• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
ReCAP: Detection of Potentially Avoidable Harm in Oncology From Patient Medical Records.ReCAP:从患者病历中检测肿瘤学中的潜在可避免伤害。
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Feb;12(2):178-9; e224-30. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.006874.
2
Preventable and mitigable adverse events in cancer care: Measuring risk and harm across the continuum.癌症护理中可预防和可减轻的不良事件:衡量整个连续过程中的风险和危害。
Cancer. 2017 Dec 1;123(23):4728-4736. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30916. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
3
Detection of adverse events in an acute geriatric hospital over a 6-year period using the Global Trigger Tool.使用全球触发工具检测急性老年医院 6 年期间的不良事件。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 May;62(5):896-900. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12774. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
4
Development of a trigger tool to identify adverse events and no-harm incidents that affect patients admitted to home healthcare.开发一种触发工具,以识别影响到接受家庭医疗保健患者的不良事件和无伤害事件。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Jul;27(7):502-511. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006755. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
5
Adverse events in patients in home healthcare: a retrospective record review using trigger tool methodology.居家医疗患者的不良事件:使用触发工具方法进行的回顾性记录审查
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 3;8(1):e019267. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019267.
6
Comparison of traditional trigger tool to data warehouse based screening for identifying hospital adverse events.传统触发工具与数据仓库筛查在识别医院不良事件中的比较。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Feb;22(2):130-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001102. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
7
Performance of a Trigger Tool for Identifying Adverse Events in Oncology.用于识别肿瘤学不良事件的触发工具的性能
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Mar;13(3):e223-e230. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.016634. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
8
Incidence of adverse events in Sweden during 2013-2016: a cohort study describing the implementation of a national trigger tool.2013 - 2016年瑞典不良事件的发生率:一项描述国家触发工具实施情况的队列研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 30;8(3):e020833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020833.
9
Does adding an appended oncology module to the Global Trigger Tool increase its value?在全球触发工具中添加附加的肿瘤学模块会增加其价值吗?
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Oct;26(5):553-60. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu072. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
10
The occurrence, types, consequences and preventability of in-hospital adverse events - a scoping review.住院不良事件的发生率、类型、后果及可预防性——一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 4;18(1):521. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3335-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences of the development and use of a Paediatric Oncology Trigger Tool.儿科肿瘤触发工具的开发与使用经验
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 May 15;14(2):e003306. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003306.
2
Association between cancer-specific adverse event triggers and mortality: A validation study.癌症特异性不良事件触发因素与死亡率的相关性:一项验证研究。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jun;9(12):4447-4459. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3033. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
3
Developing a cancer-specific trigger tool to identify treatment-related adverse events using administrative data.开发一种癌症特异性触发工具,以使用行政数据识别与治疗相关的不良事件。
Cancer Med. 2020 Feb;9(4):1462-1472. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2812. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
4
Preventable and mitigable adverse events in cancer care: Measuring risk and harm across the continuum.癌症护理中可预防和可减轻的不良事件:衡量整个连续过程中的风险和危害。
Cancer. 2017 Dec 1;123(23):4728-4736. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30916. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
5
Performance of a Trigger Tool for Identifying Adverse Events in Oncology.用于识别肿瘤学不良事件的触发工具的性能
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Mar;13(3):e223-e230. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.016634. Epub 2017 Jan 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Induction chemoradiation in stage IIIA/N2 non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase 3 randomised trial.诱导化疗联合放化疗治疗 IIIA/N2 期非小细胞肺癌:一项 3 期随机试验。
Lancet. 2015 Sep 12;386(9998):1049-56. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60294-X. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
2
Patient safety across disciplines: radiation oncology incident learning system.跨学科的患者安全:放射肿瘤学事件学习系统
J Oncol Pract. 2015 May;11(3):202-3. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.004341. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
3
Validation of triggers and development of a pediatric trigger tool to identify adverse events.验证触发因素并开发用于识别不良事件的儿科触发工具。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 21;14:655. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0655-5.
4
Does adding an appended oncology module to the Global Trigger Tool increase its value?在全球触发工具中添加附加的肿瘤学模块会增加其价值吗?
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Oct;26(5):553-60. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu072. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
5
National trends in patient safety for four common conditions, 2005-2011.2005-2011 年四种常见疾病的患者安全国家趋势。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 23;370(4):341-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1300991.
6
National trends in hospital-acquired preventable adverse events after major cancer surgery in the USA.美国主要癌症手术后医院获得性可预防不良事件的全国趋势。
BMJ Open. 2013 Jun 26;3(6):e002843. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002843.
7
Assessment of the global trigger tool to measure, monitor and evaluate patient safety in cancer patients: reliability concerns are raised.评估全球触发工具以衡量、监测和评估癌症患者的患者安全:可靠性令人担忧。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Jul;22(7):571-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001219. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
8
Phase II randomized study of trastuzumab emtansine versus trastuzumab plus docetaxel in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer.曲妥珠单抗-美坦新偶联物对比曲妥珠单抗联合多西他赛用于人表皮生长因子受体 2 阳性转移性乳腺癌的 II 期随机研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Mar 20;31(9):1157-63. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.9694. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
9
Cediranib with mFOLFOX6 versus bevacizumab with mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a double-blind, randomized phase III study (HORIZON III).西地尼布联合 mFOLFOX6 对比贝伐珠单抗联合 mFOLFOX6 一线治疗晚期结直肠癌的双盲、随机 III 期研究(HORIZON III)。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Oct 10;30(29):3588-95. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.5355. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
10
Randomized phase III study of thoracic radiation in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin with or without thalidomide in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: the ECOG 3598 study.随机 III 期研究:紫杉醇和卡铂联合胸放疗与或不联合沙利度胺治疗 III 期非小细胞肺癌患者:ECOG3598 研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb 20;30(6):616-22. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.9116. Epub 2012 Jan 23.

ReCAP:从患者病历中检测肿瘤学中的潜在可避免伤害。

ReCAP: Detection of Potentially Avoidable Harm in Oncology From Patient Medical Records.

机构信息

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Columbia University Medical Center; AIG, New York, NY; Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA; Pascal Metrics, Washington, DC; University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; and Genentech, San Francisco, CA

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Columbia University Medical Center; AIG, New York, NY; Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA; Pascal Metrics, Washington, DC; University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; and Genentech, San Francisco, CA.

出版信息

J Oncol Pract. 2016 Feb;12(2):178-9; e224-30. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.006874.

DOI:10.1200/JOP.2015.006874
PMID:26869656
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5486447/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Widespread consensus exists about the importance of addressing patient safety issues in oncology, yet our understanding of the frequency, spectrum, and preventability of adverse events (AEs) across cancer care is limited.

METHODS

We developed a screening tool to detect AEs across cancer care settings through medical record review. Members of the study team reviewed the scientific literature and obtained structured input from an external multidisciplinary panel of clinicians by using a modified Delphi process.

RESULTS

The screening tool comprises 76 triggers-readily identifiable findings to screen for possible AEs that occur during cancer care. Categories of triggers are general care, vital signs, medication related, laboratory tests, other orders, and consultations.

CONCLUSION

Although additional testing is required to assess its performance characteristics, this tool may offer an efficient mechanism for identifying possibly preventable AEs in oncology and serve as an instrument for quality improvement.

摘要

目的

人们普遍认识到在肿瘤学中解决患者安全问题的重要性,但我们对癌症治疗过程中不良事件(AE)的频率、范围和可预防程度的了解有限。

方法

我们开发了一种筛选工具,通过病历回顾来检测癌症治疗环境中的 AE。研究团队成员查阅了科学文献,并通过使用改良 Delphi 流程从外部多学科临床医生小组获得了结构化的投入。

结果

该筛选工具包含 76 个触发因素——易于识别的发现,用于筛查癌症治疗过程中可能发生的 AE。触发因素的类别包括一般护理、生命体征、与药物相关、实验室检查、其他医嘱和会诊。

结论

尽管还需要进一步的测试来评估其性能特征,但该工具可能为识别肿瘤学中可能可预防的 AE 提供一种有效的机制,并作为质量改进的工具。