Haddadj Rayane, Verdot Charlotte, Salanave Benoît, Deschamps Valérie, Vanhelst Jérémy
Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Nutritional Epidemiology Surveillance Team, Santé Publique France, Bobigny, France.
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 31;19(12):e0316176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316176. eCollection 2024.
To process wearables sensors data, end-users face a wide variety of choices influencing physical activity (PA) patterns estimation. This study investigated the impact of varying epoch length on PA patterns in adults and World Health Organization (WHO) PA guidelines prevalence, assessed by accelerometer.
The study included 181 adults (18-74 years) from the Esteban Study (2014-2016). Participants wore an accelerometer for 7 consecutive days. Data were processed with ActiLife® software using epoch lengths from 1 to 60 seconds to assess PA patterns. Difference of PA patterns between epoch length was assessed using repeated measures ANOVA. Difference in meeting WHO PA guidelines was assesses using Fisher's exact test.
Significant changes were observed in sedentary behaviour and PA intensities with epoch length variation (p<0.001). Longer epochs led to reduced moderate and vigorous PA, increased light PA, and less sedentary time, affecting adherence to WHO PA guidelines.
Result underline the importance of careful epoch length selection when processing accelerometer data to accurately assess sedentary behaviour and PA in adults. Shorter epochs seem preferable to capture short and spontaneous PA bouts and preventing underestimation of MVPA along with prolonged PA bouts. Further investigation including a PA reference measure is needed to confirm these findings and their implications for adult health.
为了处理可穿戴传感器数据,终端用户面临着各种各样影响身体活动(PA)模式估计的选择。本研究调查了不同时间窗长度对成年人PA模式以及通过加速度计评估的世界卫生组织(WHO)PA指南患病率的影响。
该研究纳入了来自埃斯特万研究(2014 - 2016年)的181名成年人(18 - 74岁)。参与者连续7天佩戴加速度计。使用ActiLife®软件以1至60秒的时间窗长度处理数据,以评估PA模式。使用重复测量方差分析评估不同时间窗长度之间PA模式的差异。使用Fisher精确检验评估符合WHO PA指南的差异。
随着时间窗长度的变化,久坐行为和PA强度出现了显著变化(p<0.001)。较长的时间窗导致中度和剧烈PA减少,轻度PA增加,久坐时间减少,影响了对WHO PA指南的遵守情况。
结果强调了在处理加速度计数据以准确评估成年人的久坐行为和PA时,仔细选择时间窗长度的重要性。较短的时间窗似乎更适合捕捉短暂和自发的PA发作,并防止低估中等至剧烈PA以及长时间的PA发作。需要进一步的研究,包括PA参考测量,以证实这些发现及其对成人健康的影响。