• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全面基因组学知识量表的编制与验证。

Development and Validation of a Comprehensive Genomics Knowledge Scale.

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont, USA.

The Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Genomics. 2021;24(5-6):291-303. doi: 10.1159/000515006. Epub 2021 May 31.

DOI:10.1159/000515006
PMID:34058740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8962920/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Genomic testing is increasingly employed in clinical, research, educational, and commercial contexts. Genomic literacy is a prerequisite for the effective application of genomic testing, creating a corresponding need for validated tools to assess genomics knowledge. We sought to develop a reliable measure of genomics knowledge that incorporates modern genomic technologies and is informative for individuals with diverse backgrounds, including those with clinical/life sciences training.

METHODS

We developed the GKnowM Genomics Knowledge Scale to assess the knowledge needed to make an informed decision for genomic testing, appropriately apply genomic technologies and participate in civic decision-making. We administered the 30-item draft measure to a calibration cohort (n = 1,234) and subsequent participants to create a combined validation cohort (n = 2,405). We performed a multistage psychometric calibration and validation using classical test theory and item response theory (IRT) and conducted a post-hoc simulation study to evaluate the suitability of a computerized adaptive testing (CAT) implementation.

RESULTS

Based on exploratory factor analysis, we removed 4 of the 30 draft items. The resulting 26-item GKnowM measure has a single dominant factor. The scale internal consistency is α = 0.85, and the IRT 3-PL model demonstrated good overall and item fit. Validity is demonstrated with significant correlation (r = 0.61) with an existing genomics knowledge measure and significantly higher scores for individuals with adequate health literacy and healthcare providers (HCPs), including HCPs who work with genomic testing. The item bank is well suited to CAT, achieving high accuracy (r = 0.97 with the full measure) while administering a mean of 13.5 items.

CONCLUSION

GKnowM is an updated, broadly relevant, rigorously validated 26-item measure for assessing genomics knowledge that we anticipate will be useful for assessing population genomic literacy and evaluating the effectiveness of genomics educational interventions.

摘要

背景

基因组测试越来越多地应用于临床、研究、教育和商业领域。基因组素养是有效应用基因组测试的前提,因此需要有经过验证的工具来评估基因组学知识。我们旨在开发一种可靠的衡量基因组知识的方法,该方法结合了现代基因组技术,并且对具有不同背景的个体(包括具有临床/生命科学培训背景的个体)具有信息性。

方法

我们开发了 GKnowM 基因组知识量表,以评估做出明智的基因组测试决策、适当地应用基因组技术和参与公民决策所需的知识。我们向校准队列(n=1234)和随后的参与者管理了 30 项草案措施,以创建一个综合验证队列(n=2405)。我们使用经典测试理论和项目反应理论(IRT)进行了多阶段心理测量校准和验证,并进行了事后模拟研究,以评估计算机自适应测试(CAT)实施的适用性。

结果

基于探索性因素分析,我们从 30 项草案中删除了 4 项。由此产生的 26 项 GKnowM 措施具有单一的主导因素。该量表的内部一致性为α=0.85,IRT 3-PL 模型表现出良好的整体和项目拟合。有效性通过与现有基因组知识量表的显著相关性(r=0.61)和具有足够健康素养和医疗保健提供者(HCPs)的个体(包括与基因组测试合作的 HCPs)的显著较高分数得到证明。项目库非常适合 CAT,在管理平均 13.5 个项目的同时实现了高准确性(r=0.97 与完整量表)。

结论

GKnowM 是一种经过更新、广泛相关、经过严格验证的 26 项基因组知识衡量标准,我们预计它将有助于评估人口基因组素养和评估基因组教育干预措施的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5ca/8962920/82b1fc951754/nihms-1676681-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5ca/8962920/de4db99069f9/nihms-1676681-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5ca/8962920/82b1fc951754/nihms-1676681-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5ca/8962920/de4db99069f9/nihms-1676681-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5ca/8962920/82b1fc951754/nihms-1676681-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of a Comprehensive Genomics Knowledge Scale.全面基因组学知识量表的编制与验证。
Public Health Genomics. 2021;24(5-6):291-303. doi: 10.1159/000515006. Epub 2021 May 31.
2
Calibration and initial validation of a general self-efficacy item bank and short form for the NIH PROMIS.NIH PROMIS 一般自我效能感项目库和简式量表的校准和初步验证。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Sep;28(9):2513-2523. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02198-6. Epub 2019 May 28.
3
Psychometric Validation and Cultural Adaptation of the Simplified Chinese eHealth Literacy Scale: Cross-Sectional Study.《简化版电子健康素养量表的心理测量学验证和文化适应性:横断面研究》
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 7;22(12):e18613. doi: 10.2196/18613.
4
Measuring a Broad Spectrum of eHealth Skills in the Web 3.0 Context Using an eHealth Literacy Scale: Development and Validation Study.在 Web 3.0 背景下使用电子健康素养量表衡量广泛的电子健康技能:开发和验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 23;23(9):e31627. doi: 10.2196/31627.
5
Reliability, Validity, and Efficiency of an Item Response Theory-Based Balance Confidence Patient-Reported Outcome Measure.基于项目反应理论的平衡信心患者报告结局测量的信度、效度和效率
Phys Ther. 2023 Jul 1;103(7). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzad058.
6
A new comprehensive oral health literacy scale: development and psychometric evaluation.一种新的全面口腔健康素养量表:编制与心理测量学评估。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Sep 5;21(1):429. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01795-7.
7
Psychometric Assessment of an Item Bank for Adaptive Testing on Patient-Reported Experience of Care Environment for Severe Mental Illness: Validation Study.用于严重精神疾病患者报告的护理环境体验的自适应测试的项目库的心理计量学评估:验证研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 May 16;11:e49916. doi: 10.2196/49916.
8
Validity Testing and Cultural Adaptation of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) Among People With Chronic Diseases in Taiwan: Mixed Methods Study.电子健康素养问卷(eHLQ)在台湾慢性病患者中的有效性检验和文化调适:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 19;24(1):e32855. doi: 10.2196/32855.
9
A Psychometric Analysis of the Italian Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale Using Item Response and Classical Test Theory Methods.使用项目反应理论和经典测试理论方法对电子健康素养量表意大利语版本进行的心理测量分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 11;19(4):e114. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6749.
10
Validity Evidence of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) Part 2: Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluate Test Content, Response Process, and Internal Structure in the Australian Community Health Setting.电子健康素养问卷(eHLQ)第二部分的有效性证据:在澳大利亚社区卫生环境中评估测试内容、反应过程和内部结构的混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 8;24(3):e32777. doi: 10.2196/32777.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetic and Genomic Literacy of Healthcare Providers Treating Anorexia Nervosa in the United States: A Mixed Methods, Cross-Sectional Study.美国治疗神经性厌食症的医疗服务提供者的遗传和基因组知识素养:一项混合方法的横断面研究。
Brain Behav. 2025 Apr;15(4):e70441. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70441.
2
The BabySeq Project: A clinical trial of genome sequencing in a diverse cohort of infants.婴儿测序计划:对不同种族婴儿进行基因组测序的临床试验。
Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Oct 3;111(10):2094-2106. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.08.011. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
3
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act and workplace genetic testing: Knowledge and perceptions of employed adults in the United States.

本文引用的文献

1
Genomic education for the next generation of health-care providers.为下一代医疗保健提供者提供基因组教育。
Genet Med. 2019 Nov;21(11):2422-2430. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0548-4. Epub 2019 May 21.
2
Predispositional genome sequencing in healthy adults: design, participant characteristics, and early outcomes of the PeopleSeq Consortium.健康成年人的倾向性全基因组测序:PeopleSeq 联盟的设计、参与者特征和早期结果。
Genome Med. 2019 Feb 27;11(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13073-019-0619-9.
3
Development of the Knowledge of Genome Sequencing (KOGS) questionnaire.
《遗传信息非歧视法案》与职场基因检测:美国在职成年人的知识与认知
J Genet Couns. 2025 Apr;34(2):e1945. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1945. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
4
The biosafety incident response competence scale for clinical nursing staff: a development and validation study.临床护理人员生物安全事件应对能力量表的编制与验证研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Mar 14;23(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01848-6.
5
Variability in conceptualizations and measurement of genetic literacy.遗传素养概念化与测量的变异性。
PEC Innov. 2023 Mar 8;2:100147. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100147. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Understanding changes in genetic literacy over time and in genetic research participants.了解遗传素养随时间的变化以及遗传研究参与者的变化。
Am J Hum Genet. 2022 Dec 1;109(12):2141-2151. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.11.005. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
基因组测序知识(KOGS)问卷的编制。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Nov;101(11):1966-1972. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.07.011. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
4
Development and Validation of a Genomic Knowledge Scale to Advance Informed Decision Making Research in Genomic Sequencing.用于推进基因组测序中知情决策研究的基因组知识量表的开发与验证
MDM Policy Pract. 2017 Jan-Jun;2(1). doi: 10.1177/2381468317692582. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
5
Psychological and behavioural impact of returning personal results from whole-genome sequencing: the HealthSeq project.全基因组测序返回个人结果的心理和行为影响:健康序列计划
Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Feb;25(3):280-292. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.178. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
6
Media Exposure and Genetic Literacy Skills to Evaluate Angelina Jolie's Decision for Prophylactic Mastectomy.媒体曝光与评估安吉丽娜·朱莉预防性乳房切除术决策的基因知识技能
Public Health Genomics. 2016;19(5):282-9. doi: 10.1159/000447944. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
7
2013 Review and Update of the Genetic Counseling Practice Based Competencies by a Task Force of the Accreditation Council for Genetic Counseling.2013年,遗传咨询认证委员会特别工作组对基于能力的遗传咨询实践进行回顾与更新。
J Genet Couns. 2016 Oct;25(5):868-79. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-9984-3. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
8
Personal Genome Sequencing in Ostensibly Healthy Individuals and the PeopleSeq Consortium.表面健康个体的个人基因组测序与人基因组测序联盟
J Pers Med. 2016 Mar 25;6(2):14. doi: 10.3390/jpm6020014.
9
Participants and Study Decliners' Perspectives About the Risks of Participating in a Clinical Trial of Whole Genome Sequencing.参与者和拒绝参加者对参与全基因组测序临床试验风险的看法。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 Feb;11(1):21-30. doi: 10.1177/1556264615624078. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
10
Impact of Genomic Counseling on Informed Decision-Making among ostensibly Healthy Individuals Seeking Personal Genome Sequencing: the HealthSeq Project.基因组咨询对寻求个人基因组测序的表面健康个体的知情决策的影响:健康测序项目
J Genet Couns. 2016 Oct;25(5):1044-53. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-9935-z. Epub 2016 Feb 22.