Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2014 Jun;33(2):95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.krcp.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
The composite summary score (range, 0-24) of abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) devised by Kauppila et al is a simple method of assessing AAC severity. However, few studies have been conducted to determine an optimal AAC cutoff score for the prediction of mortality or to investigate the relation between mineral metabolism and AAC progression using the scoring system.
The medical records of 112 patients on hemodialysis who had undergone simple lateral lumbar radiography every 6 months from August 2009 were reviewed. Patients were followed until November 2012, and the relationship between the degree of AAC at baseline and mortality was evaluated. In addition, the relationship between the progression of AAC and serum concentrations of calcium and phosphate was evaluated in the 75 patients who were successfully followed until November 2012.
The mean AAC score at baseline was 5.5±4.8, and the cutoff calcification score for the prediction of mortality was 7.75 (sensitivity=61%, specificity=81%). Patients were allocated to Group A (baseline total calcification score ≤8.0, n=85) or Group B (baseline total calcification score>8.0, n=27), and multivariate analysis showed that Group B was an independent risk factor of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events. Of the 75 patients successfully followed, 51 showed AAC progression (Group 1) and 24 showed no change or improvement (Group 2). Group 1 was found to have significantly higher mean serum corrected calcium levels during the 2(nd) year and 3(rd) year of follow-up than Group 2. Furthermore, repeated-measures analysis of variance showed higher monthly corrected calcium concentrations (P=0.099) and mean corrected calcium levels during the 1(st) year, 2(nd) year, and 3(rd) year of follow-up (P=0.062) in Group 1, but without statistical significance. The cutoff values of mean corrected calcium of the 2(nd) year and 3(rd) year for the prediction of AAC progression during follow-up years were 8.96 mg/dL and 9.45 mg/dL, respectively. Serum phosphate levels and corrected calcium×phosphate values were similar in Groups 1 and 2.
Patients with an AAC score of>8 at baseline seem to be at higher risk of mortality during follow-up. Of the serum variables examined, such as corrected calcium, phosphate, and corrected calcium×phosphate, corrected calcium was found to be marginally associated with AAC progression. However, a larger-scale prospective study is required to confirm our findings.
Kauppila 等人设计的腹主动脉钙化(AAC)综合评分(范围 0-24)是评估 AAC 严重程度的一种简单方法。然而,很少有研究确定最佳 AAC 截断值来预测死亡率,或者使用评分系统来研究矿物质代谢与 AAC 进展之间的关系。
回顾了 2009 年 8 月起每 6 个月接受简单侧位腰椎 X 线检查的 112 例血液透析患者的病历。患者随访至 2012 年 11 月,评估基线时 AAC 程度与死亡率之间的关系。此外,评估了在 75 例成功随访至 2012 年 11 月的患者中,AAC 进展与血清钙和磷浓度之间的关系。
基线时 AAC 评分的平均值为 5.5±4.8,预测死亡率的钙化评分截断值为 7.75(灵敏度=61%,特异性=81%)。患者被分为 A 组(基线总钙化评分≤8.0,n=85)或 B 组(基线总钙化评分>8.0,n=27),多变量分析显示 B 组是全因死亡率和心血管事件的独立危险因素。在 75 例成功随访的患者中,51 例 AAC 进展(组 1),24 例无变化或改善(组 2)。组 1 在随访的第 2 年和第 3 年的平均血清校正钙水平明显高于组 2。此外,重复测量方差分析显示,组 1 在第 1 年、第 2 年和第 3 年的校正钙浓度(P=0.099)和平均校正钙水平较高(P=0.062),但无统计学意义。预测随访期间 AAC 进展的第 2 年和第 3 年平均校正钙的截断值分别为 8.96 mg/dL 和 9.45 mg/dL。组 1 和组 2 的血清磷水平和校正钙×磷值相似。
基线 AAC 评分>8 的患者在随访期间似乎有更高的死亡率风险。在检查的血清变量中,如校正钙、磷和校正钙×磷,校正钙与 AAC 进展呈边缘相关。然而,需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来证实我们的发现。