Suppr超能文献

基于小鼠乳腺肿瘤模型,探讨对比剂给药剂量与动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)中的时间-强度曲线(TIC)及半定量参数的关系。

Relating Doses of Contrast Agent Administered to TIC and Semi-Quantitative Parameters on DCE-MRI: Based on a Murine Breast Tumor Model.

作者信息

Wu Menglin, Lu Li, Zhang Qi, Guo Qi, Zhao Feixiang, Li Tongwei, Zhang Xuening

机构信息

Radiology department, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Hexi District, Tianjin, China.

Department of General surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Heping District, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Feb 22;11(2):e0149279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149279. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the changes in the time-signal intensity curve(TIC) type and semi-quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced(DCE)imaging in relation to variations in the contrast agent(CA) dosage in the Walker 256 murine breast tumor model, and to determine the appropriate parameters for the evaluation ofneoadjuvantchemotherapy(NAC)response.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Walker 256 breast tumor models were established in 21 rats, which were randomly divided into three groups of7rats each. Routine scanning and DCE-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the rats were performed using a 7T MR scanner. The three groups of rats were administered different dosages of the CA0.2mmol/kg, 0.3mmol/kg, and 0.5mmol/kg, respectively; and the corresponding TICs the semi-quantitative parameters were calculated and compared among the three groups.

RESULTS

The TICs were not influenced by the CA dosage and presented a washout pattern in all of the tumors evaluated and weren't influenced by the CA dose. The values of the initial enhancement percentage(Efirst), initial enhancement velocity(Vfirst), maximum signal(Smax), maximum enhancement percentage(Emax), washout percentage(Ewash), and signal enhancement ratio(SER) showed statistically significant differences among the three groups (F = 16.952, p = 0.001; F = 69.483, p<0.001; F = 54.838, p<0.001; F = 12.510, p = 0.003; F = 5.248, p = 0.031; F = 9.733, p = 0.006, respectively). However, the values of the time to peak(Tpeak), maximum enhancement velocity(Vmax), and washout velocity(Vwash)did not differ significantly among the three dosage groups (F = 0.065, p = 0.937; F = 1.505, p = 0.273; χ2 = 1.423, p = 0.319, respectively); the washout slope(Slopewash), too, was uninfluenced by the dosage(F = 1.654, p = 0.244).

CONCLUSION

The CA dosage didn't affect the TIC type, Tpeak, Vmax, Vwash or Slopewash. These dose-independent parameters as well as the TIC type might be more useful for monitoring the NAC response because they allow the comparisons of the DCE data obtained using different CA dosages.

摘要

目的

探讨Walker 256小鼠乳腺肿瘤模型中动态对比增强(DCE)成像的时间-信号强度曲线(TIC)类型和半定量参数随造影剂(CA)剂量变化的情况,并确定评估新辅助化疗(NAC)疗效的合适参数。

材料与方法

21只大鼠建立Walker 256乳腺肿瘤模型,随机分为3组,每组7只。使用7T MR扫描仪对大鼠进行常规扫描和DCE磁共振成像(MRI)。3组大鼠分别给予不同剂量的CA,即0.2mmol/kg、0.3mmol/kg和0.5mmol/kg;计算并比较3组相应的TIC和半定量参数。

结果

TIC不受CA剂量影响,在所评估的所有肿瘤中均呈现廓清模式,且不受CA剂量影响。初始增强百分比(Efirst)、初始增强速度(Vfirst)、最大信号(Smax)、最大增强百分比(Emax)、廓清百分比(Ewash)和信号增强率(SER)在3组间差异有统计学意义(F = 16.952,p = 0.001;F = 69.483,p<0.001;F = 54.838,p<0.001;F = 12.510,p = 0.003;F = 5.248,p = 0.031;F = 9.733,p = 0.006)。然而,达峰时间(Tpeak)、最大增强速度(Vmax)和廓清速度(Vwash)在3个剂量组间差异无统计学意义(F = 0.06(此处原文有误,应是0.065),p = 0.937;F = 1.505,p = 0.273;χ2 = 1.423,p = 0.319);廓清斜率(Slopewash)也不受剂量影响(F = 1.654,p = 0.244)。

结论

CA剂量不影响TIC类型、Tpeak、Vmax、Vwash或Slopewash。这些与剂量无关的参数以及TIC类型可能对监测NAC疗效更有用,因为它们允许对使用不同CA剂量获得的DCE数据进行比较。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd20/4767184/515fa9af73ae/pone.0149279.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验