• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基因组咨询对寻求个人基因组测序的表面健康个体的知情决策的影响:健康测序项目

Impact of Genomic Counseling on Informed Decision-Making among ostensibly Healthy Individuals Seeking Personal Genome Sequencing: the HealthSeq Project.

作者信息

Suckiel Sabrina A, Linderman Michael D, Sanderson Saskia C, Diaz George A, Wasserstein Melissa, Kasarskis Andrew, Schadt Eric E, Zinberg Randi E

机构信息

Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1498, New York, NY, USA.

Icahn Institute of Genomics and Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2016 Oct;25(5):1044-53. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-9935-z. Epub 2016 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1007/s10897-016-9935-z
PMID:26898680
Abstract

Personal genome sequencing is increasingly utilized by healthy individuals for predispositional screening and other applications. However, little is known about the impact of 'genomic counseling' on informed decision-making in this context. Our primary aim was to compare measures of participants' informed decision-making before and after genomic counseling in the HealthSeq project, a longitudinal cohort study of individuals receiving personal results from whole genome sequencing (WGS). Our secondary aims were to assess the impact of the counseling on WGS knowledge and concerns, and to explore participants' satisfaction with the counseling. Questionnaires were administered to participants (n = 35) before and after their pre-test genomic counseling appointment. Informed decision-making was measured using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) and the Satisfaction with Decision Scale (SDS). DCS scores decreased after genomic counseling (mean: 11.34 before vs. 5.94 after; z = -4.34, p < 0.001, r = 0.52), and SDS scores increased (mean: 27.91 vs. 29.06 respectively; z = 2.91, p = 0.004, r = 0.35). Satisfaction with counseling was high (mean (SD) = 26.91 (2.68), on a scale where 6 = low and 30 = high satisfaction). HealthSeq participants felt that their decision regarding receiving personal results from WGS was more informed after genomic counseling. Further research comparing the impact of different genomic counseling models is needed.

摘要

健康个体越来越多地利用个人基因组测序进行易感性筛查和其他应用。然而,在这种情况下,关于“基因组咨询”对知情决策的影响却知之甚少。我们的主要目的是在HealthSeq项目中比较基因组咨询前后参与者知情决策的指标,该项目是一项对接受全基因组测序(WGS)个人结果的个体进行的纵向队列研究。我们的次要目的是评估咨询对WGS知识和担忧的影响,并探讨参与者对咨询的满意度。在参与者进行预测试基因组咨询预约之前和之后,对他们(n = 35)进行问卷调查。使用决策冲突量表(DCS)和决策满意度量表(SDS)来衡量知情决策。基因组咨询后,DCS得分降低(均值:之前为11.34,之后为5.94;z = -4.34,p < 0.001,r = 0.52),SDS得分升高(均值:分别为27.91和29.06;z = 2.91,p = 0.004,r = 0.35)。对咨询的满意度很高(均值(标准差)= 26.91(2.68),量表范围为6 = 低满意度,30 = 高满意度)。HealthSeq项目的参与者认为,在进行基因组咨询后,他们对于接受WGS个人结果的决定更加明智。需要进一步研究比较不同基因组咨询模式的影响。

相似文献

1
Impact of Genomic Counseling on Informed Decision-Making among ostensibly Healthy Individuals Seeking Personal Genome Sequencing: the HealthSeq Project.基因组咨询对寻求个人基因组测序的表面健康个体的知情决策的影响:健康测序项目
J Genet Couns. 2016 Oct;25(5):1044-53. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-9935-z. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
2
Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project.个人基因组测序研究参与者的动机、担忧与偏好:健康测序项目的基线研究结果
Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Jan;24(1):14-20. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.118. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
3
Psychological and behavioural impact of returning personal results from whole-genome sequencing: the HealthSeq project.全基因组测序返回个人结果的心理和行为影响:健康序列计划
Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Feb;25(3):280-292. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.178. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
4
Informed decision-making among students analyzing their personal genomes on a whole genome sequencing course: a longitudinal cohort study.在全基因组测序课程中分析个人基因组的学生中进行知情决策:一项纵向队列研究。
Genome Med. 2013 Dec 30;5(12):113. doi: 10.1186/gm518. eCollection 2013.
5
Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a randomized controlled trial.基于计算机的决策辅助工具对乳腺癌易感性基因检测的知识、认知及意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2004 Jul 28;292(4):442-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.4.442.
6
Web Platform vs In-Person Genetic Counselor for Return of Carrier Results From Exome Sequencing: A Randomized Clinical Trial.网页平台与现场遗传咨询师在传递外显子组测序携带者结果方面的比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Mar 1;178(3):338-346. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8049.
7
"Is It Worth Knowing?" Focus Group Participants' Perceived Utility of Genomic Preconception Carrier Screening.“了解它是否值得?”焦点小组参与者对基因组孕前携带者筛查的感知效用
J Genet Couns. 2016 Feb;25(1):135-45. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9851-7. Epub 2015 Jun 21.
8
Should pretest genetic counselling be required for patients pursuing genomic sequencing? Results from a survey of participants in a large genomic implementation study.患者在进行基因组测序前是否应进行预试验遗传咨询?一项大型基因组实施研究参与者调查的结果。
J Med Genet. 2019 May;56(5):317-324. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105577. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
9
Clients' Perception of Outcome of Team-Based Prenatal and Reproductive Genetic Counseling in Serbian Service Using the Perceived Personal Control (PPC) Questionnaire.使用感知个人控制(PPC)问卷对塞尔维亚服务中基于团队的产前和生殖遗传咨询结果的客户认知。
J Genet Couns. 2016 Feb;25(1):189-97. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9857-1. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
10
Predispositional genome sequencing in healthy adults: design, participant characteristics, and early outcomes of the PeopleSeq Consortium.健康成年人的倾向性全基因组测序:PeopleSeq 联盟的设计、参与者特征和早期结果。
Genome Med. 2019 Feb 27;11(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13073-019-0619-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Parents' perspectives on expanded newborn genomic screening in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.阿拉伯联合酋长国阿布扎比父母对扩大新生儿基因组筛查的看法。
Hum Genomics. 2025 Jun 6;19(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s40246-025-00766-1.
2
Primary Care Implementation of Genomic Population Health Screening Using a Large Gene Sequencing Panel.使用大型基因测序面板在初级保健中实施基因组人群健康筛查
Front Genet. 2022 Apr 25;13:867334. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.867334. eCollection 2022.
3
Return of individual research results: What do participants prefer and expect?

本文引用的文献

1
Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project.个人基因组测序研究参与者的动机、担忧与偏好:健康测序项目的基线研究结果
Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Jan;24(1):153. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.179. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
2
Development and preliminary evaluation of an online educational video about whole-genome sequencing for research participants, patients, and the general public.为研究参与者、患者和普通公众制作的关于全基因组测序的在线教育视频的开发与初步评估。
Genet Med. 2016 May;18(5):501-12. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.118. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
3
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values.
个体研究结果的返还:参与者更喜欢和期望什么?
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 29;16(7):e0254153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254153. eCollection 2021.
4
Development and Validation of a Comprehensive Genomics Knowledge Scale.全面基因组学知识量表的编制与验证。
Public Health Genomics. 2021;24(5-6):291-303. doi: 10.1159/000515006. Epub 2021 May 31.
5
"Is that something that should concern me?": a qualitative exploration of parent understanding of their child's genomic test results.“这是我该担心的事吗?”:对父母对其孩子基因组检测结果理解情况的质性探索
HGG Adv. 2021 Apr 8;2(2). doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2021.100027. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
6
DNA-based screening and personal health: a points to consider statement for individuals and health-care providers from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).基于DNA的筛查与个人健康:美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会(ACMG)为个人和医疗服务提供者提供的一份需考虑要点声明
Genet Med. 2021 Jun;23(6):979-988. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-01083-9. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
7
Roles of attitudes and injunctive norms in decisional conflict and disclosure following receipt of genome sequencing results.在接受基因组测序结果后,态度和规范指令在决策冲突和披露中的作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Oct;262:113147. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113147. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
8
Should pretest genetic counselling be required for patients pursuing genomic sequencing? Results from a survey of participants in a large genomic implementation study.患者在进行基因组测序前是否应进行预试验遗传咨询?一项大型基因组实施研究参与者调查的结果。
J Med Genet. 2019 May;56(5):317-324. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105577. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
9
Impacts of incorporating personal genome sequencing into graduate genomics education: a longitudinal study over three course years.将个人基因组测序纳入研究生基因组学教育的影响:一项为期三个学年的纵向研究。
BMC Med Genomics. 2018 Jan 30;11(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12920-018-0319-0.
10
Psychological and behavioural impact of returning personal results from whole-genome sequencing: the HealthSeq project.全基因组测序返回个人结果的心理和行为影响:健康序列计划
Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Feb;25(3):280-292. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.178. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
对错误发现率和p值误读的调查。
R Soc Open Sci. 2014 Nov 19;1(3):140216. doi: 10.1098/rsos.140216. eCollection 2014 Nov.
4
The MedSeq Project: a randomized trial of integrating whole genome sequencing into clinical medicine.MedSeq 项目:将全基因组测序整合到临床医学中的一项随机试验。
Trials. 2014 Mar 20;15:85. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-85.
5
Teaching genomic counseling: preparing the genetic counseling workforce for the genomic era.基因组咨询教学:为基因组时代培养遗传咨询人才队伍。
J Genet Couns. 2014 Aug;23(4):445-51. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9689-4. Epub 2014 Feb 8.
6
From genetic counseling to "genomic counseling".从遗传咨询到“基因组咨询”。
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2013 Nov;1(4):189-93. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.45.
7
Adapting genetic counseling training to the genomic era: more an evolution than a revolution.使遗传咨询培训适应基因组时代:更多的是一种演变而非革命。
J Genet Couns. 2014 Aug;23(4):452-4. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9690-y. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
8
Personalized genomic disease risk of volunteers.志愿者的个性化基因组疾病风险。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 15;110(42):16957-62. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1315934110. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
9
Genomic counseling: next generation counseling.基因组咨询:下一代咨询。
J Genet Couns. 2014 Aug;23(4):689-92. doi: 10.1007/s10897-013-9641-z. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
10
Willingness to participate in genomics research and desire for personal results among underrepresented minority patients: a structured interview study.代表性不足的少数族裔患者参与基因组学研究的意愿及对个人结果的期望:一项结构化访谈研究
J Community Genet. 2013 Oct;4(4):469-82. doi: 10.1007/s12687-013-0154-0. Epub 2013 Jun 22.