Hildebrandt Lea K, McCall Cade, Engen Haakon G, Singer Tania
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Psychophysiology. 2016 Jun;53(6):880-90. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12632. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
Emotion regulation in the ongoing presence of a threat is essential for adaptive behavior. Threatening situations change over time and, as a consequence, require a fine-tuned, dynamic regulation of arousal to match the current state of the environment. Constructs such as cognitive flexibility, heart rate variability, and resilience have been proposed as resources for adaptive emotion regulation, especially in a moment-to-moment fashion. Nevertheless, none of these constructs has been empirically related to the dynamic regulation of arousal as it unfolds over the course of a prolonged threatening episode. Here, we do so by placing participants in a threatening and evolving immersive virtual environment called Room 101, while recording their skin conductance. Subsequently, participants rated their subjective arousal continuously over the course of the experience. Participants who had shown greater cognitive flexibility in a separate task (i.e., fewer task-switching costs when switching to evaluating the valence of positive stimuli) showed better regulation of physiological arousal (skin conductance level), during less-threatening phases of Room 101. Individuals with higher trait resilience and individuals with higher resting heart rate variability showed more regulation in terms of their subjective arousal experience. The results indicate that emotional, cognitive, and physiological flexibility support nuanced adaptive regulation of objective and experienced arousal in the ongoing presence of threats. Furthermore, the results indicate that these forms of flexibility differentially affect automatic and objective versus reflective and subjective processes.
在持续存在威胁的情况下进行情绪调节对于适应性行为至关重要。威胁性情境会随时间变化,因此需要对唤醒进行精细的动态调节,以匹配当前的环境状态。诸如认知灵活性、心率变异性和复原力等概念已被提出作为适应性情绪调节的资源,尤其是在即时的情况下。然而,在长时间的威胁事件过程中,这些概念中没有一个在实证上与唤醒的动态调节相关。在这里,我们通过将参与者置于一个名为“101房间”的具有威胁性且不断演变的沉浸式虚拟环境中,并记录他们的皮肤电导率来进行研究。随后,参与者在体验过程中持续对他们的主观唤醒程度进行评分。在一项单独任务中表现出更高认知灵活性的参与者(即切换到评估积极刺激的效价时任务切换成本更低),在“101房间”威胁性较小的阶段,对生理唤醒(皮肤电导率水平)的调节更好。具有更高特质复原力的个体和静息心率变异性更高的个体在主观唤醒体验方面表现出更多的调节。结果表明,情绪、认知和生理灵活性有助于在持续存在威胁的情况下对客观和体验到的唤醒进行细致入微的适应性调节。此外,结果表明这些灵活性形式对自动和客观过程与反思和主观过程的影响有所不同。