Lorio Sara, Kherif Ferath, Ruef Anne, Melie-Garcia Lester, Frackowiak Richard, Ashburner John, Helms Gunther, Lutti Antoine, Draganski Bodgan
LREN - Department of Clinical Neurosciences, CHUV, University of Lausanne, Lausanne Switzerland.
Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 May;37(5):1801-15. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23137. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
The high gray-white matter contrast and spatial resolution provided by T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has made it a widely used imaging protocol for computational anatomy studies of the brain. While the image intensity in T1-weighted images is predominantly driven by T1, other MRI parameters affect the image contrast, and hence brain morphological measures derived from the data. Because MRI parameters are correlates of different histological properties of brain tissue, this mixed contribution hampers the neurobiological interpretation of morphometry findings, an issue which remains largely ignored in the community. We acquired quantitative maps of the MRI parameters that determine signal intensities in T1-weighted images (R1 (=1/T1), R2 *, and PD) in a large cohort of healthy subjects (n = 120, aged 18-87 years). Synthetic T1-weighted images were calculated from these quantitative maps and used to extract morphometry features-gray matter volume and cortical thickness. We observed significant variations in morphometry measures obtained from synthetic images derived from different subsets of MRI parameters. We also detected a modulation of these variations by age. Our findings highlight the impact of microstructural properties of brain tissue-myelination, iron, and water content-on automated measures of brain morphology and show that microstructural tissue changes might lead to the detection of spurious morphological changes in computational anatomy studies. They motivate a review of previous morphological results obtained from standard anatomical MRI images and highlight the value of quantitative MRI data for the inference of microscopic tissue changes in the healthy and diseased brain. Hum Brain Mapp 37:1801-1815, 2016. © 2016 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
T1加权磁共振成像(MRI)所提供的高灰白质对比度和空间分辨率,使其成为广泛应用于大脑计算解剖学研究的成像方案。虽然T1加权图像中的图像强度主要由T1驱动,但其他MRI参数会影响图像对比度,进而影响从数据中得出的脑形态学测量结果。由于MRI参数与脑组织的不同组织学特性相关,这种混合作用妨碍了形态测量结果的神经生物学解释,而这一问题在该领域很大程度上仍被忽视。我们在一大群健康受试者(n = 120,年龄18 - 87岁)中获取了决定T1加权图像信号强度的MRI参数(R1(=1/T1)、R2 *和PD)的定量图谱。从这些定量图谱计算出合成T1加权图像,并用于提取形态测量特征——灰质体积和皮质厚度。我们观察到,从源自不同MRI参数子集的合成图像中获得的形态测量指标存在显著差异。我们还检测到这些差异受年龄的调节。我们的研究结果突出了脑组织微观结构特性(髓鞘形成、铁含量和含水量)对脑形态自动测量的影响,并表明微观结构组织变化可能导致在计算解剖学研究中检测到虚假的形态变化。这些结果促使人们重新审视以往从标准解剖MRI图像获得的形态学结果,并突出了定量MRI数据对于推断健康和患病大脑微观组织变化的价值。《人类脑图谱》37:1801 - 1815,2016年。© 2016作者。《人类脑图谱》由威利期刊公司出版。