Chen Shih-Hao, Tai Ching-Lung, Yu Tzai-Chiu, Wang Chih-Wei, Lin Chia-Wei, Chen Chen-Yu, Liu Keng-Chang
Department of Orthopedics, Buddhist Tzu-Chi General Hospital at Taichung, Tzu-Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
Graduate Institute of Medical Mechatronics, Chang Gung University, 259, Wen-Hua 1st RD., Kweishan, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Oct;24(10):3262-3271. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4107-0. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
Distal femur fractures adjacent to total knee arthroplasty are a rare yet complex problem. Recently, extramedullary locking plate and retrograde intramedullary nail fixations have become popular options, but the complication rates associated with these procedures are 15-20 %. Modified fixations were assessed in an effort to reduce complications from unstable periprosthetic fractures.
Using experimental and finite element methods, this study compared the construct behaviours of a locking plate, a retrograde intramedullary nail, and their modifications (a spiral-blade supplemented in an intramedullary nail or a locking plate/allograft hybrid) when subjected to various fracture types, locations, loading conditions, and bony strength. The implanted models were used to assess construct stiffness, fracture micromotion, and implant stress under different osteoporotic conditions. Finally, we collected 40 cases for radiological analysis to indicate the appropriate procedure for treating periprosthetic fractures following total knee arthroplasty.
Regardless of the fracture type, femoral constructs fixed with a conventional or spiral-blade supplemented intramedullary nail exhibited higher axial but lower torsional stiffness than those fixed with a locking plate. Torsional deformation occurred if the lower-positioned fracture had no medial support. The locking plate/allograft construct exhibited the highest stiffness and the least micromotion. A review of 40 clinical cases confirmed the above findings regarding the locking plate/allograft construct.
The spiral-blade supplement of retrograde intramedullary nail and locking plate/allograft modified constructs significantly stabilizes the unstable fractured gaps. The locking plate/allograft is recommended for the periprosthetic fractures with deficient bone stock and severe osteoporosis to improve alignment and healing potentials.
全膝关节置换术附近的股骨远端骨折是一个罕见但复杂的问题。近来,髓外锁定钢板和逆行髓内钉固定术已成为常用的治疗方法,但这些手术的并发症发生率为15%-20%。为减少假体周围不稳定骨折的并发症,对改良固定方法进行了评估。
本研究采用实验和有限元方法,比较了锁定钢板、逆行髓内钉及其改良方法(髓内钉辅以螺旋刀片或锁定钢板/同种异体骨混合)在不同骨折类型、位置、负荷条件和骨强度下的结构性能。植入模型用于评估不同骨质疏松条件下的结构刚度、骨折微动和植入物应力。最后,我们收集了40例病例进行影像学分析,以确定全膝关节置换术后假体周围骨折的合适治疗方法。
无论骨折类型如何,与锁定钢板固定的股骨结构相比,采用传统或螺旋刀片辅助髓内钉固定的股骨结构轴向刚度较高,但扭转刚度较低。如果低位骨折没有内侧支撑,则会发生扭转变形。锁定钢板/同种异体骨结构刚度最高,微动最小。对40例临床病例的回顾证实了上述关于锁定钢板/同种异体骨结构的发现。
逆行髓内钉辅以螺旋刀片以及锁定钢板/同种异体骨改良结构能显著稳定不稳定骨折间隙。对于骨量不足和严重骨质疏松的假体周围骨折,推荐使用锁定钢板/同种异体骨,以改善对线和愈合潜力。