Ward Lauren F, Enders Jeffrey R, Bell David S, Cramer Hugh M, Wallace Frank N, McIntire Gregory L
Ameritox Ltd, 486 Gallimore Dairy Road, Greensboro, NC 27409, USA
Ameritox Ltd, 486 Gallimore Dairy Road, Greensboro, NC 27409, USA.
J Anal Toxicol. 2016 May;40(4):255-63. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkw005. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
To determine the true enantiomeric composition of methamphetamine urine drug testing results, chiral separation of dextro (D) and levo (L) enantiomers is necessary. While enantiomeric separation of methamphetamine has traditionally been accomplished using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), chiral separation of D- and L-methamphetamine by chiral stationary phase (CSP) liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) has proved more reliable. Chirally selective detection of methamphetamine by GC-MS is often performed using L-N-trifluoroacetyl-prolyl chloride (TPC). L-TPC, a chiral compound, is known to have impurities that can affect the chiral composition percentages of the methamphetamine sample, potentially leading to inaccurate patient results. The comparative analysis of the samples run by GC and LC methods showed preferential bias of the GC method for producing error rates, consistent with previous research, of 8-19%. The CSP-LC-MS-MS method produces percent deviation errors of <2%. Additionally, the GC method failed to produce results that were 100% D- or L-isomer even for enantiomerically pure standards. A higher rate of D- and L-methamphetamine isomer racemization is seen in samples when analyzed by GC-MS using L-TPC-derivatizing agent. This racemization is not seen when these samples are tested with CSP-LC-MS-MS. Thus, a more accurate method of enantiomeric analysis is provided by CSP-LC-MS-MS.
为确定甲基苯丙胺尿液药物检测结果的真正对映体组成,有必要对右旋(D)和左旋(L)对映体进行手性分离。虽然传统上甲基苯丙胺的对映体分离是使用气相色谱 - 质谱联用仪(GC - MS)完成的,但通过手性固定相(CSP)液相色谱 - 质谱联用仪/质谱联用仪(LC - MS - MS)对D - 和L - 甲基苯丙胺进行手性分离已被证明更可靠。通过GC - MS对手性选择性检测甲基苯丙胺通常使用L - N - 三氟乙酰 - 脯氨酰氯(TPC)。L - TPC是一种手性化合物,已知含有会影响甲基苯丙胺样品手性组成百分比的杂质,这可能导致患者检测结果不准确。通过GC和LC方法运行的样品的对比分析表明,GC方法在产生错误率方面存在优先偏差,与先前的研究一致,错误率为8 - 19%。CSP - LC - MS - MS方法产生的百分比偏差误差<2%。此外,即使对于对映体纯的标准品,GC方法也未能产生100% D - 或L - 异构体的结果。当使用L - TPC衍生剂通过GC - MS分析样品时,会观察到更高比例的D - 和L - 甲基苯丙胺异构体消旋化。当用CSP - LC - MS - MS检测这些样品时,未观察到这种消旋化。因此,CSP - LC - MS - MS提供了一种更准确的对映体分析方法。