2,2-二苯基-1-苦基肼(DPPH)自由基清除试验,对37种天然存在的酚类化合物样本进行了评估,此外还测试了福林-西奥尔特试剂反应性(FCR)。我们发现抗氧化等级取决于测试方法的选择,并应用方差分析来探索潜在的结构与TAC的相关性。除了从统计学上证实黄酮类化合物B环儿茶酚与高TEAC或FRAP之间已通过实验确定的联系外,还发现了新的相关性。在黄酮类化合物中,(i)B环上的羟基对所有四种TAC测试均有积极影响;(ii)C环上3-羟基的存在增加了TEAC和FRAP,但对DPPH或FCR没有影响;(iii)缺乏3-羟基的酚酸的FRAP或DPPH显著低于具有该结构的化合物,而TEAC或FCR不受影响。结果表明,任何基于TAC对富含酚类样本的排名在很大程度上取决于测试方法的选择,并支持使用多种技术。作为例证,我们使用葡萄叶提取物或根据叶片中鉴定出的主要多酚制备的化合物合成混合物,比较了上述四种测试的结果。