Suppr超能文献

在阻生第三磨牙拔除后,选择口内或口外、红色或红外激光照射。

Choosing between intraoral or extraoral, red or infrared laser irradiation after impacted third molar extraction.

作者信息

Sierra Simone Oliveira, Deana Alessandro Melo, Bussadori Sandra Kalil, da Mota Ana Carolina Costa, Ferrari Raquel Agnelli Mesquita, do Vale Katia Llanos, Fernandes Kristianne Porta Santos

机构信息

Rehabilitation Sciences Post Graduation Program, Universidade Nove de Julho/UNINOVE, Rua Vergueiro, 249, São Paulo, São Paulo, 01504-001, Brazil.

Biophotonics Applied to Health Sciences Post Graduation Program, Universidade Nove de Julho/UNINOVE, Rua Vergueiro, 249, São Paulo, São Paulo, 01504-001, Brazil.

出版信息

Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Jul;48(5):511-8. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22488. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Swelling and trismus are complications experienced by nearly all subjects after undergoing oral surgery for the removal of impacted teeth. The main purpose of this paper was to compare the effects of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) at two different wavelengths applied intra-orally and extra-orally on facial swelling and trismus in the postoperative period following the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty subjects were randomly divided into five groups, taking into account the type of laser therapy applied after surgery (intraoral or extraoral irradiation with 660 nm laser; intraoral or extraoral irradiation with 808 nm; and sham irradiation). Two and seven days after the surgery, two blinded evaluators measured the subjects' faces (swelling), and mouth opening (trismus).

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant interaction between the irradiation site and wavelength (swelling and trismus were smaller if the red laser was applied intra-orally or if infrared laser was applied extra-orally). The intra-group analyses showed that 808 nm laser applied extra-orally favored reductions in postoperative facial swelling and trismus, although the inter-group comparisons revealed no statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSION

Besides energy parameters, the combination of irradiation site and wavelength drive the results of phototherapy after the removal of impacted teeth. Lasers Surg. Med. 48:511-518, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

摘要

背景与目的

几乎所有接受拔除阻生齿口腔手术的患者都会出现肿胀和牙关紧闭的并发症。本文的主要目的是比较在拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙术后,两种不同波长的光生物调节疗法(PBMT)经口内和口外应用对面部肿胀和牙关紧闭的影响。

研究设计/材料与方法:考虑到术后应用的激光治疗类型(660nm激光口内或口外照射;808nm激光口内或口外照射;以及假照射),将60名受试者随机分为五组。术后第2天和第7天,两名盲法评估者测量受试者的面部(肿胀情况)和开口度(牙关紧闭情况)。

结果

照射部位和波长之间存在统计学上的显著交互作用(如果口内应用红色激光或口外应用红外激光,肿胀和牙关紧闭情况会减轻)。组内分析表明,口外应用808nm激光有利于减轻术后面部肿胀和牙关紧闭,尽管组间比较未显示出统计学上的显著差异。

结论

除了能量参数外,照射部位和波长的组合会影响阻生齿拔除后光疗的效果。《激光外科与医学》48:511 - 518, 2016。© 2016威利期刊公司。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验