• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会情境中注意力的两种极性:从关注他人到关注自我。

Two Polarities of Attention in Social Contexts: From Attending-to-Others to Attending-to-Self.

作者信息

Kuang Shenbing

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 1;7:63. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00063. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00063
PMID:26869965
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4734343/
Abstract

Social attention is one special form of attention that involves the allocation of limited processing resources in a social context. Previous studies on social attention often regard how attention is directed toward socially relevant stimuli such as faces and gaze directions of other individuals. In contrast to attending-to-others, a different line of researches has shown that self-related information such as own face and name automatically captures attention and is preferentially processed comparing to other-related information. These contrasting behavioral effects between attending-to-others and attending-to-self prompt me to consider a synthetic viewpoint for understanding social attention. I propose that social attention operates at two polarizing states: In one extreme, individual tends to attend to the self and prioritize self-related information over others', and, in the other extreme, attention is allocated to other individuals to infer their intentions and desires. Attending-to-self and attending-to-others mark the two ends of an otherwise continuum spectrum of social attention. For a given behavioral context, the mechanisms underlying these two polarities will interact and compete with each other in order to determine a saliency map of social attention that guides our behaviors. An imbalanced competition between these two behavioral and cognitive processes will cause cognitive disorders and neurological symptoms such as autism spectrum disorders and Williams syndrome. I have reviewed both behavioral and neural evidence that support the notion of polarized social attention, and have suggested several testable predictions to corroborate this integrative theory for understanding social attention.

摘要

社会注意力是注意力的一种特殊形式,它涉及在社会情境中有限加工资源的分配。以往关于社会注意力的研究通常关注注意力如何指向与社会相关的刺激,如他人的面部和注视方向。与关注他人不同,另一系列研究表明,诸如自己的面部和名字等与自我相关的信息会自动吸引注意力,并且与其他相关信息相比,会得到优先加工。关注他人和关注自我之间这些相互矛盾的行为效应促使我考虑一种综合的观点来理解社会注意力。我提出社会注意力在两种极化状态下运作:在一个极端情况下,个体倾向于关注自我,并将与自我相关的信息置于他人相关信息之上;而在另一个极端情况下,注意力被分配给其他个体以推断他们的意图和欲望。关注自我和关注他人标志着社会注意力连续谱的两端。对于给定的行为情境,这两种极性背后的机制将相互作用和竞争,以确定引导我们行为的社会注意力显著性图谱。这两种行为和认知过程之间的不平衡竞争将导致认知障碍和神经症状,如自闭症谱系障碍和威廉姆斯综合征。我回顾了支持极化社会注意力概念的行为和神经证据,并提出了几个可检验的预测,以证实这种用于理解社会注意力的综合理论。

相似文献

1
Two Polarities of Attention in Social Contexts: From Attending-to-Others to Attending-to-Self.社会情境中注意力的两种极性:从关注他人到关注自我。
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 1;7:63. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00063. eCollection 2016.
2
Atypical development of spontaneous social cognition in autism spectrum disorders.自闭症谱系障碍中自发社会认知的非典型发展。
Brain Dev. 2013 Feb;35(2):96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
3
Adaptation to different communicative contexts: an eye tracking study of autistic adults.适应不同的交际语境:自闭症成年人的眼动研究。
J Neurodev Disord. 2019 Apr 13;11(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s11689-019-9265-1.
4
Cognitive-behavioral models of social anxiety disorder.社交焦虑障碍的认知行为模型。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2001 Dec;24(4):753-71. doi: 10.1016/s0193-953x(05)70261-6.
5
A functional but atypical self: Influence of self-relevant processing on the gaze cueing effect in autism spectrum disorder.一种功能性但非典型的自我:自我相关加工对自闭症谱系障碍中注视线索效应的影响。
Autism Res. 2018 Nov;11(11):1522-1531. doi: 10.1002/aur.2019. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
6
That looks familiar: attention allocation to familiar and unfamiliar faces in children with autism spectrum disorder.这看起来很熟悉:自闭症谱系障碍儿童对熟悉和不熟悉面孔的注意力分配。
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2014;19(6):554-69. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2014.943365. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
7
Brief social attention bias modification for children with autism spectrum disorder.对自闭症谱系障碍儿童进行短暂的社会注意力偏见修正。
Autism Res. 2019 Mar;12(3):527-535. doi: 10.1002/aur.2067. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
8
Spontaneous attention to faces in Asperger syndrome using ecologically valid static stimuli.使用具有生态有效性的静态刺激物对阿斯伯格综合征中面孔的自发性注意。
Autism. 2013 Nov;17(6):754-61. doi: 10.1177/1362361312456746. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
9
Social Cognition through the Lens of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience.社会认知的认知和临床神经科学视角。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Sep 13;2018:4283427. doi: 10.1155/2018/4283427. eCollection 2018.
10
Social affiliation motives modulate spontaneous learning in Williams syndrome but not in autism.社会归属动机调节威廉姆斯综合征患者的自发学习,但对自闭症患者则不然。
Mol Autism. 2016 Sep 7;7(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13229-016-0101-0. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Autism and Williams syndrome: truly mirror conditions in the socio-cognitive domain?自闭症与威廉姆斯综合征:在社会认知领域真的是镜像病症吗?
Int J Dev Disabil. 2020 Sep 10;68(4):399-415. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2020.1817717. eCollection 2022.
2
The 'Narcissus Effect': Top-down alpha-beta band modulation of face-related brain areas during self-face processing.“水仙花效应”:自我面孔加工过程中,自上而下的 alpha-beta 频段调制与面孔相关脑区的活动。
Neuroimage. 2020 Jun;213:116754. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116754. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
3
Distinct forms of motion sensitivity impairments in Alzheimer's disease.阿尔茨海默病中运动敏感性损伤的不同形式。
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 10;9(1):12931. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48942-3.
4
Motion-induced position shift in early Alzheimer's disease.运动诱导的早期阿尔茨海默病患者位置移动。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 29;8(1):9833. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27991-0.
5
Disrupted pursuit compensation during self-motion perception in early Alzheimer's disease.早期阿尔茨海默病患者在自我运动感知过程中追踪补偿受损。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 22;7(1):4049. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04377-2.
6
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Temporoparietal Junction and Inferior Frontal Cortex Improves Imitation-Inhibition and Perspective-Taking with no Effect on the Autism-Spectrum Quotient Score.经颅直流电刺激颞顶联合区和额下回可改善模仿抑制和换位思考能力,且对自闭症谱系商数评分无影响。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 May 9;11:84. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00084. eCollection 2017.
7
Altered motion repulsion in Alzheimer's disease.阿尔茨海默病中的运动反应改变。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 20;7:40946. doi: 10.1038/srep40946.
8
The Attentional Dependence of Emotion Cognition Is Variable with the Competing Task.情绪认知的注意依赖性会因竞争任务而变化。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2016 Nov 15;10:219. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00219. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Dissociating hyper and hypoself biases to a core self-representation.将超自我和低自我偏差与核心自我表征区分开来。
Cortex. 2015 Sep;70:202-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.024. Epub 2015 May 15.
2
Attentional control and the self: The Self-Attention Network (SAN).注意力控制与自我:自我注意网络(SAN)。
Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jan-Oct;7(1-4):5-17. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2015.1044427. Epub 2015 May 21.
3
Do I have my attention? Speed of processing advantages for the self-face are not driven by automatic attention capture.我引起了自己的注意吗?对自我面孔的加工速度优势并非由自动注意捕获驱动。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 22;9(10):e110792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110792. eCollection 2014.
4
Visual social attention in autism spectrum disorder: insights from eye tracking studies.自闭症谱系障碍中的视觉社交注意力:来自眼动追踪研究的见解
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 May;42:279-97. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.03.013. Epub 2014 Mar 30.
5
Coupling social attention to the self forms a network for personal significance.将社会注意力与自我联系起来,形成了个人意义的网络。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 May 7;110(19):7607-12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221862110. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
6
The cognitive advantage for one's own name is not simply familiarity: an eye-tracking study.自身名字的认知优势不仅仅在于熟悉度:一项眼动追踪研究。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Dec;20(6):1176-80. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0426-z.
7
The social phenotype of Williams syndrome.威廉斯综合征的社会表型。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013 Jun;23(3):414-22. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.12.006. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
8
Visual cognition during real social interaction.真实社交互动中的视觉认知。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jun 29;6:196. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00196. eCollection 2012.
9
The neuropsychology of face perception: beyond simple dissociations and functional selectivity.面孔知觉的神经心理学:超越简单的分离和功能选择性。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 12;366(1571):1726-38. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0349.
10
Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading.镜像神经元与心理解读的模拟理论。
Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 Dec 1;2(12):493-501. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01262-5.