Nettlefold Lindsay, Naylor P J, Warburton Darren E R, Bredin Shannon S D, Race Douglas, McKay Heather A
a Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute.
b University of British Columbia.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2016;87(1):110-23. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2015.1129046.
Patterns of physical activity (PA) and sedentary time, including volume of bouted activity, are important health indicators. However, the effect of accelerometer epoch length on measurement of these patterns and associations with health outcomes in children remain unknown.
We measured activity patterns in 308 children (52% girls, age range = 8-11 years) using ActiGraph GT1M accelerometers with 15-s epochs and reintegrated to 60-s epochs. We calculated the volume (minutes per day) of moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA), sedentary time, light, moderate, and vigorous PA, as well as bouted MVPA and sedentary time (0-5 min, 5-10 min, 10-20 min, and > 20 min).
The difference between 15-s and 60-s epochs was statistically significant for all outcomes; however, effect sizes were small or negligible in 30% of comparisons. Bias ranged from 1.9 min/day (total MVPA) to 102.7 min/day (0-5 min sedentary bouts). Regression-based estimates of bias and 95% limits of agreement illustrated that the magnitude, and in some cases, the direction, of between-epoch differences varied with activity level. Correlations with body mass index and cardiovascular fitness were similar for 15-s (r = -.19 to .20) and 60-s (r = -.16 to .29) epochs. Estimated 15-s data (predicted from 60-s) were similar to measured data and had similar relationships with health outcomes.
Epoch length influences measurement of PA and sedentary patterns and the effect is modified by activity level. However, associations with health outcomes were similar and epoch differences can be adjusted. Future research should clarify the accuracy of different epoch lengths for measuring bouted activity and evaluate whether epoch length alters relationships with additional health outcomes.
身体活动(PA)模式和久坐时间模式,包括单次活动量,是重要的健康指标。然而,加速度计采样时长对这些模式测量的影响以及与儿童健康结局的关联仍不明确。
我们使用ActiGraph GT1M加速度计,以15秒的采样时长测量了308名儿童(52%为女孩,年龄范围8至11岁)的活动模式,并重新整合为60秒的采样时长。我们计算了中度至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)的量(每天分钟数)、久坐时间、轻度、中度和剧烈身体活动,以及单次MVPA和久坐时间(0至5分钟、5至10分钟、10至20分钟和>20分钟)。
对于所有结局,15秒和60秒采样时长之间的差异具有统计学意义;然而,在30%的比较中,效应量较小或可忽略不计。偏差范围从1.9分钟/天(总MVPA)到102.7分钟/天(0至5分钟久坐时段)。基于回归的偏差估计和95%一致性界限表明,采样时长之间差异的大小,在某些情况下还有方向,会随活动水平而变化。15秒(r = -0.19至0.20)和60秒(r = -0.16至0.29)采样时长与体重指数和心血管健康的相关性相似。估计的15秒数据(由60秒数据预测)与测量数据相似,并且与健康结局具有相似的关系。
采样时长会影响PA和久坐模式的测量,且该效应会因活动水平而改变。然而,与健康结局的关联相似,采样时长差异可以调整。未来的研究应阐明不同采样时长测量单次活动的准确性,并评估采样时长是否会改变与其他健康结局的关系。