Khashan Morsi, Lidar Zvi, Salame Khalil, Mangel Laurence, Lador Ran, Drexler Michael, Sapirstein Eilat, Regev Gilad J
Department of Neurosurgery, The Spine Surgery Unit, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Spine Surgery Unit, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Department of Neurosurgery, The Spine Surgery Unit, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
World Neurosurg. 2016 May;89:337-42. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.02.018. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
Minimally invasive spinal decompression for the treatment of spinal stenosis or disk herniation is often indicated if conservative management fails. However, the influence of old age on the risk of postoperative complications and clinical outcome is not well understood. We therefore sought to compare complication rates and outcomes after minimally invasive surgery decompression and discectomy in elderly patients with a cohort of younger patients undergoing similar procedures.
We evaluated medical records of 61 patients older than 75 years and 69 patients younger than 45 years that underwent minimally invasive lumbar decompression between April 2009 and July 2013 at our institute. Medical history, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, perioperative mortality, complications, and revision surgery rates were analyzed. Patient outcomes included visual analog scale and EuroQol-5 Dimension scores.
The average age was 78.66 ± 4.42 years in the elderly group and 33.59 ± 6.7 years in the younger group. No major postoperative complications were recorded in either group, and all recruited patients were still alive at the time of the last follow-up. No statistically significant difference existed in the surgical revision rate between the groups. Both groups showed significant improvement in their outcome scores after surgery.
Our results indicate that minimally invasive decompressive surgery is a safe and effective treatment for elderly patients and does not pose an increased risk of complications. Future prospective studies are necessary to validate the specific advantages of the minimally invasive techniques in the elderly population.
如果保守治疗失败,通常会采用微创脊柱减压术来治疗脊柱狭窄或椎间盘突出症。然而,老年对术后并发症风险和临床结果的影响尚未得到充分了解。因此,我们试图比较老年患者与接受类似手术的年轻患者队列在微创减压手术和椎间盘切除术后的并发症发生率和结果。
我们评估了2009年4月至2013年7月在我院接受微创腰椎减压术的61例75岁以上患者和69例45岁以下患者的病历。分析了病史、美国麻醉医师协会评分、围手术期死亡率、并发症和翻修手术率。患者结果包括视觉模拟量表和欧洲五维健康量表评分。
老年组平均年龄为78.66±4.42岁,年轻组平均年龄为33.59±6.7岁。两组均未记录到重大术后并发症,所有纳入患者在最后一次随访时均存活。两组之间的手术翻修率无统计学显著差异。两组术后结果评分均有显著改善。
我们的结果表明,微创减压手术对老年患者是一种安全有效的治疗方法,不会增加并发症风险。未来需要进行前瞻性研究来验证微创技术在老年人群中的具体优势。