• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

康复里程碑量表老年版的心理测量学特性。

Psychometric Properties of the Milestones of Recovery Scale-Older Adult Version.

作者信息

Hess Kristen L, Fisher Dennis G, Pilon David, Reynolds Grace L, Ruiz Joe

机构信息

Center for Behavioral Research and Services, California State University Long Beach, 1090 Atlantic Avenue, Long Beach, CA, 90813, USA.

Mental Health America of Los Angeles, 100 W. Broadway #5010, Los Angeles, CA, 90813, USA.

出版信息

Community Ment Health J. 2016 Nov;52(8):1098-1105. doi: 10.1007/s10597-016-9992-7. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1007/s10597-016-9992-7
PMID:26868645
Abstract

The Milestones of Recovery Scale (MORS) is a tool that mental health professionals can use to track clients' recovery. It has been shown to have good reliability and validity in an adult population. It is important to demonstrate its psychometric properties among the elderly. This study assessed the reliability and validity of the MORS among a multi-ethnic (52 % White) sample of adults 54 and older (M = 67) at several mental health agencies in California. The clients, N = 432, were assessed by two raters each at two time points 2 weeks apart. Ratings were obtained on the MORS, the modified Global Assessment of Functioning scale (mGAF), and the Multnomah Community Ability Scale (MCAS). The MORS demonstrated acceptable reliability: inter-rater r = .65 and test-retest r = .71; the mGAF was .56 and .79; the MCAS was .66 and .85. The validity of the MORS was also supported: mGAF-MORS r = .68 and MCAS-MORS r = .74. This study lends support for the use of the MORS in older adult populations. In addition, this is the first report of the psychometric properties of the MCAS with an entirely older adult sample.

摘要

康复里程碑量表(MORS)是一种心理健康专业人员可用于追踪客户康复情况的工具。研究表明,该量表在成年人群体中具有良好的信度和效度。在老年人中验证其心理测量特性很重要。本研究在加利福尼亚州几家心理健康机构对54岁及以上(平均年龄67岁)的多民族(52%为白人)成年样本评估了MORS的信度和效度。共有432名客户参与,由两名评估者在相隔两周的两个时间点分别进行评估。评估内容包括MORS、修订版总体功能评估量表(mGAF)和摩特诺玛社区能力量表(MCAS)。MORS显示出可接受的信度:评估者间相关系数r = 0.65,重测相关系数r = 0.71;mGAF分别为0.56和0.79;MCAS分别为0.66和0.85。MORS的效度也得到了支持:mGAF与MORS的相关系数r = 0.68,MCAS与MORS的相关系数r = 0.74。本研究为在老年人群体中使用MORS提供了支持。此外,这是关于MCAS在完全由老年人组成的样本中的心理测量特性的首份报告。

相似文献

1
Psychometric Properties of the Milestones of Recovery Scale-Older Adult Version.康复里程碑量表老年版的心理测量学特性。
Community Ment Health J. 2016 Nov;52(8):1098-1105. doi: 10.1007/s10597-016-9992-7. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
2
Psychometric properties of an assessment for mental health recovery programs.心理健康康复项目评估的心理测量特性。
Community Ment Health J. 2009 Aug;45(4):246-50. doi: 10.1007/s10597-009-9213-8. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
3
Validity, reliability, acceptability, and utility of the Social Inclusion Questionnaire User Experience (SInQUE): a clinical tool to facilitate social inclusion amongst people with severe mental health problems.社会包容问卷用户体验(SInQUE)的有效性、可靠性、可接受性和实用性:一种促进严重精神健康问题患者社会包容的临床工具。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;55(7):953-964. doi: 10.1007/s00127-019-01826-3. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
4
Investigating the reliability and validity of the Dutch versions of the illness management and recovery scales among clients with mental disorders.调查精神障碍患者使用荷兰语版疾病管理和康复量表的信度和效度。
J Ment Health. 2017 Dec;26(6):489-495. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2015.1124398. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
5
Psychometric properties of the dual-disorder treatment fidelity scale: inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity.双相障碍治疗依从性量表的心理测量学特性:评分者间信度和同时效度。
Community Ment Health J. 2009 Jun;45(3):171-8. doi: 10.1007/s10597-008-9167-2. Epub 2008 Oct 11.
6
Adaptation and psychometric assessment of the Hebrew version of the Recovery Promoting Relationships Scale (RPRS).康复促进关系量表(RPRS)希伯来语版本的改编及心理测量评估。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2014 Mar;37(1):31-36. doi: 10.1037/prj0000043. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
7
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: scale development.慢性精神疾病患者康复评估量表(RAS)的日语版的信度和效度:量表编制。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):314-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
8
Development of a social inclusion index to capture subjective and objective life domains (Phase II): psychometric development study.发展一个社会包容指数来捕捉主观和客观的生活领域(第二阶段):心理测量发展研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(1):iii-vii, ix-xii, -1-241. doi: 10.3310/hta16010.
9
A test of the reliability and validity of the Multnomah Community Ability Scale.《马尔特诺马社区能力量表》的信效度检验。
Community Ment Health J. 2001 Apr;37(2):157-68. doi: 10.1023/a:1002713816110.
10
An expanded version of the Multnomah Community Ability Scale: anchors and interview probes for the assessment of adults with serious mental illness.《马尔特诺马社区能力量表》扩展版:用于评估重度精神疾病成年人的锚定标准及访谈探针
Community Ment Health J. 2003 Apr;39(2):131-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1022610620391.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Associated with Changes in Community Ability and Recovery After Psychiatric Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Study.精神康复后社区能力变化及恢复的相关因素:一项回顾性研究
Community Ment Health J. 2018 Nov;54(8):1221-1227. doi: 10.1007/s10597-018-0249-5. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale in clinical outpatients with depressive disorders.抑郁障碍门诊患者的总体功能评估量表的信度和效度。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Apr;18(2):502-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01614.x. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
2
Psychometric properties of an assessment for mental health recovery programs.心理健康康复项目评估的心理测量特性。
Community Ment Health J. 2009 Aug;45(4):246-50. doi: 10.1007/s10597-009-9213-8. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
3
Patterns of recovery from severe mental illness: a pilot study of outcomes.
严重精神疾病康复模式:一项结局的初步研究。
Community Ment Health J. 2010 Apr;46(2):177-87. doi: 10.1007/s10597-009-9211-x. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
4
Approaches and tools for measuring disability in low and middle-income countries.低收入和中等收入国家残疾测量的方法与工具。
Lepr Rev. 2008 Mar;79(1):50-64.
5
Are GAF scores reliable in routine clinical use?在常规临床应用中,总体功能评估(GAF)分数可靠吗?
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2007 Apr;115(4):326-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00925.x.
6
Proxies and other external raters: methodological considerations.代理人及其他外部评估者:方法学考量
Health Serv Res. 2005 Oct;40(5 Pt 2):1676-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00447.x.
7
Reliability of global assessment of functioning ratings made by clinical psychiatric staff.临床精神科工作人员进行的功能总体评估评分的可靠性。
Psychiatr Serv. 2005 Apr;56(4):434-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.56.4.434.
8
Externalizing and internalizing subtypes of combat-related PTSD: a replication and extension using the PSY-5 scales.与战斗相关的创伤后应激障碍的外化和内化亚型:使用PSY-5量表的复制与扩展
J Abnorm Psychol. 2004 Nov;113(4):636-45. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.113.4.636.
9
Assessing disability in older patients with schizophrenia: results from the WHODAS-II.评估老年精神分裂症患者的残疾状况:世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版(WHODAS-II)的结果
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2004 Jun;192(6):405-13. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000130133.32276.83.
10
Consensus statement on the upcoming crisis in geriatric mental health: research agenda for the next 2 decades.关于老年心理健康即将到来的危机的共识声明:未来二十年的研究议程。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999 Sep;56(9):848-53. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.56.9.848.