Tannock I F
Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Radiother Oncol. 1989 Oct;16(2):83-101. doi: 10.1016/0167-8140(89)90025-x.
Combined modality treatment with radiotherapy and chemotherapy is used increasingly for the primary management of a variety of human tumours, with the aim of improving both local and distant control. The present paper reviews methodological issues related to the evaluation of combined modality therapy. Reports that patients have superior outcome in single-arm studies as compared to historical controls treated with radiation alone have limited value because of several types of bias including patient selection, stage migration, the tendency to publish positive results, or inadequate follow-up as compared to the historical series. The observation that response to chemotherapy predicts for survival after combined treatment also conveys no proof that combined treatment is superior to radiation alone. Randomized controlled trials provide the only rigorous method for evaluating combined therapy, but are also subject to misinterpretation. The majority of published trials report negative results but are too small to detect clinically important differences in survival. Even large trials may give spurious results if they seek small benefits of treatment in a spectrum of patients with widely differing prognosis. Some randomized trials have demonstrated improved local control and increased toxicity from combined treatment, a result that might have been achieved by increasing the effective radiation dose. Ideally, combined treatment should be compared with radiotherapy alone at equal levels of normal tissue damage. A review of published data for patients with cancers of the head and neck, lung, gastrointestinal tract and bladder reveals very few trials which have adequately evaluated the role of combined modality therapy (with or without surgery). Most of the large randomized trials have demonstrated no benefit from the use of radiation and chemotherapy, although some of them suggest small therapeutic gains from using thoracic radiation with chemotherapy in small-cell-lung cancer of limited extent, or from combined modality treatment after resection of rectal cancer. Possible reasons for the failure of active drugs to lead to easily detected gains in therapeutic index include insufficient reduction in cell survival from chemotherapy, selective killing of radiosensitive subpopulations, stimulation of the proliferation of surviving cells, or enhancement of metastasis. With the possible exception of radiation and concurrent 5-fluorouracil for squamous cancers of the anal canal, there are no convincing data to mandate the routine combined use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in any of the above sites.
放疗和化疗相结合的综合治疗方法越来越多地用于多种人类肿瘤的初始治疗,目的是提高局部和远处控制率。本文综述了与综合治疗评估相关的方法学问题。单臂研究报告称患者的预后优于单纯接受放疗的历史对照,但由于存在多种偏倚,包括患者选择、分期迁移、发表阳性结果的倾向或与历史系列相比随访不足,其价值有限。化疗反应可预测综合治疗后的生存情况这一观察结果也不能证明综合治疗优于单纯放疗。随机对照试验是评估综合治疗的唯一严谨方法,但也可能被误解。大多数已发表的试验报告的是阴性结果,但规模太小,无法检测出生存方面临床上的重要差异。即使是大型试验,如果在预后差异很大的一系列患者中寻求微小的治疗益处,也可能得出虚假结果。一些随机试验表明综合治疗可改善局部控制并增加毒性,这一结果可能通过增加有效辐射剂量来实现。理想情况下,应在正常组织损伤程度相同的情况下将综合治疗与单纯放疗进行比较。对已发表的头颈部癌、肺癌、胃肠道癌和膀胱癌患者数据的综述显示,很少有试验充分评估了综合治疗(无论是否联合手术)的作用。大多数大型随机试验表明,使用放疗和化疗并无益处,尽管其中一些试验表明,在局限性小细胞肺癌中,胸部放疗联合化疗或直肠癌切除术后进行综合治疗有微小的治疗获益。活性药物未能轻易提高治疗指数的可能原因包括化疗导致的细胞存活率降低不足、对放射敏感亚群的选择性杀伤、存活细胞增殖的刺激或转移的增强。除了放疗联合5-氟尿嘧啶用于肛管鳞癌外,没有令人信服的数据支持在上述任何部位常规联合使用放疗和化疗。