Vanthournout Bram, Greve Michelle, Bruun Anne, Bechsgaard Jesper, Overgaard Johannes, Bilde Trine
Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Bioscience, Aarhus UniversityAarhus, Denmark; Department of Plant Science, University of PretoriaHatfield, South Africa.
Front Physiol. 2016 Feb 2;7:18. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00018. eCollection 2016.
Group living carries a price: it inherently entails increased competition for resources and reproduction, and may also be associated with mating among relatives, which carries costs of inbreeding. Nonetheless, group living and sociality is found in many animals, and understanding the direct and indirect benefits of cooperation that override the inherent costs remains a challenge in evolutionary ecology. Individuals in groups may benefit from more efficient management of energy or water reserves, for example in the form of reduced water or heat loss from groups of animals huddling, or through reduced energy demands afforded by shared participation in tasks. We investigated the putative benefits of group living in the permanently social spider Stegodyphus dumicola by comparing the effect of group size on standard metabolic rate, lipid/protein content as a body condition measure, feeding efficiency, per capita web investment, and weight/water loss and survival during desiccation. Because energetic expenditure is temperature sensitive, some assays were performed under varying temperature conditions. We found that feeding efficiency increased with group size, and the rate of weight loss was higher in solitary individuals than in animals in groups of various sizes during desiccation. Interestingly, this was not translated into differences in survival or in standard metabolic rate. We did not detect any group size effects for other parameters, and group size effects did not co-vary with experimental temperature in a predictive manner. Both feeding efficiency and mass loss during desiccation are relevant ecological factors as the former results in lowered predator exposure time, and the latter benefits social spiders which occupy arid, hot environments.
从本质上讲,它必然会导致对资源和繁殖的竞争加剧,而且还可能与近亲交配有关,而近亲交配会带来近亲繁殖的成本。尽管如此,许多动物中都存在群居和社会性,而理解合作所带来的直接和间接利益如何超过其内在成本,仍然是进化生态学中的一项挑战。群体中的个体可能会从能量或水分储备的更有效管理中受益,例如,动物挤在一起时水分或热量损失减少,或者通过共同参与任务而降低能量需求。我们通过比较群体大小对标准代谢率、作为身体状况指标的脂质/蛋白质含量、摄食效率、人均织网投入以及干燥期间的体重/水分损失和存活率的影响,研究了永久群居的蜘蛛——南非壁钱(Stegodyphus dumicola)群居的假定益处。由于能量消耗对温度敏感,一些实验是在不同温度条件下进行的。我们发现,摄食效率随群体大小增加,在干燥期间,单独个体的体重减轻速度比不同大小群体中的动物更快。有趣的是,这并没有转化为存活率或标准代谢率的差异。我们没有检测到其他参数存在群体大小效应,并且群体大小效应也没有以可预测的方式随实验温度共同变化。摄食效率和干燥期间的质量损失都是相关的生态因素,因为前者会减少被捕食的暴露时间,而后者对栖息在干旱、炎热环境中的群居蜘蛛有益。