Ju-Kun Song, Yuan Dong-Bo, Rao Hao-Fu, Chen Tian-Fei, Luan Bo-Shi, Xu Xiao-Ming, Jiang Fu-Neng, Zhong Wei-De, Zhu Jian-Guo
From the Department of Oral and maxillofacial surgery (SJ-K), Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou; Department of Urology (D-BY, H-FR, T-FC, B-SL, J-GZ), Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guizhou, Guiyang; Department of Urology (X-MX), Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo; Department of Urology (F-NJ, W-DZ, J-GZ), Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guangzhou; and Urology Key Laboratory of Guangdong Province (F-NJ, W-DZ, J-GZ), The First Affiliated, Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(6):e2708. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002708.
Several observational studies on the association between Cd exposure and risk of prostate cancer have yielded inconsistent results. To address this issue, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the correlation between Cd exposure and risk of prostate cancer.Relevant studies in PubMed and Embase databases were retrieved until October 2015. We compared the highest and lowest meta-analyses to quantitatively evaluate the relationship between Cd exposure and risk of prostate cancer. Summary estimates were obtained using a random-effects model.In the general population, high Cd exposure was not associated with increased prostate cancer (OR 1.21; 95% CI 0.91-1.64), whereas the combined standardized mortality ratio of the association between Cd exposure and risk of prostate cancer was 1.66 (95% CI 1.10-2.50) in populations exposed to occupational Cd. In addition, high D-Cd intake (OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.96-1.20) and U-Cd concentration (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.48-1.55) among the general population was not related to the increased risk of prostate cancer. In the dose analysis, the summary relative risk was 1.07 (95% CI 0.73-1.57) for each 0.5 μg/g creatinine increase in U-Cd and 1.02 (95% CI 0.99-1.06) for each 10 μg/day increase of dietary Cd intake. However, compared with nonoccupational exposure, high occupational Cd exposure may be associated with the increased risk of prostate cancer.This meta-analysis suggests high Cd exposure as a risk factor for prostate cancer in occupational rather than nonoccupational populations. However, these results should be carefully interpreted because of the significant heterogeneity among studies. Additional large-scale and high-quality prospective studies are needed to confirm the association between Cd exposure and risk of prostate cancer.
几项关于镉暴露与前列腺癌风险之间关联的观察性研究得出了不一致的结果。为解决这一问题,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估镉暴露与前列腺癌风险之间的相关性。检索了PubMed和Embase数据库中截至2015年10月的相关研究。我们比较了最高和最低的荟萃分析,以定量评估镉暴露与前列腺癌风险之间的关系。使用随机效应模型获得汇总估计值。在一般人群中,高镉暴露与前列腺癌风险增加无关(OR 1.21;95%CI 0.91 - 1.64),而在职业性镉暴露人群中,镉暴露与前列腺癌风险之间关联的合并标准化死亡率比为1.66(95%CI 1.10 - 2.50)。此外,一般人群中高膳食镉摄入量(OR 1.07;95%CI 0.96 - 1.20)和尿镉浓度(OR 0.86;95%CI 0.48 - 1.55)与前列腺癌风险增加无关。在剂量分析中,尿镉每增加0.5μg/g肌酐,汇总相对风险为1.07(95%CI 0.73 - 1.57),膳食镉摄入量每增加10μg/天,汇总相对风险为1.02(95%CI 0.99 - 1.06)。然而,与非职业暴露相比,高职业性镉暴露可能与前列腺癌风险增加有关。这项荟萃分析表明,高镉暴露是职业人群而非非职业人群中前列腺癌的一个风险因素。然而,由于研究之间存在显著异质性,这些结果应谨慎解读。需要更多大规模、高质量的前瞻性研究来证实镉暴露与前列腺癌风险之间的关联。