• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术后切口疝:发生率及预测因素

Incisional hernia after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: incidence and predictive factors.

作者信息

Julliard O, Hauters P, Possoz J, Malvaux P, Landenne J, Gherardi D

机构信息

Department of Surgery, CH Wapi, 9 Avenue Delmée, 7500, Tournai, Belgium.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4539-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4790-4. Epub 2016 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-016-4790-4
PMID:26895902
Abstract

AIM

To access the incidence and predictive factors of incisional hernia after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC).

METHODS

Eighty-two consecutive patients operated on for uncomplicated cholelithiasis between 2009 and 2013 were eligible for the study. Clinical outcome was assessed by a combination of case notes review, office consultation and telephone interview. Long-term incisional hernia rate was the major outcome of the study. Secondary outcome was the evaluation of predictive factors. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed using the following variables: age, gender, ASA score, BMI, risk, or comorbidity factors and surgical site infection.

RESULTS

Six patients (7 %) were lost to follow-up after the 1-month office visit and excluded. The study group consisted of 16 men and 60 women with a median age of 42 years (range 18-69) and a BMI of 25 (range 19-34). Eight patients had risk or comorbidity factors, 46 were classified ASA I, and 30 ASA II. Early postoperative course was uneventful in all cases but two patients developed a superficial wound abscess after hospital discharge. With a median follow-up of 44 months (range 12-72), incisional hernia was noted in six patients (7.9 %). Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that age (OR 1.08, 95 % CI 1.00-1.16, p < 0.038) and BMI (OR 1.37, 95 % CI 1.03-1.82, p < 0.029) were independent predictive factors of developing an incisional hernia. The incidence of hernia was, respectively, 15 % in patients with an age ≥ 50 and 33 % in patients with a BMI ≥ 30.

CONCLUSION

After SILC, we noted an incisional hernia rate of 8 %. To decrease the risk of developing that specific complication, SILC should only be proposed to young and non-obese patients.

摘要

目的

评估单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)后切口疝的发生率及预测因素。

方法

2009年至2013年间连续82例因单纯性胆石症接受手术的患者符合本研究条件。通过病例记录回顾、门诊咨询和电话访谈相结合的方式评估临床结局。长期切口疝发生率是本研究的主要结局。次要结局是对预测因素的评估。使用以下变量进行单因素和多因素统计分析:年龄、性别、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分、体重指数(BMI)、风险或合并症因素以及手术部位感染。

结果

6例患者(7%)在1个月门诊随访后失访并被排除。研究组包括16名男性和60名女性,中位年龄42岁(范围18 - 69岁),BMI为25(范围19 - 34)。8例患者有风险或合并症因素,46例ASA分级为I级,30例为ASA II级。除2例患者出院后出现浅表伤口脓肿外,所有患者术后早期过程均顺利。中位随访44个月(范围12 - 72个月),6例患者(7.9%)出现切口疝。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,年龄(比值比[OR]1.08,95%可信区间[CI]1.00 - 1.16,p < 0.038)和BMI(OR 1.37,95%CI 1.03 - 1.82,p < 0.029)是发生切口疝的独立预测因素。年龄≥50岁患者的疝发生率为15%,BMI≥30的患者为33%。

结论

SILC术后,我们注意到切口疝发生率为8%。为降低发生该特定并发症的风险,SILC应仅推荐给年轻且非肥胖患者。

相似文献

1
Incisional hernia after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: incidence and predictive factors.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术后切口疝:发生率及预测因素
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4539-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4790-4. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
2
Long-term incisional hernia rate after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is significantly higher than that after standard three-port laparoscopy: a cohort study.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的长期切口疝发生率明显高于标准三孔腹腔镜:一项队列研究。
Hernia. 2019 Dec;23(6):1205-1213. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01969-x. Epub 2019 May 9.
3
Long-term follow-up after single-incision laparoscopic surgery.单孔腹腔镜手术后的长期随访。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):126-132. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06739-5. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
4
Incidence and Risk Factors of Incisional Hernia After Single-Incision Endoscopic Surgery.单孔腹腔镜手术切口疝的发生率及危险因素
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Mar;30(3):251-255. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0728. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
5
Safety and Efficiency of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Obese Patients: A Case-Matched Comparative Analysis.肥胖患者单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性和有效性:病例匹配对比分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Aug;29(8):1005-1010. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0728. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
6
Influencing factors for port-site hernias after single-incision laparoscopy.单孔腹腔镜术后切口疝的影响因素
Hernia. 2016 Oct;20(5):729-33. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1512-8. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
7
Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)-a matched pair analysis.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)与腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的配对分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Aug;396(6):819-24. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0817-4. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
8
No difference in incidence of port-site hernia and chronic pain after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a nationwide prospective, matched cohort study.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术相比,端口部位疝和慢性疼痛发生率无差异:一项全国性前瞻性配对队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Nov;29(11):3239-45. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4066-4. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
9
COMPARISON BETWEEN INCIDENCE OF INCISIONAL HERNIA IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND BY SINGLE PORT.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术切口疝发生率的比较
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2018 Jun 21;31(1):e1354. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020180001e1354.
10
Single-port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology: seven years of experience at a single institution.妇科肿瘤学中的单孔腹腔镜手术:单一机构的七年经验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;217(5):610.e1-610.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
A retrospective study to investigate the effect of pressurized incision dressing on the occurrence of incisional infection after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.一项回顾性研究,旨在探讨加压切口敷料对腹腔镜胆囊切除术后切口感染发生率的影响。
Surg Pract Sci. 2025 Jul 23;22:100297. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2025.100297. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Research progress in the treatment of gallstones with laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery: a narrative review.腹腔镜与内镜手术治疗胆结石的研究进展:一项叙述性综述
BMC Surg. 2025 May 29;25(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02977-8.
3
Global pattern, trend and cross-country inequalities of inguinal, femoral, and abdominal hernia among individuals aged 60 and above from 1990 to 2021 and projections until 2040: a population-based study.

本文引用的文献

1
Follow-up after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, can it be done by phone? A prospective study in 300 patients, the PINQ-PHONE.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后的随访可以通过电话进行吗?一项针对300例患者的前瞻性研究,即PINQ-PHONE研究。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Nov;29(11):3292-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4080-6. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
2
No difference in incidence of port-site hernia and chronic pain after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a nationwide prospective, matched cohort study.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术相比,端口部位疝和慢性疼痛发生率无差异:一项全国性前瞻性配对队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Nov;29(11):3239-45. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4066-4. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
3
1990年至2021年60岁及以上人群腹股沟疝、股疝和腹疝的全球模式、趋势及国家间不平等状况以及至2040年的预测:一项基于人群的研究
Surg Endosc. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11810-5.
4
Exploration of umbilical hernia incidence and etiology in 753 cases of single-incision laparoscopic surgery: a retrospective analysis.753例单孔腹腔镜手术脐疝发生率及病因探讨:一项回顾性分析
BMC Surg. 2025 May 22;25(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02958-x.
5
The impact of comorbidities and surgical approach in incisional hernia development after minimally invasive cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of multivariate regression-adjusted studies.合并症及手术方式对微创胆囊切除术后切口疝发生的影响:多因素回归调整研究的系统评价与Meta分析
Hernia. 2025 Apr 23;29(1):148. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03340-9.
6
Evolution of minimally invasive cholecystectomy: a narrative review.微创胆囊切除术的发展:叙述性综述。
BMC Surg. 2024 Nov 29;24(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02659-x.
7
Incisional hernia after minimally invasive gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients.胃癌患者微创胃切除术后的切口疝
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2021 Jun 15;24(2):84-90. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2021.24.2.84.
8
Risk factors of incisional hernia after single-incision cholecystectomy and safety of barbed suture material for wound closure.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术后切口疝的危险因素及倒刺缝线材料用于伤口闭合的安全性
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2021 Sep 15;24(3):145-151. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2021.24.3.145.
9
Incidence and risk factors for umbilical incisional hernia after reduced port colorectal surgery (SIL + 1 additional port)-is an umbilical midline approach really a problem?经减少端口结直肠手术后脐部切口疝的发生率和危险因素(SIL+1 个附加端口)-脐中线入路真的是一个问题吗?
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 May;407(3):1241-1249. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02416-1. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
10
Laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for single-incision cholecystectomy: an updated systematic review.腹腔镜手术和机器人手术用于单孔胆囊切除术:一项更新的系统评价。
Updates Surg. 2021 Dec;73(6):2039-2046. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01056-w. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
Incisional hernia after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Is there any factor associated?
腹腔镜结直肠手术后的切口疝。是否存在相关因素?
Surg Endosc. 2014 Dec;28(12):3421-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3615-6. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
4
Comparison between single incision and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated cholelithiasis.单纯性胆结石的单孔与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较。
Acta Chir Belg. 2013 Nov-Dec;113(6):391-6.
5
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术在美容评分方面具有优势,但疝的发生率显著升高:传统多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术前瞻性随机、多中心、单盲临床试验的 1 年结果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Jun;216(6):1037-47; discussion 1047-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.024. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
6
Wound complications in 1145 consecutive transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic procedures.1145 例连续经脐单切口腹腔镜手术的伤口并发症。
Ann Surg. 2014 Jan;259(1):89-95. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827b7818.
7
Is single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe? Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术安全吗?系统评价和荟萃分析的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jul;27(7):2293-304. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2763-9. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
8
Comparison between single-incision and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective trial of the Club Coelio.单孔与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较:腔镜俱乐部的前瞻性试验。
Surg Endosc. 2013 May;27(5):1689-94. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2657-x. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
9
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.系统评价和随机临床试验的荟萃分析比较单切口与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
Br J Surg. 2013 Jan;100(2):191-208. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8937. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
10
Single umbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of the prospective trial of the Coelio Club.单脐孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:腹腔镜俱乐部前瞻性试验的结果。
J Visc Surg. 2012 Dec;149(6):417-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2012.10.017. Epub 2012 Nov 13.