Marcus Julia L, Volk Jonathan E, Pinder Jess, Liu Albert Y, Bacon Oliver, Hare C Bradley, Cohen Stephanie E
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, 2nd Floor, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA.
Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco Medical Center, 2238 Geary Boulevard, San Francisco, CA, 94115, USA.
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2016 Apr;13(2):116-24. doi: 10.1007/s11904-016-0308-x.
The past 3 years have marked a transition from research establishing the safety and efficacy of HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to questions about how to optimize its implementation. Until recently, PrEP was primarily offered as part of randomized controlled trials or open-label studies. These studies highlighted the key components of PrEP delivery, including regular testing for HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs), adherence and risk-reduction support, and monitoring for renal toxicity. PrEP is now increasingly provided in routine clinical settings. This review summarizes models for PrEP implementation from screening through initiation and follow-up, focusing on the strengths and weaknesses of three delivery systems: a health maintenance organization, an STI clinic, and a primary care practice. These early implementation experiences demonstrate that PrEP can be successfully delivered across a variety of settings and highlight strategies to streamline PrEP delivery in clinical practice.
过去三年标志着从确立HIV暴露前预防(PrEP)安全性和有效性的研究向如何优化其实施的问题的转变。直到最近,PrEP主要作为随机对照试验或开放标签研究的一部分提供。这些研究强调了PrEP实施的关键组成部分,包括定期检测HIV和其他性传播感染(STIs)、依从性和降低风险支持以及监测肾毒性。现在,PrEP在常规临床环境中越来越多地被提供。本综述总结了从筛查到启动及随访的PrEP实施模式,重点关注三种提供系统的优缺点:健康维护组织、性传播感染诊所和初级保健机构。这些早期实施经验表明,PrEP可以在各种环境中成功提供,并突出了在临床实践中简化PrEP提供的策略。