• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

连续性护理对糖尿病患者急诊室使用的影响因疾病严重程度而异。

The Effect of Continuity of Care on Emergency Room Use for Diabetic Patients Varies by Disease Severity.

作者信息

Hsu Chia-Hsiang, Chou Yiing-Jenq, Pu Christy

机构信息

Department of Public Health, National Yang-Ming University.

出版信息

J Epidemiol. 2016 Aug 5;26(8):413-9. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20150045. Epub 2016 Feb 20.

DOI:10.2188/jea.JE20150045
PMID:26902167
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4967662/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although many studies have reported that high-quality continuity of care (COC) is associated with improved patient outcomes for patients with diabetes, few studies have investigated whether this positive effect of COC depends on the level of diabetes severity.

METHODS

A total of 3781 newly diagnosed diabetic patients selected from the 2005 National Health Insurance database were evaluated for the period 2005-2011. Generalized estimating equations combined with negative binomial estimation were used to determine the influence of COC on the overall emergency room (ER) use and diabetes mellitus (DM)-specific ER use. Analyses were stratified according to diabetes severity (measured using the Diabetes Complications Severity Index [DCSI]), comorbidities (measured using the Charlson comorbidity score), and age.

RESULTS

COC effects varied according to diabetes severity. Stratified analysis showed that the positive effect of COC on DM-specific ER use was the highest for a DCSI of 0 (least severe), with an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.49 (95% CI, 0.41-0.59) in the high-COC group (reference group: low-COC group). Compared with the low-COC group, high-quality COC had a significant beneficial effect on overall ER use in younger patients (IRR 0.51; 95% CI, 0.39-0.66 for the youngest [18-40 years] group, and IRR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.59-0.76 for the oldest [>65 years] group) and those with a high number of comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

The positive effects of high-quality COC on the treatment outcomes of patient with diabetes, based on the overall and DM-specific ER use, depends on the level of disease severity. Therefore, providing health education to enhance high-quality COC when the disease severity is low may be critical for ensuring optimal positive effects during diabetes disease progression.

摘要

背景

尽管许多研究报告称,高质量的连续性护理(COC)与糖尿病患者改善的治疗结果相关,但很少有研究调查这种COC的积极效果是否取决于糖尿病严重程度。

方法

从2005年国民健康保险数据库中选取的3781名新诊断糖尿病患者在2005 - 2011年期间接受评估。使用广义估计方程结合负二项式估计来确定COC对总体急诊室(ER)使用和糖尿病(DM)特定急诊室使用的影响。分析根据糖尿病严重程度(使用糖尿病并发症严重程度指数[DCSI]测量)、合并症(使用查尔森合并症评分测量)和年龄进行分层。

结果

COC的效果因糖尿病严重程度而异。分层分析表明,COC对DM特定急诊室使用的积极效果在DCSI为0(最不严重)时最高,高COC组(参考组:低COC组)的发病率比(IRR)为0.49(95%CI,0.41 - 0.59)。与低COC组相比,高质量COC对年轻患者(最年轻[18 - 40岁]组的IRR为0.51;95%CI,0.39 - 0.66,最年长[>65岁]组的IRR为0.67;95%CI,0.59 - 0.76)和合并症数量多的患者的总体急诊室使用有显著有益影响。

结论

基于总体和DM特定急诊室使用情况,高质量COC对糖尿病患者治疗结果的积极效果取决于疾病严重程度。因此,在疾病严重程度较低时提供健康教育以加强高质量COC对于确保糖尿病疾病进展期间的最佳积极效果可能至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88dc/4967662/ca3968e18cf3/je-26-413-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88dc/4967662/cbc6541fb0b3/je-26-413-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88dc/4967662/ca3968e18cf3/je-26-413-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88dc/4967662/cbc6541fb0b3/je-26-413-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88dc/4967662/ca3968e18cf3/je-26-413-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effect of Continuity of Care on Emergency Room Use for Diabetic Patients Varies by Disease Severity.连续性护理对糖尿病患者急诊室使用的影响因疾病严重程度而异。
J Epidemiol. 2016 Aug 5;26(8):413-9. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20150045. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
2
Continuity of care trajectories and emergency room use among patients with diabetes.糖尿病患者的连续性照护轨迹与急诊室使用情况
Int J Public Health. 2015 May;60(4):505-13. doi: 10.1007/s00038-015-0671-1. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
3
Impact of potentially inappropriate medication and continuity of care in a sample of Taiwan elderly patients with diabetes mellitus who have also experienced heart failure.潜在不适当用药及照护连续性对台湾地区同时患有糖尿病和心力衰竭的老年患者样本的影响。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016 Oct;16(10):1117-1126. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12606. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
4
The impact of continuity of care on emergency room use in a health care system without referral management: an instrumental variable approach.连续性护理对无转诊管理的医疗体系中急诊室使用的影响:一种工具变量方法。
Ann Epidemiol. 2016 Mar;26(3):183-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.12.007. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
5
Effects of continuity of care on the postradiotherapy survival of working-age patients with oral cavity cancer: A nationwide population-based cohort study in Taiwan.连续性护理对口腔癌放疗后工作年龄患者生存的影响:台湾一项基于全国人群的队列研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 16;14(12):e0225635. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225635. eCollection 2019.
6
Effect of Continuity of Care on Emergency Department Visits in Elderly Patients with Asthma in Taiwan.连续性照护对台湾老年哮喘患者急诊就诊的影响。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 May-Jun;30(3):384-395. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.03.160285.
7
Effect of Continuity of Care on Drug-Drug Interactions.连续性护理对药物相互作用的影响。
Med Care. 2017 Aug;55(8):744-751. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000758.
8
Does pay-for-performance benefit patients with multiple chronic conditions? Evidence from a universal coverage health care system.绩效薪酬对患有多种慢性病的患者有益吗?来自全民医保体系的证据。
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Feb;31(1):83-90. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv024. Epub 2015 May 5.
9
Impact of Continuous Care on Health Outcomes and Cost for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Analysis Using National Health Insurance Cohort Database.连续护理对 2 型糖尿病患者健康结局和成本的影响:基于国家健康保险队列数据库的分析。
Diabetes Metab J. 2019 Dec;43(6):776-784. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2018.0189. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
10
Continuity of care, medication adherence, and health care outcomes among patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal analysis.新诊断 2 型糖尿病患者的连续性护理、药物依从性和医疗保健结局:纵向分析。
Med Care. 2013 Mar;51(3):231-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827da5b9.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Medicaid Expansion on Acute Diabetes Complication by Care Delivery Settings.医疗补助扩大对不同医疗服务提供环境下急性糖尿病并发症的影响。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251320161. doi: 10.1177/21501319251320161.
2
Understanding Gaps in the Hypertension and Diabetes Care Cascade: Systematic Scoping Review.了解高血压和糖尿病护理级联中的差距:系统范围综述。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Feb 16;10:e51802. doi: 10.2196/51802.
3
Unmet health care needs: factors predicting satisfaction with health care services among community-dwelling Canadians living with neurological conditions.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk of hospitalization and healthcare cost associated with Diabetes Complication Severity Index in Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database.台湾全民健康保险研究数据库中糖尿病并发症严重程度指数与住院风险及医疗费用的相关性
J Diabetes Complications. 2014 Sep-Oct;28(5):612-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2014.05.011. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
2
Continuity and the costs of care for chronic disease.慢性病护理的连续性与成本
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 May;174(5):742-8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.245.
3
Continuity of care and the risk of preventable hospitalization in older adults.
未满足的医疗需求:预测居住在加拿大的患有神经疾病的社区居民对医疗服务满意度的因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct 17;22(1):1256. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08611-0.
4
Effects of continuity of care on health outcomes among patients with diabetes mellitus and/or hypertension: a systematic review.连续性护理对糖尿病和/或高血压患者健康结局的影响:系统评价。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jul 3;22(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01493-x.
5
Continuity of Care and the Quality of Life among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study in Taiwan.2型糖尿病患者的连续性照护与生活质量:一项台湾地区的横断面研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Nov 14;8(4):486. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040486.
6
Association between continuity of care and long-term mortality in Taiwanese first-ever stroke survivors: An 8-year cohort study.台湾地区首发脑卒中幸存者连续性护理与长期死亡率的关联:一项 8 年队列研究。
PLoS One. 2019 May 22;14(5):e0216495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216495. eCollection 2019.
7
Association between continuity of care and emergency department visits and hospitalization in senior adults with asthma-COPD overlap.老年哮喘-COPD 重叠患者连续性护理与急诊就诊和住院的关系。
Health Policy. 2019 Feb;123(2):222-228. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
8
Continuity of Care Evaluation: The View of Patients and Professionals about Urban Family Physician Program.连续性医疗评估:患者与专业人员对城市家庭医生项目的看法
Int J Prev Med. 2017 Feb 20;8:7. doi: 10.4103/2008-7802.200525. eCollection 2017.
连续性护理与老年人可预防住院风险。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Nov 11;173(20):1879-85. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.10059.
4
Continuity of care, medication adherence, and health care outcomes among patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal analysis.新诊断 2 型糖尿病患者的连续性护理、药物依从性和医疗保健结局:纵向分析。
Med Care. 2013 Mar;51(3):231-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827da5b9.
5
Health-related quality of life, disease severity, and anticipated trajectory of diabetes.健康相关生活质量、疾病严重程度和糖尿病预期病程。
Diabetes Educ. 2013 Jan-Feb;39(1):83-91. doi: 10.1177/0145721712467697. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
6
Patient medical group continuity and healthcare utilization.患者医疗小组的连续性与医疗保健利用。
Am J Manag Care. 2012 Aug;18(8):450-7.
7
Patient satisfaction and clinical parameters in psychiatric inpatients--the prevailing role of symptom severity and pharmacologic disturbances.精神科住院患者的满意度和临床参数——症状严重程度和药物干扰的主导作用。
Compr Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;54(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.03.016. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
8
Early diabetes mellitus or hypertension is not significantly associated with severity of vision loss in nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy.早期糖尿病或高血压与非动脉炎性前部缺血性视神经病变的视力丧失严重程度无显著相关性。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Aug;129(8):1106-7. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.209.
9
Patient perceptions of treatment and illness when prescribed multiple medicines for co-morbid type 2 diabetes.患者对同时患有 2 型糖尿病时服用多种药物治疗和疾病的看法。
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2011;4:127-35. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S17444. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
10
Better continuity of care reduces costs for diabetic patients.更好的医疗护理连续性可降低糖尿病患者的成本。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Jun;17(6):420-7.