Voth Caitlyn, Kapani Nisha, Silveira Carlos Balthazar da, Cogua Laura, Salevitz Nicole, Deka Vikram, Gillespie Thomas, Ballecer Conrad
Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Dignity Health Saint Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Hernia. 2025 Apr 23;29(1):148. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03340-9.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a widely preferred method for gallbladder removal due to its minimally invasive benefits, including reduced postoperative pain and quicker recovery. However, the risk of incisional hernia remains a significant concern. Understanding the role of comorbidities in influencing this risk is crucial for improving patient management and surgical planning. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to identify and evaluate the impact of comorbidities on the risk of incisional hernia following minimally invasive laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception until August 2024. We included studies that investigated risk factors for incisional hernia in minimally invasive cholecystectomy. A subgroup analysis was performed to compare hernia rates between single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MPLC). Comorbidities analyzed were age, diabetes mellitus (DM), BMI > 30 kg/m, female gender, and history of umbilical hernia repair for single-port cholecystectomy studies. We also analyzed perioperative factors: acute versus chronic cholecystitis, incision enlargement, and SSI. Statistical analyses were conducted using the meta package in R Studio.
551 articles were screened by title and abstract, from which 19 were selected for full-text review. A total of 9 studies were included, comprising 7,052 patients. The proportional meta-analysis found an IH rate of 3.82%; 95%CI [0.98; 8.27]; I = 97%). We found that older age (MD 9.6 years; 95% CI [6.9; 12.3]; P < 0.001), DM (RR 2.15; 95%CI [1.1; 4.2]; p = 0.02), and a BMI higher than 30 kg/m (RR 2.65; 95% CI [2.1; 3.3]; p < 0.01) were associated with postoperative IH development. We found no association between sex (RR 1.09; 95% CI [0.95; 1.26]; P = 0.68) and IH development. SSI was identified as a risk factor for IH (RR 5.3; 95%CI 3-9.1; p < 0.01), but no association was found for incision enlargement (OR 3.7; 95%CI 0.3-51.8; p = 0.33) and acute cholecystitis (RR 2.6; 95%CI 0.95-7.1; p = 0.06). Also, for studies performing SILC, previous umbilical hernia repair was not associated with increased IH rates (RR 2.12; 95% CI [0.86; 5.22]; p = 0.1). No subgroup differences were found between SILC (2.96%; 95%CI [0.47; 7.14]) and MPLC (4.4%; 95% CI [0.21; 13.2]; p = 0.73).
Our meta-analysis revealed that older age, BMI > 30 kg/m2, DM, ASA score > 2 and SSI are risk factors linked to IH following MIS cholecystectomy.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术因其微创优势,包括术后疼痛减轻和恢复更快,是广泛首选的胆囊切除方法。然而,切口疝的风险仍然是一个重大问题。了解合并症在影响此风险中的作用对于改善患者管理和手术规划至关重要。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在确定和评估合并症对微创腹腔镜胆囊切除术后切口疝风险的影响。
我们对PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库从创建至2024年8月进行了全面检索。我们纳入了调查微创胆囊切除术中切口疝危险因素的研究。进行亚组分析以比较单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)和多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(MPLC)之间的疝发生率。分析的合并症包括年龄、糖尿病(DM)、BMI>30kg/m²、女性以及单孔胆囊切除术研究中的脐疝修补史。我们还分析了围手术期因素:急性胆囊炎与慢性胆囊炎、切口扩大和手术部位感染(SSI)。使用R Studio中的meta包进行统计分析。
通过标题和摘要筛选了551篇文章,从中选择19篇进行全文审查。共纳入9项研究,包括7052例患者。比例荟萃分析发现切口疝发生率为3.82%;95%CI[0.98;8.27];I²=97%)。我们发现年龄较大(MD 9.6岁;95%CI[6.9;12.3];P<0.001)、糖尿病(RR 2.15;95%CI[1.1;4.2];p=0.02)以及BMI高于30kg/m²(RR 2.65;95%CI[2.1;3.3];p<0.01)与术后切口疝的发生相关。我们发现性别(RR 1.09;95%CI[0.95;1.26];P=0.68)与切口疝的发生无关联。手术部位感染被确定为切口疝的一个危险因素(RR 5.3;95%CI 3 - 9.1;p<0.01),但未发现切口扩大(OR 3.7;95%CI 0.3 - 51.8;p=0.33)和急性胆囊炎(RR 2.6;95%CI 0.95 - 7.1;p=0.06)与之有关联。此外,对于进行单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的研究,既往脐疝修补与切口疝发生率增加无关(RR 2.12;95%CI[0.86;5.22];p=0.1)。在单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(2.96%;95%CI[0.47;7.14])和多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(4.4%;95%CI[0.21;13.2];p=0.73)之间未发现亚组差异。
我们的荟萃分析表明,年龄较大、BMI>30kg/m²、糖尿病、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分>2以及手术部位感染是与微创胆囊切除术后切口疝相关的危险因素。