Hsu Chia-Hsiang, Chou Yiing-Jenq, Pu Christy
Department of Public Health, National Yang-Ming University.
J Epidemiol. 2016 Aug 5;26(8):413-9. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20150045. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
Although many studies have reported that high-quality continuity of care (COC) is associated with improved patient outcomes for patients with diabetes, few studies have investigated whether this positive effect of COC depends on the level of diabetes severity.
A total of 3781 newly diagnosed diabetic patients selected from the 2005 National Health Insurance database were evaluated for the period 2005-2011. Generalized estimating equations combined with negative binomial estimation were used to determine the influence of COC on the overall emergency room (ER) use and diabetes mellitus (DM)-specific ER use. Analyses were stratified according to diabetes severity (measured using the Diabetes Complications Severity Index [DCSI]), comorbidities (measured using the Charlson comorbidity score), and age.
COC effects varied according to diabetes severity. Stratified analysis showed that the positive effect of COC on DM-specific ER use was the highest for a DCSI of 0 (least severe), with an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.49 (95% CI, 0.41-0.59) in the high-COC group (reference group: low-COC group). Compared with the low-COC group, high-quality COC had a significant beneficial effect on overall ER use in younger patients (IRR 0.51; 95% CI, 0.39-0.66 for the youngest [18-40 years] group, and IRR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.59-0.76 for the oldest [>65 years] group) and those with a high number of comorbidities.
The positive effects of high-quality COC on the treatment outcomes of patient with diabetes, based on the overall and DM-specific ER use, depends on the level of disease severity. Therefore, providing health education to enhance high-quality COC when the disease severity is low may be critical for ensuring optimal positive effects during diabetes disease progression.
尽管许多研究报告称,高质量的连续性护理(COC)与糖尿病患者改善的治疗结果相关,但很少有研究调查这种COC的积极效果是否取决于糖尿病严重程度。
从2005年国民健康保险数据库中选取的3781名新诊断糖尿病患者在2005 - 2011年期间接受评估。使用广义估计方程结合负二项式估计来确定COC对总体急诊室(ER)使用和糖尿病(DM)特定急诊室使用的影响。分析根据糖尿病严重程度(使用糖尿病并发症严重程度指数[DCSI]测量)、合并症(使用查尔森合并症评分测量)和年龄进行分层。
COC的效果因糖尿病严重程度而异。分层分析表明,COC对DM特定急诊室使用的积极效果在DCSI为0(最不严重)时最高,高COC组(参考组:低COC组)的发病率比(IRR)为0.49(95%CI,0.41 - 0.59)。与低COC组相比,高质量COC对年轻患者(最年轻[18 - 40岁]组的IRR为0.51;95%CI,0.39 - 0.66,最年长[>65岁]组的IRR为0.67;95%CI,0.59 - 0.76)和合并症数量多的患者的总体急诊室使用有显著有益影响。
基于总体和DM特定急诊室使用情况,高质量COC对糖尿病患者治疗结果的积极效果取决于疾病严重程度。因此,在疾病严重程度较低时提供健康教育以加强高质量COC对于确保糖尿病疾病进展期间的最佳积极效果可能至关重要。