Ecks Stefan
Anthropol Med. 2005 Dec;12(3):239-54. doi: 10.1080/13648470500291360.
Among practitioners of biomedicine, to speak of people as 'marginalized' often amounts to saying that they do not have access to medical substances. Thus conceived, the best way to remove marginality seems to be to give medicines to those deprived of them. The peculiar relationship between marginality and pharmaceuticals is especially poignant in the case of antidepressant drugs, as these drugs appear to bring the patient 'back into society', but not any society, but middle-class consumer society. What is now special about antidepressants is that there is nothing special about them: antidepressants are like consumer items among thousands of other consumer items. This paper explores the relations between medicines and marginality with reference to the marketing of antidepressant drugs in Kolkata (Calcutta), India. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork in the Kolkata metropolitan area from July 1999 to December 2000 and in August/September 2003, this paper examines how people with depression are constituted as 'marginal' in the sense of 'being deprived of medication', and how the biomedical promise of an effective pharmacological treatment becomes a promise of 'pharmaceutical citizenship'. In view of Bengali notions of mental health as a state of detachment, the paper asks if pharmacological demarginalization holds the same promise in the Indian context that it holds in the West.
在生物医学从业者中,将某些人称为“边缘化群体”往往意味着他们无法获取医疗药物。照此理解,消除边缘化的最佳方式似乎是给那些被剥夺药物的人提供药物。边缘化与药品之间的特殊关系在抗抑郁药物的案例中尤为突出,因为这些药物似乎能让患者“回归社会”,但并非回归任何社会,而是中产阶级消费社会。如今抗抑郁药物的特别之处在于它们并无特别之处:抗抑郁药物就如同成千上万其他消费品中的普通商品。本文以印度加尔各答(旧称)抗抑郁药物的营销为例,探讨药品与边缘化之间的关系。基于1999年7月至2000年12月以及2003年8月/9月在加尔各答大都市区进行的人种志田野调查,本文考察了抑郁症患者如何在“被剥夺药物治疗”的意义上被建构为“边缘化群体”,以及有效的药物治疗在生物医学上的承诺如何变成“药物公民身份”的承诺。鉴于孟加拉人将心理健康视为一种超脱状态的观念,本文提出疑问:在印度语境下,药物去边缘化是否能像在西方那样带来同样的前景。