Narayanasamy Sumithira, Vincent Stephen J, Sampson Geoff P, Wood Joanne M
School of Optometry and Vision Science, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Programme of Optometry & Vision Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Clin Exp Optom. 2016 May;99(3):233-40. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12365. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
The visual demands of modern classrooms are poorly understood yet are relevant in determining the levels of visual function required to perform optimally within this environment.
Thirty-three Year 5 and 6 classrooms from eight south-east Queensland schools were included. Classroom activities undertaken during a full school day (9 am to 3 pm) were observed and a range of measurements recorded, including classroom environment (physical dimensions, illumination levels), text size and contrast of learning materials, habitual working distances (distance and estimated for near) and time spent performing various classroom tasks. These measures were used to calculate demand-related minimum criteria for distance and near visual acuity, contrast and sustained use of accommodation and vergence.
The visual acuity demands for distance and near were 0.33 ± 0.13 and 0.72 ± 0.09 logMAR, respectively (using habitual viewing distances and smallest target sizes) or 0.33 ± 0.09 logMAR assuming a 2.5 times acuity reserve for sustained near tasks. The mean contrast levels of learning materials at distance and near were greater than 70 per cent. Near tasks (47 per cent) dominated the academic tasks performed in the classroom followed by distance (29 per cent), distance to near (15 per cent) and computer-based (nine per cent). On average, children engaged in continuous near fixation for 23 ± 5 minutes at a time and during distance-near tasks performed fixation changes 10 ± 1 times per minute. The mean estimated habitual near working distance was 23 ± 1 cm (4.38 ± 0.24 D accommodative demand) and the vergence demand was 0.86 ± 0.07(Δ) at distance and 21.94 ± 1.09(Δ) at near assuming an average pupillary distance of 56 mm.
Relatively high levels of visual acuity, contrast demand and sustained accommodative-convergence responses are required to meet the requirements of modern classroom environments. These findings provide an evidence base to inform prescribing guidelines and develop paediatric vision screening protocols and referral criteria.
现代教室对视力的要求尚未得到充分了解,但在确定在这种环境中最佳表现所需的视觉功能水平方面具有相关性。
纳入了昆士兰州东南部八所学校的33间五年级和六年级教室。观察了一整天(上午9点至下午3点)在教室中进行的活动,并记录了一系列测量数据,包括教室环境(物理尺寸、照明水平)、学习材料的文本大小和对比度、习惯工作距离(远距离和近距离估计值)以及执行各种课堂任务所花费的时间。这些测量数据用于计算与需求相关的远距离和近距离视力、对比度以及调节和聚散持续使用的最低标准。
远距离和近距离的视力需求分别为0.33±0.13和0.72±0.09 logMAR(使用习惯观看距离和最小目标尺寸),或者假设持续近距离任务有2.5倍的视力储备,则为0.33±0.09 logMAR。远距离和近距离学习材料的平均对比度水平均大于70%。近距离任务(47%)在课堂上执行的学术任务中占主导地位,其次是远距离任务(29%)、远近交替任务(15%)和基于计算机的任务(9%)。平均而言,儿童一次连续近距离注视23±5分钟,在远近交替任务中每分钟进行10±1次注视变化。假设平均瞳孔距离为56毫米,平均估计的习惯近距离工作距离为23±1厘米(调节需求为4.38±0.24 D),远距离的聚散需求为0.86±0.07(Δ),近距离为21.94±1.09(Δ)。
需要相对较高水平的视力、对比度要求以及持续的调节 - 聚散反应来满足现代教室环境的要求。这些发现为制定处方指南、制定儿童视力筛查方案和转诊标准提供了证据基础。