Shah Taimur T, Arbel Uri, Foss Sonja, Zachman Andrew, Rodney Simon, Ahmed Hashim U, Arya Manit
Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Whittington Hospital, London, UK.
Galil Medical Ltd., Yokneam, Israel.
Urology. 2016 May;91:234-40. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
To gain a better understanding of ice ball dimensions and temperature isotherms relevant for cell kill when using combinations of cryo-needles we set out to answer 4 questions: (1) what type of cryo-needle? (2) how many needles? (3) best spatial configuration? and (4) correct duty cycle percentage?
We conducted laboratory experiments to monitor ice ball dimensions and create multi-needle planar isotherm maps for 17G and 10G cryo-needles using a novel multi-needle thermocouple fixture within gel at body temperature. We tested configurations of 1-4 cryo-needles at duty cycles of 20%-100% with 1-2.5 cm spacing.
Analysis of various combinations shows that a central core of ≤-40°C develops at a distance of ~1 cm around the cryo-needles. Temperature increases linearly from this point to the ice ball leading edge (0°C), which is a further ≈1 cm away. Thus, the -40°C isotherm is approximately 1 cm inside the leading edge of the ice ball. The optimum distance between cryo-needles was 1.5-2 cm, at duty cycle settings of 70%-100%. At distances further apart or with lower duty cycle settings, ice balls either had a central core >-40°C or had an hourglass shape.
In answer to questions 1-3, tumor length, diameter, and shape will ultimately determine the number of needles and their configuration. However, we propose a conservative distance for cryo-needle placement between 1 and 1.5 cm should be adopted for clinical practice. In answer to question 4, using low duty cycle settings runs the risk of incomplete -40°C isotherm coverage of the tumor, and thus in routine practice we suggest that settings of 70%-100% are most appropriate.
为了更好地理解使用冷冻针组合时与细胞杀伤相关的冰球尺寸和温度等温线,我们着手回答4个问题:(1)使用哪种类型的冷冻针?(2)多少根针?(3)最佳空间配置是什么?以及(4)正确的占空比百分比是多少?
我们进行了实验室实验,以监测冰球尺寸,并使用一种新型的多针热电偶夹具在体温下的凝胶中为17G和10G冷冻针创建多针平面等温线图。我们测试了1 - 4根冷冻针在20% - 100%占空比、间距为1 - 2.5厘米的配置。
对各种组合的分析表明,在冷冻针周围约1厘米的距离处会形成一个中心温度≤ - 40°C的核心区域。从这一点到冰球前沿(0°C)温度呈线性上升,冰球前沿距离该核心区域约1厘米。因此,- 40°C等温线大约在冰球前沿内部1厘米处。冷冻针之间的最佳距离为1.5 - 2厘米,占空比设置为70% - 100%。距离更远或占空比设置较低时,冰球要么中心核心温度> - 40°C,要么呈沙漏形状。
对于问题1 - 3的回答是,肿瘤的长度、直径和形状最终将决定针的数量及其配置。然而,我们建议临床实践中冷冻针放置的保守距离应为1至1.5厘米。对于问题4的回答是,使用低占空比设置存在肿瘤- 40°C等温线覆盖不完全的风险,因此在常规实践中我们建议70% - 100%的设置最为合适。