Dalili Hosein, Sheikh Mahdi, Hardani Amir Kamal, Nili Firouzeh, Shariat Mamak, Nayeri Fatemeh
Breastfeeding Research Center, Vali-asr Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Research Center, Vali-asr Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 12;11(2):e0149464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149464. eCollection 2016.
Assessing the value of the Combined-Apgar score in predicting neonatal mortality and morbidity compared to the Conventional-Apgar.
This prospective cohort study evaluated 942 neonates (166 very preterm, 233 near term, and 543 term) admitted to a tertiary referral hospital. At 1- and 5-minutes after delivery, the Conventional and Combined Apgar scores were recorded. The neonates were followed, and the following information was recorded: the occurrence of severe hyperbilirubinemia requiring medical intervention, the requirement for mechanical ventilation, the occurrence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), and neonatal mortality.
Before adjusting for the potential confounders, a low Conventional (<7) or Combined (<10) Apgar score at 5-minutes was associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. However, after adjustment for the gestational age, birth weight and the requirement for neonatal resuscitation in the delivery room, a depressed 5-minute Conventional-Apgar score lost its significant associations with all the measured adverse outcomes; after the adjustments, a low 5-minute Combined-Apgar score remained significantly associated with the requirement for mechanical ventilation (OR,18.61; 95%CI,6.75-51.29), IVH (OR,4.8; 95%CI,1.91-12.01), and neonatal mortality (OR,20.22; 95%CI,4.22-96.88). Additionally, using Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves, the area under the curve was higher for the Combined-Apgar than the Conventional-Apgar for the prediction of neonatal mortality and the measured morbidities among all the admitted neonates and their gestational age subgroups.
The newly proposed Combined-Apgar score can be a good predictor of neonatal mortality and morbidity in the admitted neonates, regardless of their gestational age and resuscitation status. It is also superior to the Conventional-Apgar in predicting adverse neonatal outcomes in very preterm, near term and term neonates.
评估联合阿氏评分在预测新生儿死亡率和发病率方面相对于传统阿氏评分的价值。
这项前瞻性队列研究评估了一所三级转诊医院收治的942例新生儿(166例极早产儿、233例近足月儿和543例足月儿)。在分娩后1分钟和5分钟时,记录传统阿氏评分和联合阿氏评分。对新生儿进行随访,并记录以下信息:需要医学干预的重度高胆红素血症的发生情况、机械通气需求、脑室内出血(IVH)的发生情况以及新生儿死亡率。
在对潜在混杂因素进行调整之前,5分钟时低传统阿氏评分(<7)或低联合阿氏评分(<10)与不良新生儿结局相关。然而,在对胎龄、出生体重和产房内新生儿复苏需求进行调整后,5分钟时降低的传统阿氏评分与所有测量的不良结局失去了显著相关性;调整后,5分钟时低联合阿氏评分仍与机械通气需求(比值比[OR],18.61;95%置信区间[CI],6.75 - 51.29)、IVH(OR,4.8;95%CI,1.91 - 12.01)和新生儿死亡率(OR,20.22;95%CI,4.22 - 96.88)显著相关。此外,使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,在预测所有入院新生儿及其胎龄亚组的新生儿死亡率和测量的发病率方面,联合阿氏评分的曲线下面积高于传统阿氏评分。
新提出的联合阿氏评分可以很好地预测入院新生儿的死亡率和发病率,无论其胎龄和复苏状态如何。在预测极早产儿、近足月儿和足月儿的不良新生儿结局方面,它也优于传统阿氏评分。