Majumder Arnab, Gao Yue, Sadava Emanuel E, Anderson James M, Novitsky Yuri W
Department of Surgery, Case Comprehensive Hernia Center, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4445-53. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4764-6. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
While mesh reinforcement is recognized as the optimal strategy for many hernia repairs, there remains debate on the optimal position for deployment and characteristics that lead to improved biocompatibility. Coatings are an avenue by which integration may be improved. Our aim was to evaluate tissue integration between uncoated, fibroblast- and mesenchymal stem cell-coated meshes placed as subcutaneous onlay (ON) or intraperitoneal underlay (UN).
Three commonly used biologic and synthetic hernia meshes were tested including Parietex, TIGR and Strattice. Each mesh was coated with rat kidney fibroblasts (NRKs) or rat mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) along with an uncoated group. In the ON group, mesh was fixated on top of the external oblique fascia. In the UN group, mesh was placed against the intact peritoneum. Animals were survived for 30 days and killed for biomechanical and histologic analysis. A "T"-peel test was performed on a mesh-tissue explant from each sample to analyze the strength of integration at the mesh-tissue interface. Tissue integration was evaluated histologically using an established scoring system.
All uncoated meshes demonstrated significantly higher tissue ingrowth in the UN compared to ON position. Cell-coating of synthetic meshes decreased tissue ingrowth as UN, but increased it as ON, with a net effect of minimizing biomechanical difference between the two positions. In the biologic group however, NRK-coating decreased tissue ingrowth regardless of position, while MSC-coating increased it in both ON and UN positions.
Both cell-coating and positioning affect mesh-tissue integration. Integration is superior in the underlay position compared to onlay when uncoated. Cell-coating of selected synthetic meshes can improve integration, particularly in the onlay position. Furthermore, MSCs appear to be a viable choice for biologic mesh coating, especially when implanted as an onlay. Overall, cell-coating of surgical meshes appears to a have a potential to improve mesh-tissue integration.
虽然补片加强被认为是许多疝修补术的最佳策略,但对于补片放置的最佳位置以及能提高生物相容性的特性仍存在争议。涂层是一种可改善整合的途径。我们的目的是评估皮下植入(ON)或腹膜内植入(UN)的未涂层、成纤维细胞涂层和间充质干细胞涂层补片之间的组织整合情况。
测试了三种常用的生物和合成疝修补补片,包括 Parietex、TIGR 和 Strattice。每种补片均分为未涂层组、大鼠肾成纤维细胞(NRK)涂层组和大鼠间充质干细胞(MSC)涂层组。在 ON 组中,补片固定在腹外斜肌腱膜上方。在 UN 组中,补片放置在完整的腹膜上。动物存活 30 天,然后处死进行生物力学和组织学分析。对每个样本的补片 - 组织外植体进行“T”型剥离试验,以分析补片 - 组织界面处的整合强度。使用既定的评分系统对组织整合进行组织学评估。
与 ON 位置相比,所有未涂层补片在 UN 位置均显示出明显更高的组织长入。合成补片的细胞涂层使 UN 位置的组织长入减少,但使 ON 位置的组织长入增加,其净效应是最小化两个位置之间的生物力学差异。然而,在生物补片组中,无论位置如何,NRK 涂层均减少组织长入,而 MSC 涂层在 ON 和 UN 位置均增加组织长入。
细胞涂层和放置位置均会影响补片 - 组织整合。未涂层时,植入位置为植入在下时的整合优于植入在上时。特定合成补片的细胞涂层可改善整合,特别是在植入在上的位置。此外,间充质干细胞似乎是生物补片涂层的可行选择,尤其是当作为植入在上的补片植入时。总体而言,手术补片的细胞涂层似乎有可能改善补片 - 组织整合。