Suppr超能文献

诺氟沙星与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑的比较。一项针对已知患有菌尿症且正在接受经尿道前列腺切除术患者的研究。

Norfloxacin versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. A study in patients with known bacteriuria undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate.

作者信息

Adolfsson J, Köhler C, Falck L

机构信息

Department of Urology, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1989;23(4):255-9. doi: 10.3109/00365598909180334.

Abstract

Three hundred and forty-three patients with suspected bacteriuria undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) were randomized to treatment with either trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) or norfloxacin (NF) for 5 1/2 days beginning the evening prior to operation. It was possible to analyse 165 patients for efficacy. Elimination of bacteria on days 10 to 20 was achieved in 78.1% and 78.3% in the TMP-SMX and NF group, respectively. The accumulated elimination rates for the follow up period (days 10-42) were 68.5% for the TMP-SMX group and 76.2% for the NF group. The differences were not statistically significant. No patient had any clinical signs of upper urinary tract infection or septicemia. Three hundred and twelve patients were analysed for safety. Twenty-six patients reported 32 adverse drug events (ADEs). Four reactions in the TMP-SMX group were considered severe while in the NF group all the ADEs were of mild or moderate intensity. In this study NF seems to be at least as effective and safe as TMP-SMX.

摘要

343例疑似菌尿症且正在接受经尿道前列腺切除术(TUR-P)的患者被随机分为两组,分别接受甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(TMP-SMX)或诺氟沙星(NF)治疗,疗程为5.5天,从手术前一晚开始。共有165例患者可进行疗效分析。在TMP-SMX组和NF组中,第10至20天细菌清除率分别为78.1%和78.3%。随访期(第10至42天)的累计清除率,TMP-SMX组为68.5%,NF组为76.2%。差异无统计学意义。无患者出现上尿路感染或败血症的临床症状。对312例患者进行了安全性分析。26例患者报告了32起药物不良反应(ADEs)。TMP-SMX组有4例反应被认为严重,而NF组所有ADEs均为轻度或中度。在本研究中,NF似乎至少与TMP-SMX一样有效和安全。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验