Suppr超能文献

抗抑郁药治疗未改善的重性抑郁障碍患者早期药物转换的随机对照研究——EMC 试验。

Randomized controlled study of early medication change for non-improvers to antidepressant therapy in major depression--The EMC trial.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Mainz, Germany.

Interdisciplinary Centre for Clinical Trials (IZKS), University Medical Center Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016 Apr;26(4):705-16. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Feb 9.

Abstract

Patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and no improvement after two weeks of antidepressant pharmacotherapy have a high risk of treatment failure. The aim of the study was to determine whether an early medication change (EMC) strategy is superior to a guideline-based treatment in MDD patients without improvement after two weeks of antidepressant pharmacotherapy. Eight-hundred-and-eighty-nine patients with MDD were enrolled, 879 patients received the SSRI escitalopram. Of those, 192 patients had no improvement, defined as a reduction of < 20% on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) after 14 days of treatment, and were randomly assigned to open treatment with the EMC strategy (n = 97; venlafaxine XR for study days 15-56; in case of sustained non-improvement on day 28, lithium augmentation for days 29-56) or TAU (n = 95; escitalopram continuation; non-responders on day 28 were switched to venlafaxine XR for four weeks, i.e. days 29-56). The primary outcome was remission (HAMD-17 ≤ 7) after 8 weeks of treatment as assessed by blinded raters. Remission rates were 24% for EMC and 16% for TAU, which was not significantly different (p = 0.2056). Sensitivity analyses for the primary and secondary effectiveness endpoints consistently showed favorable results for patients randomized to EMC. The results confirm data from post-hoc analyses of clinical trials showing that early non-improvement identifies patients who likely need alternate interventions. However, the herein used two-step switch/augmentation strategy for this risk group was not more effective than the control intervention. Alternate strategies and other design aspects are discussed in order to support researchers addressing the same research question.

摘要

患有重度抑郁症(MDD)且在抗抑郁药治疗两周后没有改善的患者有治疗失败的高风险。本研究旨在确定在两周的抗抑郁药治疗后没有改善的 MDD 患者中,早期药物更换(EMC)策略是否优于基于指南的治疗。

共纳入 889 例 MDD 患者,879 例患者接受了 SSRI 艾司西酞普兰治疗。其中 192 例患者无改善,定义为治疗 14 天后汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAMD-17)评分降低<20%,并随机分为开放治疗组(EMC 策略,n=97;文拉法辛 XR 治疗第 15-56 天;如果第 28 天持续无改善,则锂盐增效治疗第 29-56 天)或 TAU 组(n=95;艾司西酞普兰继续治疗;第 28 天无应答者转为文拉法辛 XR 治疗四周,即第 29-56 天)。主要结局为治疗 8 周时盲法评估的缓解(HAMD-17≤7)。EMC 组的缓解率为 24%,TAU 组为 16%,差异无统计学意义(p=0.2056)。对主要和次要有效性终点的敏感性分析一致显示,随机分配至 EMC 组的患者结果有利。

这些结果证实了临床试验事后分析的数据,表明早期无改善可识别出可能需要替代干预的患者。然而,对于该风险组,本研究中使用的两步转换/增效策略并不比对照干预更有效。为了支持研究人员解决相同的研究问题,讨论了替代策略和其他设计方面。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验