Suppr超能文献

基于药物血浆浓度治疗药物监测的艾司西酞普兰个体化治疗的有效性和安全性:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Effectiveness and safety of escitalopram treatment personalized based on therapeutic drug monitoring of drug plasma concentration: a prospective cohort study.

作者信息

Vuković Petar G, Jeremić Aleksandra, Vezmar Milica, Milosavljević Filip, Pavlović Zorana, Pešić Danilo, Drakulić Đorđević Jelena, Pejušković Bojana, Marković Bojan, Ingelman-Sundberg Magnus, Miljević Čedo D, Marić Nađa P, Jukić Marin M

机构信息

Department of Physiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 450, Belgrade, 11221, Serbia.

Institute of Mental Health, Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 12;15(1):32470. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-18517-6.

Abstract

This is the first prospective study aiming to quantify the effectiveness and safety of escitalopram monotherapy initiation where therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was used to achieve the therapeutic reference range (TRR) of plasma concentration. PsyCise-E (NCT05210140) was a hospital-based study conducted in Belgrade, Serbia, involving 92 outpatients with a baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score higher than 13. The primary endpoint was the relative reduction in HAM-D score from baseline to week eight, with dose personalization based on TDM four weeks after treatment initiation. Patients were categorized into groups: (1) unadjusted (they achieved TRR at 10 mg/day), (2) adjusted (their dose was adjusted to achieve TRR) and (3) inadequate (they did not reach TRR). Safety was assessed by the occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and QTc interval prolongation. Most patients required a dose escalation beyond 10 mg/day (71/92), and most patients achieved TRR after eight weeks (79/92). The 55% (95% CI: 47-64) reduction in HAM-D scores did not correlate with escitalopram plasma concentrations and did not differ between groups; however, response and remission rates were significantly higher in patients who achieved TRR by week four. The incidence of ADRs (47/92) increased by 3.2% (0.1-6.3) per ng/ml escitalopram, with no significant differences between the groups. QTc prolongation of 5.5 ms (1.8-9.3) did not correlate with plasma concentration and did not differ between groups. While TDM-guided dosing likely only marginally improved escitalopram effectiveness, it increased treatment safety as TDM-guided dose escalation did not lead to ADRs or QTc prolongation.

摘要

这是第一项前瞻性研究,旨在量化艾司西酞普兰单药起始治疗的有效性和安全性,该研究采用治疗药物监测(TDM)来达到血浆浓度的治疗参考范围(TRR)。PsyCise-E(NCT05210140)是一项在塞尔维亚贝尔格莱德进行的基于医院的研究,纳入了92例基线汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)评分高于13的门诊患者。主要终点是从基线到第8周HAM-D评分的相对降低,在治疗开始4周后根据TDM进行剂量个体化。患者被分为几组:(1)未调整组(他们在10mg/天达到TRR),(2)调整组(其剂量被调整以达到TRR)和(3)未达组(他们未达到TRR)。通过药物不良反应(ADR)的发生情况和QTc间期延长来评估安全性。大多数患者需要将剂量增加至超过10mg/天(71/92),并且大多数患者在8周后达到TRR(79/92)。HAM-D评分降低55%(95%CI:47-64)与艾司西酞普兰血浆浓度无关,且组间无差异;然而,在第4周达到TRR的患者中,缓解率和治愈率显著更高。ADR的发生率(47/92)每增加1ng/ml艾司西酞普兰增加3.2%(0.1-6.3),组间无显著差异。QTc延长5.5ms(1.8-9.3)与血浆浓度无关,组间无差异。虽然TDM指导下的给药可能仅略微提高了艾司西酞普兰的有效性,但它提高了治疗安全性,因为TDM指导下的剂量增加并未导致ADR或QTc延长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a30/12432241/3acdbb199747/41598_2025_18517_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验