Suppr超能文献

分散注意力增强外显概念记忆而非内隐概念记忆:对注意力增强效应的项目特异性解释。

Divided attention enhances explicit but not implicit conceptual memory: an item-specific account of the attentional boost effect.

作者信息

Spataro Pietro, Mulligan Neil W, Bechi Gabrielli Giulia, Rossi-Arnaud Clelia

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , University of Rome "Sapienza" , Rome , Italy.

b Department of Psychology , University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill , NC , USA.

出版信息

Memory. 2017 Feb;25(2):170-175. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1144769. Epub 2016 Feb 16.

Abstract

The Attentional Boost Effect (ABE) refers to the counterintuitive finding that words encoded with to-be-responded targets in a divided-attention condition are remembered better than words encoded with distractors. Previous studies suggested that the ABE-related enhancement of verbal memory depends upon the activation of abstract lexical representations. In the present study, we extend this hypothesis by embedding it in the context of a broader perspective, which proposes that divided attention in the ABE paradigm affects item-specific, but not relational, processing. To this purpose, we examined the ABE in the matched tasks of category-cued recall (CCRT: explicit memory) and category exemplar generation (CEGT: implicit memory). In addition, study time was varied (500, 1500 or 4000 ms), to further determine whether the attentional boost manipulation could influence late-phase elaborative processing. In agreement with the predictions of the item-specific account, the results showed that exemplars encoded with targets were recalled better than exemplars encoded with distractors in the CCRT, but not in the CEGT. Moreover, performance in the CCRT increased with study time, whereas the size of the ABE-related enhancement tended to decrease, further confirming that this effect hinges upon early phase encoding processes.

摘要

注意增强效应(ABE)指的是一个与直觉相悖的发现:在分心注意条件下,与待反应目标一起编码的单词比与干扰物一起编码的单词记忆效果更好。先前的研究表明,与ABE相关的言语记忆增强取决于抽象词汇表征的激活。在本研究中,我们将这一假设置于更广阔的视角背景下进行拓展,该视角提出,ABE范式中的分心注意会影响特定项目而非关系的加工。为此,我们在类别线索回忆(CCRT:外显记忆)和类别范例生成(CEGT:内隐记忆)的匹配任务中检验了ABE。此外,还改变了学习时间(500、1500或4000毫秒),以进一步确定注意增强操作是否会影响后期的精细化加工。与特定项目解释的预测一致,结果表明,在CCRT中,与目标一起编码的范例比与干扰物一起编码的范例回忆得更好,但在CEGT中并非如此。此外,CCRT中的表现随学习时间增加,而与ABE相关的增强幅度则趋于减小,这进一步证实了该效应取决于早期编码过程。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验