Haubenreisser Holger, Henzler Thomas, Budjan Johannes, Sudarski Sonja, Zenge Michael O, Schmidt Michaela, Nadar Mariappan S, Borggrefe Martin, Schoenberg Stefan O, Papavassiliu Theano
From the *Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University; †DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research) Partner Site, Mannheim; ‡MR Product Innovation and Definition, Healthcare Sector, Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany; §Imaging and Computer Vision, Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, Princeton, NJ; and ∥First Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Invest Radiol. 2016 Jun;51(6):379-86. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000250.
The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate a 2-dimensional real-time CINE TrueFISP magnetic resonance sequence using sparse data sampling with iterative reconstruction (SSIR) for right ventricular (RV) volumetry in comparison to the criterion standard (CS) acquired at 3 T.
Ten healthy controls and 20 consecutive patients scheduled for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging on a 3-T system (Magnetom Skyra; Siemens Healthcare Sector, Germany) underwent undersampled SSIR sequences with a single breath-hold (BH) as well as with shallow free breathing (NBH) and a fully sampled multi-BH sequence as CS. Right ventricular volumetry was performed with dedicated cardiac magnetic resonance software (cvi42; Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc, Calgary, Alberta, Canada). Agreement of SSIR with and without BH and CS for RV functional parameters (end-systolic volume [RVESV], end-diastolic volume [RVEDV], stroke volume [RVSV], and ejection fraction [RVEF]) were assessed with Bland-Altman analysis and paired t test.
Analysis of the 30 individuals (19 male; 48 ± 14 years) revealed no significant differences when comparing CS and BH measurements for RVEDV (153.7 vs 153.6 mL, P = 0.96), RVESV (71.6 vs 72.1 mL, P = 0.78), RVSV (82.0 vs 81.6 mL, P = 0.65), and RVEF (54.9% vs 54.2%, P = 0.19). Similar results were shown when comparing CS and NBH measurements for RVEDV (153.7 vs 152.2 mL, P = 0.34), RVESV (71.6 vs 72.8 mL, P = 0.30), RVSV (82.0 vs 81.0 mL, P = 0.46), and RVEF (54.9 vs 54.4, P = 0.48). Time taken for acquisition was 350 seconds for the CS, 34 seconds for BH, and 25 seconds for NBH measurements. Additional time required for iterative reconstruction was 2 minutes and 30 seconds for the sparse sampled data sets.
Our results demonstrate that accurate RV volumetry with SSIR data at 3 T is feasible in clinical routine within 25 seconds even without BH, which is of particular importance in patients with dyspnea.
本研究旨在前瞻性评估二维实时电影TrueFISP磁共振序列,该序列采用稀疏数据采样和迭代重建(SSIR)技术进行右心室(RV)容积测量,并与在3T场强下获取的标准参考值(CS)进行比较。
10名健康对照者和20名计划在3T系统(Magnetom Skyra;德国西门子医疗集团)上进行心脏磁共振成像的连续患者,接受了单次屏气(BH)和浅呼吸(非屏气,NBH)的欠采样SSIR序列,以及作为标准参考值的全采样多屏气序列。使用专用的心脏磁共振软件(cvi42;加拿大阿尔伯塔省卡尔加里市Circle心血管成像公司)进行右心室容积测量。采用Bland-Altman分析和配对t检验评估有屏气和无屏气的SSIR与标准参考值在右心室功能参数(收缩末期容积[RVESV]、舒张末期容积[RVEDV]、每搏输出量[RVSV]和射血分数[RVEF])方面的一致性。
对30名个体(19名男性;48±14岁)的分析显示,比较标准参考值和屏气测量的右心室舒张末期容积(153.7 vs 153.6 mL,P = 0.96)、收缩末期容积(71.6 vs 72.1 mL,P = 0.78)、每搏输出量(82.0 vs 81.6 mL,P = 0.65)和射血分数(54.9% vs 54.2%,P = 0.19)时,无显著差异。比较标准参考值和非屏气测量的右心室舒张末期容积(153.7 vs 152.2 mL,P = 0.34)、收缩末期容积(71.6 vs 72.