• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估临床实践中的使能:现有工具的系统评价。

Assessing enablement in clinical practice: a systematic review of available instruments.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Dec;16(6):1301-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01332.x. Epub 2010 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01332.x
PMID:20727059
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3023028/
Abstract

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Enablement is an intervention by which the health care provider recognizes, promotes and enhances patients' ability to control their health and life. An abundant health literature suggests that enablement is associated with good outcomes. In this review, we aimed at identifying and comparing instruments that assess enablement in the health care context.

METHOD

We conducted a systematic literature review using Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Cinahl and PsycINFO databases, 1980 through March 2009, with specific search strategy for each database. Citations were included if they reported: (1) development and/or validation of an instrument; (2) evaluation of enablement in a health care context; and (3) quantitative results following administration of the instrument. The quality of each main retained citation was assessed using a modified version of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy.

RESULTS

Of 3135 citations identified, 53 were retrieved for detailed evaluation. Four articles were included. Two instruments were found: the Patient Empowerment Scale (PES) and the Empowering Speech Practices Scale (ESPS). Both instruments assessed enablement in hospital setting, one from the inpatient's perspective (PES) and the other from both perspectives (ESPS).

CONCLUSION

Two instruments assess enablement in hospital setting. No instrument is currently available to assess enablement in an ambulatory care context.

摘要

背景、目的和目标:赋权是一种干预措施,通过这种措施,医疗服务提供者认识、促进和增强患者控制自己的健康和生活的能力。丰富的健康文献表明,赋权与良好的结果有关。在本次综述中,我们旨在确定和比较评估医疗环境中赋权的工具。

方法

我们使用 Medline、Embase、Cochrane、Cinahl 和 PsycINFO 数据库进行了系统的文献综述,时间范围为 1980 年至 2009 年 3 月,每个数据库都有特定的搜索策略。如果报告了以下内容,则将引文包括在内:(1) 工具的开发和/或验证;(2) 在医疗保健环境中评估赋权;以及 (3) 工具管理后的定量结果。使用诊断准确性报告标准的修改版本评估每个主要保留引文的质量。

结果

在 3135 条引文识别中,有 53 条被检索进行详细评估。有 4 篇文章被纳入。发现了两种工具:患者赋权量表(PES)和赋权演讲实践量表(ESPS)。这两种工具都在医院环境中评估赋权,一种是从住院患者的角度(PES),另一种是从两个角度(ESPS)。

结论

有两种工具评估医院环境中的赋权。目前没有评估门诊护理环境中赋权的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/294f/3023028/f1055483d9ce/jep0016-1301-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/294f/3023028/f1055483d9ce/jep0016-1301-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/294f/3023028/f1055483d9ce/jep0016-1301-f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing enablement in clinical practice: a systematic review of available instruments.评估临床实践中的使能:现有工具的系统评价。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Dec;16(6):1301-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01332.x. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
2
Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients.改善医院住院患者抗生素处方行为的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 9;2(2):CD003543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub4.
3
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
4
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
5
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
6
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
7
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
8
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
10
Strategies for enhancing the implementation of school-based policies or practices targeting risk factors for chronic disease.加强针对慢性病风险因素的校本政策或实践实施的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 29;11(11):CD011677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011677.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient enablement and health-related quality of life for patients with chronic back and knee pain: a cross-sectional study in primary care.慢性腰背和膝关节疼痛患者的赋权及健康相关生活质量:初级保健中的横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Oct 26;73(736):e867-e875. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0546. Print 2023 Nov.
2
Enablement and empowerment among patients participating in a supported osteoarthritis self-management programme - a prospective observational study.参与支持性骨关节炎自我管理计划的患者的赋权 - 一项前瞻性观察研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jun 8;23(1):555. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05457-9.
3
The validity and reliability of the patient enablement instrument (PEI) after GP appointments in Finnish health care centres.

本文引用的文献

1
Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.结构效度:客观测量工具的新发展。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Dec;31(12):1412-1427. doi: 10.1037/pas0000626. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
2
Promoting patient empowerment in the healthcare system: highlighting the need for patient-centered drug policy.促进医疗体系中的患者赋权:强调以患者为中心的药物政策的必要性。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2007 Jun;7(3):281-9. doi: 10.1586/14737167.7.3.281.
3
Measuring empowerment among people with psychotic disorders: a comparison of three instruments.
芬兰医疗保健中心全科医生预约后患者赋能工具(PEI)的有效性和可靠性。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Sep 16;4(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s41687-020-00243-4.
4
Towards a taxonomy of behavior change techniques for promoting shared decision making.促进共享决策的行为改变技术分类学。
Implement Sci. 2020 Aug 20;15(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01015-w.
5
Patient and public engagement in research and health system decision making: A systematic review of evaluation tools.患者和公众参与研究和卫生系统决策:评价工具的系统评价。
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):1075-1084. doi: 10.1111/hex.12804. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
6
Identification, description and appraisal of generic PROMs for primary care: a systematic review.基层医疗中通用患者报告结局测量工具的识别、描述与评估:一项系统综述
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Mar 15;19(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0722-9.
7
Coping better with health problems after a visit to the family physician: associations with patients and physicians characteristics.就诊于家庭医生后对健康问题的应对能力改善:与患者及医生特征的关联
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Feb 7;19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0712-y.
8
Physician Enabling Skills Questionnaire: Validation of a newly developed instrument in primary health care.医生赋能技能问卷:一种新开发的初级卫生保健工具的验证
Can Fam Physician. 2015 Nov;61(11):e517-23.
9
Antenatal care strengthening for improved quality of care in Jimma, Ethiopia: an effectiveness study.加强产前护理以提高埃塞俄比亚吉马的护理质量:一项有效性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 11;15:360. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1708-3.
10
Measuring patients' perceptions of patient-centered care: a systematic review of tools for family medicine.测量患者对以患者为中心的医疗服务的感知:家庭医学工具的系统评价。
Ann Fam Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;9(2):155-64. doi: 10.1370/afm.1226.
测量精神障碍患者的赋权感:三种工具的比较
Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Nov;59(11):1338-42. doi: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.11.1338.
4
Participation in online patient support groups endorses patients' empowerment.参与在线患者支持小组可增强患者的自主权。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Jan;74(1):61-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.044. Epub 2008 Sep 7.
5
Empowerment interventions, knowledge translation and exchange: perspectives of home care professionals, clients and caregivers.赋权干预、知识转化与交流:家庭护理专业人员、客户及照护者的观点
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Aug 20;8:177. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-177.
6
[Psychometric properties of the SESM, Italian version of the "Consumer constructed scale to measure empowerment among users of mental health services" (Rogers et al., 1997)].[SESM的心理测量特性,“用于衡量心理健康服务使用者赋权的消费者构建量表”的意大利语版本(罗杰斯等人,1997年)]
Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2007 Jul-Sep;16(3):256-64.
7
Instruments to assess the perception of physicians in the decision-making process of specific clinical encounters: a systematic review.评估医生在特定临床诊疗决策过程中认知情况的工具:一项系统综述
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2007 Oct 15;7:30. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-7-30.
8
Home health care nurses' perceptions of empowerment.家庭健康护理护士对赋权的认知。
J Community Health Nurs. 2007 Fall;24(3):133-53. doi: 10.1080/07370010701429512.
9
Psychometric properties of the Swedish Diabetes Empowerment Scale.瑞典糖尿病赋权量表的心理测量特性。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2007 Jun;21(2):247-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00463.x.
10
Empowering older people.
Nurs Older People. 2007 Mar;19(2):12-4. doi: 10.7748/nop.19.2.12.s14.