Department of Basic Psychology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
Department of Psychology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2023 Sep;48(3):275-297. doi: 10.1007/s10484-023-09582-6. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB) has been widely used to improve cardiovascular health and well-being. HRVB is based on breathing at an individual's resonance frequency, which stimulates respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) and the baroreflex. There is, however, no methodological consensus on how to apply HRVB, while details about the protocol used are often not well reported. Thus, the objectives of this systematic review are to describe the different HRVB protocols and detect methodological concerns. PsycINFO, CINALH, Medline and Web of Science were searched between 2000 and April 2021. Data extraction and quality assessment were based on PRISMA guidelines. A total of 143 studies were finally included from any scientific field and any type of sample. Three protocols for HRVB were found: (i) "Optimal RF" (n = 37), each participant breathes at their previously detected RF; (ii) "Individual RF" (n = 48), each participant follows a biofeedback device that shows the optimal breathing rate based on cardiovascular data in real time, and (iii) "Preset-pace RF" (n = 51), all participants breathe at the same rate rate, usually 6 breaths/minute. In addition, we found several methodological differences for applying HRVB in terms of number of weeks, duration of breathing or combination of laboratory and home sessions. Remarkably, almost 2/3 of the studies did not report enough information to replicate the HRVB protocol in terms of breathing duration, inhalation/exhalation ratio, breathing control or body position. Methodological guidelines and a checklist are proposed to enhance the methodological quality of future HRVB studies and increase the information reported.
心率变异性生物反馈(HRVB)已广泛用于改善心血管健康和幸福感。HRVB 基于个体的共振频率进行呼吸,从而刺激呼吸窦性心律失常(RSA)和压力反射。然而,目前尚无关于如何应用 HRVB 的方法学共识,而关于所使用方案的详细信息通常未得到很好的报告。因此,本系统综述的目的是描述不同的 HRVB 方案,并发现其中存在的方法学问题。我们在 2000 年至 2021 年 4 月期间在 PsycINFO、CINALH、Medline 和 Web of Science 上进行了检索。数据提取和质量评估均基于 PRISMA 指南进行。最终从任何科学领域和任何类型的样本中纳入了 143 项研究。共发现了三种 HRVB 方案:(i)“最佳 RF”(n=37),每个参与者都按照先前检测到的 RF 进行呼吸;(ii)“个体 RF”(n=48),每个参与者都根据实时心血管数据遵循生物反馈设备,以显示最佳呼吸率;(iii)“预设 RF”(n=51),所有参与者都以相同的速率呼吸,通常为 6 次/分钟。此外,我们还发现了在应用 HRVB 方面的一些方法学差异,例如应用 HRVB 的周数、呼吸时长、实验室和家庭练习的组合等。值得注意的是,几乎 2/3 的研究未报告足够的信息来复制 HRVB 方案中关于呼吸时长、吸入/呼出比、呼吸控制或身体姿势等方面的信息。本研究提出了方法学指南和检查表,以提高未来 HRVB 研究的方法学质量,并增加报告的信息量。